|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Field Centric Question
Our team used field centric control this year. However, because the robot starts facing the driver, the gyro's zero position is skewed by 180 degrees.
As the robot is shipped and I don't have a mecanum test environment anymore, I'm trying to convince myself of how this can be resolved. 1) always add 180 to the gyro angle before using it 2) negate both joystick axes (this is the one I'm particularly interested in) Are both of these solutions valid, and equivalent? Thanks for your help. This is probably a really simple question, I'm just having trouble visualizing it. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Field Centric Question
Both will work as long as you mean reverse both axis and not negate
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Field Centric Question
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Field Centric Question
Our team does a 180 after placing the tube during autonomous, so that once teleop starts, the gyro is reset and we're good to go. However, this took a bit of time to tweak, and at this point, you probably don't have that luxury.
|
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Field Centric Question
I would change the one that does only affects field oriented operation, if you ever switch back to normal controls.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Field Centric Question
Quote:
Also, if you ever have the robot start in a different orientation, changing an angle is much more convenient than changing your joystick input, especially if its an awkward angle like 45 degrees. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|