|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Future of FRC Teams....
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Future of FRC Teams....
Ahh the legend that he is. Without highjacking this thread too much more, I have to say he is impressive, but my team still came out on top
(no offense intended). Think early last season, on the road, Gold and Black. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Future of FRC Teams....
As stated a few times before. Teams have their ups and downs. Sometimes really long ups and sometimes really long downs. Heck my HS team had one if not their best year ever this season. Even if you have a bad year or 5 bad years as long as everyone has fun and learns something to improve on, it is a successful year to me. Winning feels great, but it's not everything.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Future of FRC Teams....
Quote:
I kid I kid, I was sorta rooting for the Saints ![]() Last edited by Akash Rastogi : 08-05-2010 at 00:30. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Future of FRC Teams....
I kind of see 67 as the Lakers of FIRST, but I'm a HUGE basketball fan.
![]() I believe you could be right but I see it as those teams will always be seen as "dominate" but as FIRST grows and more and more teams get better, the list of "dominate" teams will grow. Whenever you see 67, regardless of if they are having a bad year or not, you'll always see them as great team that you shouldn't take lightly. Just my 2 cents on the subject. ![]() |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Future of FRC Teams....
I'll admit that I didn't read past the OP, so I apologize if I am restating anything.
I feel that one of the largest influences on dominate teams is the returning students. If a student that really helped the team one year returns after they graduate, I can see them doing well again. As knowledge gets past down and grows from year to you, you begin to realize that this is nothing like your typical sport. In football a player can not say "Hey, let me lend you my endurance," but in FIRST student can say "Hey, let me share my knowledge." It is that reason that dominate teams will most likely stay dominate. Another reason is their connection. I feel pretty certain that strong teams make good connections. Not only with sponsors, but with other teams. Just look at 148 and 217. There are times when a team/business/person is only as good as their connections. My $0.02, take it or leave it. (Feel free to throw it off a building after lighting it on fire. But if you do; I want a video. ) -Rion |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Future of FRC Teams....
Quote:
-Maybe I said it wrong before. Teams will not get worse in Robotics (different then sports) , they keep moving forward, But if a team comes together inspired and motivated what is stopping them from heading to the top? And if many teams take this route, we wont have the Same Super All Star teams we are used to seeing all the time playing on the world stage. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Future of FRC Teams....
Quote:
FRC Teams do move in cycles. Every team has their off years, HOT in '06 comes to mind. Will we be talking about new dominant teams? YES! Back when I started Beatty was king. Powerhouses: 33, 47, 65, 111, 71, 45, 494 (This isn't a comprehensive list just the ones off the top of my head). 1114 was good but not powerhouse yet, 2056 wasn't around. 1625 didn't exist yet. 67, while good hadn't had their year made of win and forever cemented themselves as a powerhouse. (Yes, I honestly believe 67 is the most dominant team in FIRST) How many of those powerhouses would you still classify as a powerhouse? They are good but many aren't the top dogs anymore. Teams to talk about in the future: 2056 - Finally made Einstein this year after some rough showings in Atlanta. 2753 - This year may have been an off year but I have a hunch. 2775 - Any team that can come out and be 2 wins away from Einstein is ok in my book. 1323 - Expect them to come out after a Chairman's award soon, they are doing a lot of work in their area. 71 - The BEAST hungers, it has been 7 years since their last Championship win. 2007 was their last Einstein appearance. Watch out Midwest. 51 - Any team that takes a Hall of Fame team and merges it with a former World Champion scares me. Once 51 gets in their groove there will be no stopping them. 2619 - Everyone always talks about 2337 but 2619 is another 2008 rookie who has been even more consistent. 2337 - Has done some unique strategies but given a few years to really get into calling games and strategies they could be a contender. They have some dedicated mentors and sponsors and seem to be good at finding student's passion. 33 - IMHO, had a couple off years but came back with a vengeance this year. Having listened to Jim predict strategies and nail them I have no doubt in my mind this team is going to be aiming to bring home some new gold match their yellow soon. And one wildcard that I have to throw out there, 397. They have been making great strides these last couple years and have recently gotten a new infusion of blood from 27, 67, and 548. If they can get past their issues relating to student recruitment (You would think with 5 trained recruiters as mentors we could get high school students no?) expect to see them come out of the gate strong. If they can't get their issues worked out expect them to flop. (Sorry if my predictions seem rather MI-centric but you call what you know) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| All the FRC Teams That Ever Were | Mark McLeod | General Forum | 98 | 28-07-2010 09:50 |
| NI Announces All Current and Future FRC Training Material | BLAQmx | General Forum | 2 | 10-11-2008 23:17 |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Future of FRC Additional Information | Tottanka | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 13 | 19-04-2008 19:56 |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Future of FRC - Sneak Peek | Beth Sweet | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 52 | 15-04-2008 13:41 |
| Number of teams in future years | archiver | 2000 | 3 | 23-06-2002 23:31 |