|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
[[We've had a few times where downloading the code ended up not doing anything.]]We have a decent bot, so I think we'll do well in worlds. I really want to see other designs and learn new things, though. After all, it isn't a FIRST championship if you're not going all googly-eyed over someone else's bot/code. ![]() Last edited by buddyb : 03-03-2010 at 18:19. |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
I hate that light thing!!!! SO MUCH!!! If anything goes wrong it's like an oops oh well sort of thing.
IDK bout the code part, no one was using NXT-G last year at nationals except me when I was on 1102. Though i have to say my transition into RobotC and LabVIEW was quite easy. Our robot at the beginning was a child, but thing is starting to grow it's wings esp. since we beat out two of our own teams 1102, and 3923 who won SC State Day 1. We got beaten by the on day 2 playing defense against 315 and burned out our right motor in the semifinals but still went on to the finals, We re geared the system to have the speed and power of ten bears. and it ended up working for us without the slightest pit stop in TN. The best part of nationals is going to be there is a team from Maryland also called G-FORCE, and we have been talking and if we're on an alliance or against each other it's due to be a funny match. Also weirdly our robots turned our slightly similar shooter wise. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
You use RobotC and LabVIEW? Cool. I'm mainly RobotC, because the LabVIEW programs last year took a while to compile, and- surprisingly- quite a bit of the NXT's puny SSD. I think I was able to get 6 on there before it ran out of space. >.< Very nice. Seeing a huge amount of progress in your robot is always a good thing. ![]() Having multiple teams with similar names in the same match as allies or opponents is always funny. We have 4 FTC teams, and all of them used to just be called "ILITE". So, if we were partnered up to two- or even three- in the same match, it would be "And on the red alliance, ILITE robotics, with ILITE robotics!" XDI just finished all of the FRC coding I can do for the night (see: bugtesting all that I can with a bare cRIO), so I thinks I'm going to move on to programming our FTC autonomouses. In tallying up how many I have to make, I'm seeing numbers in the mid-teens. So, might as well get to work. ![]() |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
yeah, that's hilarious >.<
I have 6 auto's for FRC and now surprising even to me 19 auto's for FTC....I thought I couldn't do it XD lol I need someone to shall I say robot Spar with xD. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
19 FTC Autonomouses?
And I need to make around 16 more. I think our drivers are too spoiled. (And, considering we have around 5 or 6 matches in worlds, more than half of these autonomouses will never see the light of day )Hold a mini-scrimmage, or ask one of your sister teams. If none of your sister teams want to, then make and program an FLL bot and have a rule that you can't get within 18" of it, unless it approaches you. Have someone drive it around. If you're talking about autonomous spar, make the FLL bot a big stick that it holds in the air, and make it beep "SPARTA!" as it gets beat to shreds when it attempts to hold back your robot. XD |
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
I should put a foot on it and have it spartan kick any robot that comes near it, 4 Sonar sensors. XD
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
The programming section of the team basically have worked for quite a while on the automodes considering the robot hasnt changed really since the first competition. |
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
having about 5-7 people on my team doesn't allow much of a team for programming.
And realizing now why would you want so many?? That would open a HUGE margin of error, I would take 5-6 of the best ones and make the them godly perfect. Ours are getting close to that, but I still have kinks to work out. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
If there was an award for "most autonomouses", your team would probably get it at worlds. I'm done with about 30% of FTC 1885's autonomous goals, so I should be done by the end of this week, with any luck at all. ^_^ |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
Currently im in a redesign of our bot just for fun the drive train will be great and will have an anti-jamming/shooter assembly. However fabrication of this design may or may not happen depending on the say of my mentor. lol |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Autonomous?
Quote:
Come to think of it, with the addition of sprockets in FTC this year I think it's actually easy to do a non-coaxial swerve with all modules turned together. Last edited by JesseK : 10-03-2010 at 11:18. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: Autonomous Code Ender | rzoeller | FIRST Tech Challenge | 4 | 03-12-2009 07:32 |
| [FTC]: 3033 Autonomous! | Mushrooshi | FIRST Tech Challenge | 6 | 21-04-2009 22:19 |
| [FTC]: 121 Autonomous | gregsanCHEVY121 | FIRST Tech Challenge | 20 | 10-04-2009 23:10 |
| [FTC]: Autonomous | saaby | FIRST Tech Challenge | 8 | 19-02-2009 12:45 |
| Video: FTC 3 Cloverfield Autonomous | Synergy1848 | Robot Showcase | 0 | 26-02-2008 14:34 |