|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
Great job!
I bet the gussets could be 1/8" thick instead of 1/4" and still hold up. I would add some kind of cross bracing connecting the two gearboxes together. This will make your whole frame more rigid and provide those gearboxes and CIMs with much needed support. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
Ditto Chris for the transmission support. 1/8" plate, bent at the proper angles and bolted to the front of the transmission and joining at the top of the side rails may solve it.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
Looks like a good start!
I would seriously consider riveting a belly pan made of thin sheet (0.030" aluminum or 0.040" polycarbonate maybe) to the entire bottom of the frame and omitting the bottom gussets. This will be a nice place to mount electronics and other components as well as stiffening and strengthening the frame substantially. Ditto on making the gussets thinner also. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
Thanks for the feedback!
Slight updated version, bigger standoffs and nutted/bolted. ![]() The gussets currently are 3/16, so 1/8th would hold up just as well? And replacing the bottom gussets with a poly carb bell pan sounds like a good idea. I am thinking of using this: http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-0836.htm Also I am debating between using eClips or threaded ends on the shafts to hold the wheels in place, would you would guys recommend? Last edited by Mk.32 : 13-12-2011 at 12:02. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
One idea I would have would be to move the center sprockets to inside the transmission plates. This way the outer transmission plate could be touching the chassis which would give much more support to the gearboxes.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
This was something I thought about but the reason why I didn't do it was because the gearboxes are fully based on the toughboxes. If I changed the layout of the gearbox (moving the sprockets inside), it would mean we would need to make custom shafts and I want to keep machining down as much as possible.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
Oh I will definitely look into that, thanks!
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
I notice that you have some rather serious looking fasteners going all the way though the transmission and frame tube. I would suggest making those fasteners smaller. Graded 1/4-20 bolts will be plenty strong enough, even graded 10-24 fasteners would work fine.
I would also suggest having either an insert in the frame tube to transmit clamping loads from the bolt, or have a clearance hole on the outside tube wall and have the bolt only clamp to the inside tube wall. Otherwise it becomes easy to bend or crush the tube with zealous tightening. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
They are 1/2-13, I wasn't sure how well 1/4-20s would hold so I went big... but I guess it wasn't needed.
I will make the outsides holes, clearance holes in the next revision for sure. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
I do not like the look of those gussets. The fact that the frame has no internal bracing and the gussets are so small and have so few holes I think might make it really structurally weak. I would definitely increase the number of holes in each gusset and make them longer so that there is more bracing in each corner. Also, I would recommend another member somewhere in the center.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Team 3647 West Coast Drive
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|