|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Karthik: Effective FIRST Strategies 2010
With the Championships in Atlanta rapidly approaching, I'd like to remind teams of the FIRST Robotics Conference which will be taking place. There are going to be some very exciting conferences, especially the panel discussion being led by JVN at 7:15 PM on Wednesday evening. Earlier in the evening at 5:00 PM, I will once again be delivering my seminar on Effective FIRST Strategies. Here is a thread discussing last year's edition of this seminar:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=76778 And the abstract: Quote:
Also, if you're coming down early on Wednesday make sure you check out Raul's pneumatics presentation right before mine, and JVN's presentation on the engineering design process immediately after mine. It should be a great night for any FIRST or engineering junkie. For more information on all the conferences, please visit the following link: http://usfirst.org/roboticsprograms/....aspx?id=11300 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Karthik: Effective FIRST Strategies 2010
Karthik,
Are you going to tell us the story of the 3-legged wildebeest? Please, please. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Karthik: Effective FIRST Strategies 2010
I am really looking forward to your discussion.
Quote:
Seeding rankings 13, 14, 15, 17, and 18 were not selected for the top 24. Seeding rankings 44, 45, 47, 48, and 62 were selected in the top 24 with 45 as the fourth pick and 62 selected by the top seeded alliance and eventual victors. I apologize if my numbers or team numbers are incorrect but it certainly speaks to the seeding rankings. Huge importance for top 8.....much less for the rest of the pack. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Karthik: Effective FIRST Strategies 2010
I'm not surprised the picks went that way. There are completely different criteria and weighting for the second pick than there are the first.
Generally speaking, the second pick is a defensive pick. Therefore, many robots get thrown out of the mix simply becuase of small things like their lack of acceleration, speed, or traction. Those robots may be excellent offensive bots, but no-so-good defensive ones. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Karthik: Effective FIRST Strategies 2010
[quote=ExTexan;948397]
Seeding rankings 44, 45, 47, 48, and 62 were selected in the top 24 with 45 as the fourth pick and 62 selected by the top seeded alliance and eventual victors. Hmmmm. I'm getting off topic, but this is the first I've heard this. I'm not in charge of scouting, but it goes to show how low the importance of seeding rank is when looking for a good 2nd pick partner. Never despair. I would be interested to hear what JVN has to say. The difficulty and importance of scouting is underrated by so many. I think some of our students consider it is a form of punishment. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Karthik: Effective FIRST Strategies 2010
Quote:
"Scouting is not a punishment" is an important point of Karthik's presentation. Making strategy fun for my team is my focus since I attended Karthik talk a few years ago. His talk inspires you to improve your approach to strategy. Examples of improvements my team made: -More technology usage -Getting to know the team you are scouting -More lively Friday night meetings -Fantasy FIRST Draft for the strategy team before the event w/ prizes for winners. Last edited by The Lucas : 06-04-2010 at 13:29. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Effective Drive Base | DiehardCybercard | Technical Discussion | 114 | 21-02-2010 21:44 |
| [uStream] Effective FIRST Strategies by Karthik - Jan. 8, 2010 @ 3:00 EST | Clinton Bolinger | General Forum | 1 | 08-01-2010 15:36 |
| Karthik: Effective FIRST Strategies | Karthik | Championship Event | 30 | 23-04-2009 10:27 |
| Effective Coaching | Jeff Rodriguez | Rules/Strategy | 13 | 19-03-2006 16:13 |
| Effective Fundraising Letters | archiver | 2000 | 1 | 23-06-2002 23:58 |