|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Strategy
what do you guys think of this?
robot is offensive, a kicking mechanism....with treads to allow it to go over the bumps? any other things i should add to the idea??? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
Quote:
I dont understand what you are asking. Are you asking us to design your bot/bouncing ideas of of us/ or something else? also your title really has nothing to do with your thread and this post probably be in the "General Forum" |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Strategy
We were thinking that treads might not be so effective, and to instead utilize tank drive. We had used tank drive last year and its something that's easy to build and service.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
My team doesn't like the idea of treads because we think that it will slow the bot down to much for them to actually be effective.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
If you were planing to go over the bumps I would recomend threads as it will allow you to have traction along the whole of your base. However, when you turn with threads you drag over 90% of the threads. So if you plan to move fast the threads may not be a good option.
In saying that I could be completely wrong ![]() Thanks, timytamy |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
i think this year alot of team will go with mecanum
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
Treads have no relation to the speed of the robot.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Strategy
If your robot is offensive, ther is no need to go over the bumps.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
Yeah there is in my opinion to be able to do end game if you have it and to score the ball if you dont have a long range shooter
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
personally i think you should exile the tread/track idea all together just for the sake of manuverability, with treads you wil have little to no turning capabilities on the carpet or whatever substance we will be driving on.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Strategy
We had the same idea, we value being agile much more than being "tank-like"
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
yeah while you lose pushing power with manuverability you can easily get away from a defensive bot thats not manuverable
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Strategy
Quote:
my team is basing our new drive train on our 2006 robot, The Commander, which went over bumps like it was flat! |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Strategy
Don't be so sure about that. I've seen some well designed treaded robots that can turn very well. You do have to design it right...and that generally means lots of rollers to support the tread, and having the height of each roller just right. Well done, tread type robots are very intimidating.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Strategy???? | dagger | Technical Discussion | 0 | 24-01-2006 10:39 |
| Strategy??? | Waldo1641 | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 21-02-2005 18:11 |
| Strategy? | wmurphy | Rules/Strategy | 7 | 05-02-2005 08:53 |
| White Paper Discuss: Simple strategy/couter-strategy sheet | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 2 | 06-04-2004 22:37 |
| Strategy | Todd Derbyshire | Rules/Strategy | 20 | 09-03-2002 09:13 |