|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
I live in Greensboro, and have attended many events at our coliseum. I'd worry about trying to host the Championship there. In addition to only having city buses, the coliseum and special events center is much smaller than the Atlanta and St. Louis Centers. I think there are only about 180,000 square feet in the special events center. Furthermore, I don't think there is a straight path from the convention center to the arena; a loading dock separates the two. Maybe Greensboro could be good for a regional championship. However, a natatorium with three pools is being built. If we see anything here, I guarantee you: Water Game!
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
with less room to move around. That doesn' seem like a better atmosephere to me. On a separate note, I would like to see opening ceremonies shown on all of the field screens. 10k+ people trying to get from the pits to the dome and then back again all at once in a hury seems like a bit of a saftey hazard. And to think that there could have been a similar situation in BOTH directions is kind've scary. ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
The Edward Jones dome capacity is 66,965, which is close enough to 67000. If every seat was full from the Newton field to the Curie filed (50 yard line to 50 yard line), that would be 33,500. There was basically no one sitting around the corners (i.e. on the sidelines of the football field), which means maybe half of the 33,500 was being used. That puts an upper limit on the spectators at 16,750. I also don't think that the upper deck was nearly 100% full, which reduces that number further. I would put a high estimate at 15,000 people watching Einstein from the seats, so a 20,000+ seat arena should be plenty. (BTW, sorry for derailing your thread, Bryan.) |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
What was on the Back-side of Einstein? I would think there might be an excellent spot to put the 12 teams actually in einstein in bleachers on either side. This would likely free up a lot of "saved" room in the middle. |
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
It looked like A/V equipment and a lot of storage. Overall, there was a lot less empty space then at the Georgia Dome.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
http://www.seats3d.com/nba/indiana_pacers/ 3 Blocks away Convention Center or of course Lucas Oil Stadium. http://www.lucasoilstadium.com/Asset...wntown_Map.jpg |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Cobo Hall makes just too much sense! Think about it.
-Greatest concentration of FRC teams in the immediate area. (roughly 80 teams could potentially commute to the event) -2 large arenas that could hold a pair of fields each. -The big three automakers (together probably the largest sponsors of FRC teams) -Some parts of Detroit (particularly around Cobo) are not bad at all, and are actually vibrant urban communities -No fields in the pits. -Wings might not be playing there by the time it is feasible, leaving The Joe empty and desperate for events |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
I say the Orlando Convention Center would work amazingly, but youd have those bleachers like they had in the pits this year for all the seating, unlike an arena seating.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
NHL/NBA playoffs knock out the majority of large capacity Basketball and Hockey venues. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
As for the comments by seveal people that Michigan is the exact opposite of the ideal place to hold WCs. I would like to ask if you are satisfied with a situation where each state has roughly 1 FRC team for every 58,000 citizens. Does FRC only have the chance to grow to up to 5,250 US teams?That sounds like a large number, yet consider the number of secondary schools in the US. There are approximately 37,000 public and private high schhols in America, most of them completely capable of supporting an FRC team. The largest roadblock however is money. Due to the district structure and the concentration of FRC teams within the state of Michigan, Michigan is the closest of any region to becoming the ideal region. If one model region is fostered and grown others will follow. By bringing the FIRST Championships to Michigan I argue that an unprecidented amount of growth would occur across the US and Canada (due to its proximity). My reasoning being that so many teams exist in Michigan, and Michigan teams are amongst the best teams a starting "mentored" FRC teams (see 3538, 3773, and 3539 as examples) that giving them a resource as great as the FIRST Championship would ony accelerate growth in the Michigan market. The next reason FIRST stands the greated benifit by holding champinships in Michigan is the potential for sponsorship revenue. As a group Michigan is a quite well funded region, however with increased growth comes a need for increased revenue. By placing the CMPs directly into the backyard of many large local corporations, Michigan would recieve the sponsorships necessary to gain more teams. Under my belief that the US can support as many teams as there are high schools there is room for 1,200 teams in Michigan so long as sufficient funds are available. The reason other regions would benifit from Michigan's growth is this. Government reacts slowly to things, yet it will eventually respond. If Michigan is able to have a total number of teams approximately equal to 350 within several years of gaining the CMP, it could possibly kickstart widescale recognition of FRC by local districts and state legislatures. Eventually school districts will realize it is more worthwhille giving their robotics team 15K than drowning 90k in the heating costs for a high school swimming pool (Monroe Public Schools spends $92,000 a year on swimming pool upkeep, with virtually no revenue sources or educational value in it). The more teams there are the more visible FIRST is. The more visible FIRST is the more attention it gets. The faster a single region gains visibility the faster other regional gain revenue from the increased visibility of the other region. The faster other regions become visible the quicker these regions gain teams. Sorry for that extremely long thought, and the typos; I had to do this using IE. Last edited by TJ92 : 09-05-2011 at 21:40. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
They have done CMPS at the Stadium/Dome combo before, and our regional competitions used to be at the Arena. I think it is doable. Especially since both venues are HUGE. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
As for SkyDome/MTCC in Toronto, It would be awesome, and doable, however, I seriously doubt they'll ever hold championships outside of the continental US, if only because it simplifies travel plans for the majority of teams. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Any one know if these suites are used to entertain VIPs? There has been no shortage of VIPs at FIRST events, FIRST brings in some big name execs to champs to gather support and sponsorships, these people are used to a certain standard of reception and I would be surprised if that isn't what the suites are used for. I know some one will argue that teams should get seating priority and FIRST should not reduce their experience to raise the experience for a few but I think it is obviously necessary to provided a great experience to VIPs.
Last edited by JamesBrown : 09-05-2011 at 15:49. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|