|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: FRC971 2011
Last edited by roystur44 : 24-02-2011 at 15:15. Reason: edit |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC971 2011
Aw man, why couldn't 254 bust those out a few days ago? Could have gotten some beauty shots of Optimus Lime...
Regardless, looking good guys! Have you managed to get that practice bot together? Is that what we're looking at here? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC971 2011
Quote:
Roy |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: FRC971 2011
I hear timing belt elevators are the future.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC971 2011
Definitely lighter than chain, less complicated than a worm gear, stronger than cord, more accurate and precise over a four bar arm. Designed right the timing belt elevator is simple to construct, very quick and durable and darn right cheap to build.
Roy |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC971 2011
What pitch belt did you use and how did you tension it? We started off with XL belt and ran into issues skipping it at start up. We finally switched to #25 chain and have had no issues since
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: FRC971 2011
Quote:
A 20 tooth XL pulley (1/4" wide belt) is rated to 4.6 in-lbs. A 20 tooth GT2 5mm pitch (15 mm wide belt) is rated to 93 in-lbs. An order of magnitude of difference. The two belts I just compared aren't exactly the same in everything but pitch, so the comparison isn't perfect, but it gives you a pretty good idea on why we chose the belt we did. Our elevator should be able to pick up ~100 lbs before the belts skip. Last edited by AustinSchuh : 24-02-2011 at 16:54. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC971 2011
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: FRC971 2011
SDP-SI has it. It's a bit hard to navigate to, and I think involved a google search. We bought a 40 foot length of it (unfused), and trimmed that to length.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|