|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
This is probably to far west for most teams but the Anaheim Convention Center has a stadium attached that does not have a major sports team. It only seat 9,100 people but the only times this stadium is used is for NCAA basket ball early in the tournament. The great thing is that it is across from disneyland.
So maybe it is not ideal for championships but I thinking if California ever did a state championship, this would be a great place (and probably expensive). There has to be a few more convention centers like this one around the country with an unused stadium attached. Perhaps a stadium affiliated more with college sports? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Perhaps FIRST should build its own venue (or 2 or 3).
Jane |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Thats what FIRST could do. Build 3 arenas to the same spec to what it needs to fit CMP perfectly, put one on the East Coast, West Coast, and Midwest. And then have a rotating CMP. Like 2012 would be East > 2013 would be Midwest > 2014 would be West >2015 would be East > etc... And you would try to keep them in line. Like East = Virginia, Midwest = Kansas, and West = California.
Last edited by dodar : 09-05-2011 at 16:54. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Jane Last edited by JaneYoung : 09-05-2011 at 17:26. Reason: the green suggestion |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
The GWCC alone cost $350,000,000 to build. Granted you're not building the entire thing, but you want to build 2-3 halls of a convention center, plus a dome? That's probably $100,000,000 a pop. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Or you could go with seeing if a college would want a CC next to their basketball arena? Have them use it along with FIRST, half the cost with the college and get some big sponsors you could drastically lower the cost. I mean you could check at like Virginia Tech, Univ. of Kansas, and Stanford.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Just today the Minnesota Vikings agreed to build a multi-purpose restractable roof facility. The total cost: 1.057 billion; $884 million for the stadium and another $173 million for the infrastructure. Obviously FIRST's dream location wouldn't cost that much, but I can think of a better use of FIRST's money.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Perfect - let's give some travel love to New England teams and hold the Championships in Manchester, NH
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
That would do what the rest of the year? Who's going to fund it? Who's going to give up land for it? Who's going to build the infrastructure around it that's needed to support it? Arenas and convention centers are MASSIVE undertakings. And local governments don't approve them unless they can see them being beneficial to the local community and cost effective. The degres of this undertaking is truly something well beyond what FIRST has ever done. They would need to find other tenants to share the venue with, design a venue that suits the needs of FIRST programs going forward but is still appealing for other uses, and find a location with the kind of infrastructure to support an FIRST Championship for a long, long time. And then you ask them to do it in two or three different locations? It sure is a nifty idea, but it's one that's completely beyond the scope of possibility for this program at this point in time. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Even as a dream, isn't it fun to think of a place that would be established by the FIRST program but that others would love to use because of its adaptability, technical prowess and innovation, and awesome capabilities? Yes, that is a lot of fun. It may be frustrating for those who want to problem-solve with a points system and removing 3rd alliance partners or the RAS qualification. I understand and respect that type of thinking but when faced with large problems, I always see it as an opportunity to dream big. Really big. There is never any harm in dreaming. Heck, I never dreamed I'd be involved in FIRST for as long as I have, much less watching it expand as it has in recent years. I apologize to our OP for derailing this thread. Please go back to realistic problem-solving and solutions. Jane |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
TOOO Cold!
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
That's something the Boy Scouts do for their National Jamboree every 4 years. Previous to 2013, the BSA had the Jamboree at various places within the nation, most recently Fort A.P. Hill in Virginia. In 2013 they are moving to their newest camp "Summit" in West Virginia.
BSA found that it would be simpler to own their own land for such a large event, enabling them to make the Jamboree even better than it already is. There is no reason why FIRST couldn't benefit from the same thing. It may not be a feasible thing for FIRST to do at this point, but as the program grows, it would make more and more sense to build a FIRST dome for CMP and other robotics events (such as regionals, non FRC events, Vex events, etc...). Another thing to look at is teaming up with a company/city who is building a dome/convention center to make a perfect FIRST location! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|