Go to Post The 3 probably stands for the number of years this season will take off your life - JohnSchneider [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 00:56
Basel A's Avatar
Basel A Basel A is offline
It's pronounced Basl with a soft s
AKA: @BaselThe2nd
FRC #3322 (Eagle Imperium)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 1,922
Basel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond repute
Legality of Downwards-Sloping Ramps

There's been lots of discussion of various ramps, and it appears that most, if not all, ramps were accepted by inspectors from regional events to the Championship.

But that doesn't really satisfy me. At any event, possibly questionable or even outright illegal robots are passed and allowed into competition. There's hasn't been a thorough, rules-based discussion of downwards-sloping ramps (including, but not limited to, those of a U shape or those beginning at higher than 30'').

So that's why I've started this thread. The first real question I have about the legality of a downwards-sloping ramp comes from the following rule:

Quote:
<G19> MINIBOTS must remain completely autonomous and move up the POST solely through electric energy provided after the start of DEPLOYMENT by the permitted, unaltered battery and converted to mechanical energy by the permitted unaltered motors (and associated, appropriate circuitry). <G19> means that HOSTBOTS are not allowed to launch the MINIBOT up the pole at the TARGET, or otherwise contribute to the vertical movement of the MINIBOT. Energy for vertical movement may not be stored in the MINIBOT before DEPLOYMENT (except that which is contained within the battery and excluding incidental kinetic energy stored in the motors or wheels, but NOT, for example, in a flywheel).
Emphasis mine. It is possible that gravitational potential energy, if utilised before or during deployment, is not legal. Some argue that this usage requires the minibot goes down, and that this is actually a disadvantage. I don't think so.

The minibot is required to go up the pole from the deployment line to the sensor to score. During that period, there's no plausible way to gain an advantage by going down. That's why this is (or should be) legal.

However, going downwards before or during deployment can be an advantage. It provides a kinetic energy that, though directed downwards, can be and was converted into kinetic energy propelling the minibot upwards. Because it is an advantageous use of energy not stemming from the minibot battery, a downwards-sloping ramp should not be legal.

Thoughts?
__________________
Team 2337 | 2009-2012 | Student
Team 3322 | 2014-Present | College Student
“Be excellent in everything you do and the results will just happen.”
-Paul Copioli
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi