|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
toughest regional in 2011?
which regional do you think will be the hardest to win in 2011?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
San Diego deserves a mention.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
I would say the same for Florida. Also for a mention, even as a 1st year regional, Smokey Mountain has an amazing list of teams. Florida has 79, 86, 103, 179, 233, 341 1251, 1902 and SMR has 34, 48, 71, 79, 234, 931, 1024, 2775
Last edited by dodar : 01-31-2011 at 12:11 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
I'll second that...the BBQ rating for San Diego should be impressive!
Last edited by JB987 : 01-31-2011 at 12:05 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Michigan State Championship doesn't count.
Midwest is HUGE. Top tier: 16, 45, 71, 111, 118, 1625, 1732. Second tier: 135, 2041, 2410, 2704, 2826, 2949. Depth few regionals could match and one of the few where the bottom half of the bracket might be an actual advantage. San Diego is strong. 254, 399, 968, 973, 987, 1388, 1538, 1622, 1717 is one hell of a top tier. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Michigan State Championship. No explanation needed.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Toronto. There's a reason I didn't specify which Toronto event. (Well, two reasons, actually, one per event. Both have respected numbers. Both were on Einstein last year.)
Vegas will also be a battle to win, with 359 jumping in late to join 987, 60, 1726, 399, 1266, 4, and 166. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Under that logic wouldn't Waterloo be the harder event to win?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Midwest is consistently one of the most competitive regionals. And with it falling in Week 4 this year several of the major players will already have a regional under their belts.
One thing that is interesting is the number of teams that are doing Wisconsin and Midwest this year. I guess it helps that they are 2 weeks apart this year. Midwest/Wisconsin overlap teams: 111 1091 1625 1675 1732 1781 2022 2041 2826 3197 |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Quote:
In Waterloo, the way to win is to be above them in seeding, or to be better than one of them to the other one, who is hopefully higher in the standings. Not so terribly difficult, now, is it? ![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Hardest Event to win.. MSC... 64 top teams.. yes its all michigan teams.. yes you have to quailify, but still to win it, its tough... Good teams are left out of elims every year...
Hardest Regional to win Midwest.. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
TECHNICALLY MSC is a regional. It just sends way more teams to the CMP than any other.
Anyway, it's the only regional for which it takes more than fingers and toes to count all the really good teams. How was 2834 the final pick in eliminations last year? First and 2nd overall picks at ATL divisions were ranked 8th and 9th at MSC (respectively). Multiple other proofs here. Besides, MSC (and districts, a few of which are loaded as well), I'd have to agree that Midwest is again very strong. San Diego is powerful as well. Those are two regionals I'll have to watch. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Sure it does, don't hate on us.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Quote:
).Last edited by robodude03 : 01-31-2011 at 01:29 AM. |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
The reason the MI State Championship doesn't count is because it's a championship, not a regional. If the MI teams are going to take MSC as a regional, then I'll go ahead and take the Archimedes, Curie, Galileo, Newton, and Einstein--especially Einstein--"regionals" as toughest.
Oh? You have a problem with including events that you have to qualify to get into as regionals? Well, then, MSC is not a regional. The MI districts are tough, though. I think those should be counted as regionals; they're as large as or larger than some of the smaller regionals, and the competition level is as high or higher, especially once you get past the first event for some teams. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|