|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is animation "art" or "science"?
Ponder on that topic
if its art..we can do mysterious and metaphorical representations that need not be explained but we do explain and when we do..we ruin the art slight problem |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is animation "art" or "science"?
So if I drew a picture of a man, and I tell someone "This is a man", it is no longer art?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is animation "art" or "science"?
Quote:
possibly romantic or modernist/impressionist sense of art anymore it ruins the effect if we had mona lisa...and da vinci drew a first logo on it...it would just ruin the art no? or a detailed scene of pastoral nature, and then we put a solar panel or powerplant in the middle...ruins it. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is animation "art" or "science"?
Depends how you use it. Use animation to model something scientifically or to display something graphically. Call it what you want.
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is animation "art" or "science"?
I say art.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|