|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Are you using a C style claw to grab tubes? | |||
| Yes |
|
65 | 47.79% |
| No |
|
71 | 52.21% |
| Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Year of the C claw
From the pictures being posted this is looking like it will be the year of the C style claw for grabbing tubes.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
Yep. But not all roller claws are created equal
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
I totally agree i think 148 has a killer design. Where it opens up to release the tube. I do not know why, but it brings back memories of 47's 2000 bot when it opened its mouth to drop balls. 47's 2000 bot was years a head of most teams.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
We are using the platter type of manipulator, where a part goes under the tube, then the top clamps down on top of it.
We shall have to see which one is more effective, but I get the feeling that it will end up being the roller claws ![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
I don't know, Grim, we're using a design that sounds a lot like yours, with a wide, curved plate that goes under the tube and and claw that clamps down on top. Once we got it working at the Suffield Shakedown, we found that we had no trouble whatsoever picking up tubes from the center of the playing field and that it held them very securely. With practice, our driver is now able to release the tubes quickly and spin away from the rack. We hope to add a four inch "bump" that lowers the claw slightly upon release, making it even easier to place the tubes on the rack.
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
The first thing we did after kickoff was watch Einstein from 2007, our design is loosely based on the Pink Team from that year. The roller c claw is pretty slick... Hopefully we are able to be as successful!
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
I have doubts. The pistons came today, the robot is already shipped. We never tested the pistons with the claw. My worry is that there won't be enough grip.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
We used the same style of roller claw as we did in 2007. Apparently, our claw was pretty good that year. Of course, nobody in 2007 saved documentation...
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
we have a roller claw, but it isnt a C, its a 30 inch long V, the tube gets wedged in tighter the higher the amperage cutoff on our roller. the roller is 6 inches in diameter, but is not directly connected to the axle, instead rubber bands act as spokes, and allow our claw to pick up tubes with a +- 1.5 inch variance from nominal.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
Our is not a c claw, instead it uses a fork to grip from inside, like inverse chopsticks. It will pick up a fully deflated tube from the ground.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
We are using an internal gripper. It is in a C-shape, but it spreads on the inside of the tube. In 2007, our C-Claw caused a lot of slippage.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Year of the C claw
Ours is similar, although I don't know about being able to pick up a completely deflated tube.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|