|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
FLR Field Issues
Hey everyone,
I know this is nothing more than speculation, but it's extremely fishy. While our team was at the Finger Lake Regional in New York, several teams had their robots suddenly act erratically during teleop, sometimes in a very suspicious manner. For example, team 843 and Sab-BOT-tage all had their robots act oddly. One of them even had their robot completely out of their control, as in, it kept playing the game correctly during teleop without any hands on the controls. The other two teams had similar encounters. When the robots started to act strangely, things like spontaneous minibot deployment occurred, as if someone was trying to figure out their controls. In addition to that, our robot at one point lost the link to FMS just as the match started, and then magically gained it back immediately when the match ended. During this time, we found out their last reading for our battery was 3 volts, and when we checked, it was actually still charged to 10 volts, so an underpowered bridge is most likely not the issue. All of this happened to the red side only on Friday. What do you all think of this? Out of control robots that can still play the game are hardly the result of field or user error. EDIT: I don't know why I would have suspected hacking. Forget about that and think more about what else could cause these issues. Last edited by BrandonD-1528 : 06-03-2011 at 19:44. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
I don't think you should be too quick to jump to malicious intent. There could be dozens of reasons for what went on and the interpretations of the status indicators and/or movements (or lack-of) of the robots on the playing fields.
I know it's frustrating for teams when something they can't logically explain or figure out happens. It's happened to me before and it sure will happen again in the future but I don't think that malicious intent would have been involved in any of these scenarios. Perhaps if the teams that were having these issues on each of their robots could more thoroughly explain what went on then perhaps we could have a better inside into the problem(s) and if any solutions came of them. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
i dont think all teams really beleive in honorable play. in our 2008 regional, our leftside motor plugs were suspiciously disengaged while the team was at lunch costing us the quarterfinal round. the refs told us it was probably a stray ball, but seeing as how our electrical board and indeed the inside of our robot was protected by blueberry netting i found that a little hard to swallow. BUT, nothing could be proven, it was just dissapointing.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
It's more than a little disappointing people are so quick to blame. I guessed it's human nature.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
Perhaps some one was able to drive it off their iphone?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
Perhaps. But I don't think you should jump straight to someone causing some foul play. It's technology and sometimes it has its own mind.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
I think you guys all have a pretty severe misunderstanding of technology if you think this is possible.
First - aren't robot communications WPA encrypted? Second - why would they target you and not the teams in the run for winning the event? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
are you sure that it was not a glitch that was causing multiple robots to be controlled by one driver station, like, team 1, 2, and 3 all being controlled by team 1's driver station. that would be my guess as to the culprit.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
I was only joking about the Iphone thing, It is always funny when we practice and the drivers suddenly lose control and one of our coaches takes over driving and everyone is so lost lol.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
Quote:
All you need is enough packets -- of which you will get plenty from a robot. 2. It could just be someone entertaining themselves more than trying to ruin a winning team. Last edited by GaryVoshol : 06-03-2011 at 06:43. Reason: Hacking website removed |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
That's really only useful for WEP. The FRC bridge is encrypted with WPA, which is really only cracked through brute force, which, within the period of a single regional, is really not feasible (unless you get really, really lucky).
Last edited by GaryVoshol : 06-03-2011 at 06:44. Reason: Hacking website removed |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
Edit: ditto, rahilm
WPA2 security, as used by FIRST, has no known weaknesses, meaning that there no methods better than brute force for obtaining a key. WEP has critical weaknesses which can be exploited by the software you mention, but FIRST doesn't use WEP, nor should anybody else. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
This is highly unlikely. The field controls have real time status updates on communication between controller and robot. Had alarms been raised by the FTA, the match would have likely been re-run. Not knowing any details on the field side, I can only guess that there was no cause for concern according to the FTA.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
Quote:
Here's an alternate theory: -The 10V robot started the match, and as soon as the drivers engaged the power-hungry main motors, the voltage dropped so low the various voltage regulators couldn't keep the cRio and bridge functional -The 2011 bridge takes about 90 seconds to reboot in our timing -By the time the bridge rebooted and reconnected to FMS, the match was over. |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Possible FLR Hacking?
Yea, 10 volts is a depleted battery, NOT a charged battery.
Don't EVER play with a 10v battery... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|