|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Max number of analog ports
Hi,
Is anyone out there using two 9201 analog breakouts with more than 8 ports total? We've come across a bug. Steps to reproduce the bug: Create a new Simple Robot project Declare the following in the class (typing from memory, so please feel free to correct me): AnalogChannel a1 = new AnalogChannel(1,1); AnalogChannel a2 = new AnalogChannel(1,2); AnalogChannel a3 = new AnalogChannel(1,3); AnalogChannel a4 = new AnalogChannel(1,4); AnalogChannel a5 = new AnalogChannel(1,5); AnalogChannel a6 = new AnalogChannel(1,6); AnalogChannel a7 = new AnalogChannel(1,7); Now compile it, download it, and run it. You will find that it compiles and runs ok. Now add in the following declaration: AnalogChannel b1 = new AnalogChannel(2,1); AnalogChannel b2 = new AnalogChannel(2,2); Compile, download, and run. It will now fail (at runtime) saying Slot 2 Channel 1 is already allocated (or something like that). Now comment out the following lines: // AnalogChannel a5 = new AnalogChannel(1,5); // AnalogChannel a6 = new AnalogChannel(1,6); // AnalogChannel a7 = new AnalogChannel(1,7); Compile, download, and run. It will now work. As far as I can tell (by trying different combinations), there seems to be a limitation on the TOTAL number of Analog Channels you can use!!! If someone can try this code and let me know, I would really appreciate knowing if it is just something with our system, or if this is something everyone is facing. Thanks!! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Max number of analog ports
Yes, this is a bug in Java and C++ (artf1344 and artf1345) Thanks for finding it.
The result is that some channels for slot 2 conflict with channels in slot 1: 2,1 X 1,3 2,2 X 1,4 2,3 X 1,5 2,4 X 1,6 2,5 X 1,7 2,6 X 1,8 If you can deal with 10 or less channels then you can work around these conflicts. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|