|
|
|
 I survived the Great CD Spamming of 2006. - Michelle Celio [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| I survived the Great CD Spamming of 2006. - Michelle Celio [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Weird Qualifying Rules
Am I the only one that thinks that the way the seeding points are added up is a little strange? If you can make more seeding points by scoring for the other team then by scoring on your old goal then I think that that screws up the game.
Example During one of our teams matches today we scored 4 goals,just our team (something I have seen very few other teams do today). The final score in the match was 4 to 6 and there were no peneltys. After this match we went down 10 slots in the seed. If we had lost 0 to 6 we would have gone up in the seed. Am I missing something? Does the way the seeding is set up make sence to anyone else? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Late Qualifying | K. Skontrianos | Championship Event | 13 | 13-12-2002 14:59 |
| Looking back at the Nats qualifying rules... | patrickrd | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 09-04-2002 16:12 |
| Qualifying Pairings | Steve Shade | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 10-03-2002 10:04 |
| Qualifying Points | M.I. | General Forum | 1 | 02-02-2002 12:49 |
| Finals Qualifying | Prothe | General Forum | 6 | 11-01-2002 21:24 |
Threaded Mode