|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Enclosed are our updated designs for a dual-motor, dual-speed robot transmission system, as developed by Team Epsilon Delta (Team 116). After examining a few successful gear-shifting transmission designs during the 2002 FIRST Robotics Competition, we decided to implement this capability for our robo...
Enclosed are our updated designs for a dual-motor, dual-speed robot transmission system, as developed by Team Epsilon Delta (Team 116). After examining a few successful gear-shifting transmission designs during the 2002 FIRST Robotics Competition, we decided to implement this capability for our robot “ED” in 2002. However, our limited fabrication shop prevented us from replicating most of the designs we saw. We set out to develop a design that does not require CNC, wire EDM, or Laser Cutting capabilities. The resulting design was posted last year. This submission includes the "Mark 2" version of the design, which was developed for the 2003 FIRST Competition. This version is smaller, lighter, has fewer moving parts, and is easier to fabricate. It also incorporates the motors found in the 2003 Kit of Parts (i.e. the updated Bosch drill motor). Fabrication requires only hand tools, a manual lathe, and a manual mill (in a real pinch, this design could be constructed with just a lathe equipped with a milling attachment).
If your team uses this design, and if you improve upon it, please post your improvements back to the entire FIRST community so we may all continue to learn and increase our capabilities.
Note: if you have troubles with the download, or if all the images do not translate cleanly (the document was assembled in MS Word X for Mac OS X v2001, and there are reports it does not show clearly on earlier versions of Word), a 10.5Mb .pdf version can be downloaded from our team website.
1062536840transmissiondescriptionv6.doc
25-01-2004 19:57
Elgin Clock
I've never responded to a white paper before but..
Ok, Wetzel gave me this link to this particular white paper and we started investigating this design as a possibility on this years robot for my team.
We ran into a bunch of design inconsistencies while planning the fabrication on this.
Some we solved by trial and error, but I just wanted to let you all know that there are problems with this design.
For one, the shaft location holes are in different places on the Y axis of the part and they don't line up when put together.
But, we solved that problem but still want to verify the correct gear for the bosch output shaft.
Is it supposed to be a 55 or 56 tooth gear?
If wetzel or anyone from Team 116 can answer these questions, please reply here.
Thanks.
BTW, I am not the one who found the inconsistancies, I am just relaying the word and trying to find solutions for my team's mechanical team.
25-01-2004 22:55
tkwetzel
The correct gear for the bosch output shaft is a 55 tooth gear.
I do not see the inconsistency with the shaft location holes that you mention. I do not believe that there is any inconsistency. BTW, this design has worked well for us in the past, so it should not have any major problems, there just might be some improvements to the design.
26-01-2004 00:00
Elgin Clock
Well, like I stated before, I m only relaying info from another team member, so I can only guess what is wrong or right.
Thanks for the confirmation on the gear size though..
If I find out the details for the supposed inconsistencies, I will PM you and try to work them out if that is alright.
Thanks for the help, and I will be getting back to you as soon as I can!
26-01-2004 04:22
dlavery
The "55-tooth question" has already been answered in two other threads (here and here). Please search before you post.
Please make sure that you have the correct URL. The correct link to the white paper is http://www.team116.org/2004/Transmis...riptionV6a.zip. Other development versions are out there, so make sure you are linking correctly.
As noted in the original white paper description, this design is intentionally an "unfinished work." It is intended to provide a basic shifting solution for those teams that want to take on that challenge, but may not have very sophisticated manufacturing capabilities or experienced machinists. If you have greater capabilities, there are a LOT of improvements that can be made to this basic design (ranging from significantly lightening the gears to reducing the face widths to using multiple pitch values for the cascading gears to minimizing the plate widths to ...). We KNOW there is a lot of room for improvement - it is SUPPOSED to be that way. The intent is that teams will improve upon it and post their improvements and thereby increase the overall knowledge/experience of the whole FIRST community, while maintaining the design as one that can be built with minimal manufacturing capabilities. So far, we know that at least 12 other teams have built this design (and there may be several more we cannot confirm). But so far, none of them has "gone public" with any modifications/upgrades they may have made. We are waiting to see who has taken the idea to the "next step."
-dave
26-01-2004 11:07
Stu Bloom
|
Originally Posted by Elgin Clock
... For one, the shaft location holes are in different places on the Y axis of the part and they don't line up when put together.
But, we solved that problem but still want to verify the correct gear for the bosch output shaft. Is it supposed to be a 55 or 56 tooth gear?... |
27-01-2004 03:19
dlavery
See response in this thread.
-dave
05-04-2004 18:14
Joshua May
Where can I find the "0.7 module, 20° pressure angle, 1/2” face width, 55 tooth steel gear." I cannot find it on the PIC Designs site (listed supplier), MSC, or Small Parts.
05-04-2004 19:24
tkwetzel
| Where can I find the "0.7 module, 20° pressure angle, 1/2” face width, 55 tooth steel gear." I cannot find it on the PIC Designs site (listed supplier), MSC, or Small Parts. |