|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas Shock Legality?
I think that Daniel has the true answer here. Although gas shocks can be used on the robot, they are not specifically called out as allowed stored energy at the beginning of the match. This is a job for the GDC.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas Shock Legality?
for "deformation of robot parts" can the gas in the shock not be deemed a part?
that is being deformed from one state to the other storing energy. Works the same as any mechanical spring i know of |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas Shock Legality?
FWIW, Our Rack n Roll robot used two gas struts, in compression, and two pneumatic cylinders at the start of the match. They weren't released until just before the final buzzer went off. It was called the buzzer lift. We were able to lift 500 pounds
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas Shock Legality?
I know that I am going to open a can of worms here, but I like worms.
Most of the discussion here so far has concerned stored energy. From a stored energy perspective, a gas strut is no different than a spring. They differ only in the manner of energy storage. So if a spring is legal, then, from, a stored energy perspective, a gas strut is legal. There could be arguments about where the initial energy to deform the spring/strut comes from in either case. The real question about legality is brought up by this Q& response. While I will stop short of saying they don't exist, I have yet to see or hear of a gas strut that is not, at least partially, filled with oil. The familiar gas strut, is simply an oil filled damper (or shock absorber), pre-charged with nitrogen at about 1500 PSI. While not a formal authority, a description from McMaster Carr might help: Quote:
Last edited by martin417 : 13-02-2010 at 09:13. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas Shock Legality?
Quote:
The GDC has posted multiple threads that verify that gas shocks can be used. Just be aware that lifting a "considerable section" of your robot implies a considerable stored energy and will attract considerable attention from the inspectors in regards to safety. In particular, please insure that you have solid engineering data that the shocks are being used within their specifications and that you have an absolutely fail safe method of insuring the safety of all in the pits, at inspection and going onto and off of the field. Regards, Mike |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CRIO Shock rating | n_ambrogi013 | FRC Control System | 3 | 22-01-2010 10:51 |
| Gas springs legality | itsme | Technical Discussion | 7 | 09-02-2008 21:21 |
| On board shock datalogger? | ChuckDickerson | General Forum | 21 | 07-01-2008 08:10 |
| Shock absorbers? | ZoNeGuY | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 16-02-2005 11:19 |
| -Shock Loading How important is it? | Patrick Wang | Technical Discussion | 18 | 11-08-2002 13:55 |