2010 Regional Stats

[Creator Mat]

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod

Anyone think of other interesting statistics to track on an event basis?

Could you put average total score in the stats? that would be something interesting to track as the game evolves and more strategies are created.

[Mark McLeod]

Originally Posted by Creator Mat

Could you put average total score in the stats? that would be something interesting to track as the game evolves and more strategies are created.

That's a good idea.
Why don't you add that?

[Mark McLeod]

Here's another way to look at it all.
This focuses on the number of matches overall which is a risky gamble for an event. Guessing how many matches you'll be able to do before you've started and found what problems teams and the field will have is a real challenge.

------------------------------- # teams ---- # matches ---- Matches/team
Overall Averages --------------- 39 ----------- 79 ----------- 10
Greater Kansas City Regional-- 60 ---------- 99 ---------- 10
Los Angeles Regional ---------- 58 ---------- 97 ---------- 10
Microsoft Seattle Regional ----- 64 ---------- 96 ----------- 9
Arizona Regional -------------- 56 ---------- 94 ---------- 10
Autodesk Oregon Regional ---- 61 ---------- 92 ----------- 9
New Jersey Regional ---------- 61 ---------- 92 ----------- 9
Chesapeake Regional ---------- 50 ---------- 92 ---------- 11
Oklahoma Regional ------------ 55 ---------- 92 ---------- 10
Buckeye Regional ------------- 60 ---------- 90 ----------- 9
Washington DC Regional ------ 59 ---------- 89 ----------- 9
Florida Regional --------------- 53 ---------- 89 ---------- 10
SBPLI Long Island Regional --- 48 ---------- 88 ---------- 11
Wisconsin Regional ------------ 50 ---------- 84 ---------- 10
New York City Regional ------ 64 ---------- 84 ----------- 8
Silicon Valley Regional -------- 50 ---------- 84 ---------- 10
San Diego Regional ----------- 49 ---------- 82 ---------- 10
Peachtree Regional ------------ 50 ---------- 82 ---------- 10
Virginia Regional -------------- 63 ---------- 82 ----------- 8
West Michigan District -------- 41 ---------- 82 ---------- 12
BAE Granite State Regional --- 48 ---------- 80 ---------- 10
Ann Arbor District ------------ 40 ---------- 80 ---------- 12
Boston Regional -------------- 53 ---------- 80 ----------- 9
Troy District ------------------ 40 ---------- 80 ---------- 12
Dallas Regional -------------- 53 ----------- 78 ----------- 9
Traverse City District --------- 38 ---------- 76 ---------- 12
Detroit District --------------- 38 ---------- 76 ---------- 12
Finger Lakes Regional ------- 44 ---------- 74 ---------- 10
Kettering District ------------ 40 ---------- 74 ---------- 11
Cass Tech District ----------- 40 ---------- 72 ---------- 11
Boilermaker Regional -------- 39 ---------- 72 ---------- 11
Midwest Regional ----------- 42 ---------- 70 ---------- 10
St. Louis Regional ----------- 35 ---------- 70 ---------- 12
Philadelphia Regional -------- 44 ---------- 66 ----------- 9
Palmetto Regional ----------- 34 ---------- 63 ---------- 11
Pittsburgh Regional ---------- 31 ---------- 62 ---------- 12
Bayou Regional ------------- 38 ---------- 60 ----------- 9
WPI Regional --------------- 29 ---------- 58 ---------- 12
Hawaii Regional ------------ 28 ----------- 56 ---------- 12
Utah Regional -------------- 33 ----------- 55 ---------- 10
Waterloo Regional --------- 30 ----------- 55 ---------- 11
Colorado Regional --------- 41 ------------- 45 ------------ 7 (incomplete)
Israel Regional -------------- 55 ------------- 27 ------------ 3 (unusual circumstances)

[cziggy343]

despite the fact the numbers dont indicate it, palmetto was a very well run regional. since there were not a large number of teams, teh intentionally made the time between matches longer, in order to make sure that everything ran smoothly.

and ps: only ONE real field delay at palmetto