23-04-2006 13:32

Greg Marra

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

It's too bad that FIRST hasn't released the data for the qualification matches at UTC. Other than missing part of the dataset, you've put together a pretty sweet combined scouting sheet here.

Let's see how it holds up at the event!

23-04-2006 14:02

Lil' Lavery

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Contains the same errors that 1114's whitepaper has (mainly the St. Louis elimination rounds, for instance 71 won the regional, while both papers state they didn't make the elimination rounds, but also the Peachtree and Souther Cal finals were inverted in both as well), but overall a terrific job! Another fine tool for pre-championship scouting!

23-04-2006 14:20

Karthik

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Tom & Team 195,

I love what you've done here. You've created a very useful and "smart" metric. It's always good to see teams using the power of statistics to further their analysis. Great work.

23-04-2006 15:08

Bill_Hancoc

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

I olny found one problem-Some of the teams that are on the TEAM DATA page are not listed in the Raw Data page and therefor do not show up when entered on the Inerface page. I dont know if this is due to them not going to ATL but just pionting that out. I dont know how many teams this applies to but i know that team 7 is one of them.

23-04-2006 15:22

Lil' Lavery

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

I beleive that is because they arn't going to Atltanta. 007 is not going this year, for example. Other teams that are on the team data page but not raw data include; 116, 117, 414, and 1731, none fo which will be competing at the Championship event this year.

23-04-2006 16:03

Tom Bottiglieri

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

23-04-2006 17:29

Bill_Hancoc

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Thanks for clearing that up, very nice job

23-04-2006 19:53

Tom Bottiglieri

23-04-2006 19:56

Spindash54

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Hey, this looks amazing. One little thing though.

Our team is only mentioned in the Team Data center, but not the Raw, Curie Rank, or Interface.

I look foward to using this data down at the championship.

23-04-2006 20:00

Tom Bottiglieri

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

24-04-2006 16:14

Tom Bottiglieri

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

I took about 3 hours today manually adding in match data from UTC based on our scouting records.

Revision 2 is available on the download page for this paper. Just click the link in the first post.


Problems solved:

• The UTC data has been added to the overall database, and UTC only teams have been incorporated into their division listings
• Division team listings have been updated to include teams who were "pending"

24-04-2006 16:17

Joel J

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Hi.. Can I get that UTC data!?

24-04-2006 17:17

Ben Piecuch

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Geez, thanks Tom! (please note some sarcasm...) We, team 228, went from one of the mysterious unrated Curie team to a -4.7 average score. Ouch!

Just to let all the Curie scouts know, we did not have a working ball delivery system for UTC. And therefore, were only able to shot about 2 balls a match before the whole thing jammed. We've designed and tested a fix for the problem, and will hopefully have it installed and working by mid-Thursday. Please stop by our pits to say hi, and to take a look at the new system. Best of luck to all the teams!

BEN

24-04-2006 17:31

Tom Bottiglieri

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

24-04-2006 21:20

sw293

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Interesting & good job. I have a couple of small questions:

Why should the average scale score at each regional be zero? It seems that this would penalize teams that attended stronger regionals when comparing scores across regionals.

Also, did you try scaling the scores once over the entire season, i.e. treating the entire FIRST season as one regional and scaling the scores based on that? (I realize there are plenty of reasons for not doing this).

24-04-2006 21:44

AndyB

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

you are my hero. amazing job!

24-04-2006 22:07

Tom Bottiglieri

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Revision 3:

Lil' Lavery fixed the event history section for St. Louis, SoCal, and Peachtree.

24-04-2006 23:19

DanDon

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Hey Tom,

I don't mean to ask for more work from you, you did an awesome job already, but is there any way for you to make a sheet with the teams ranked in divisions based on highest scaled score?

If not, its no biggy,

09-02-2007 00:20

Compnerd

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Are you going to do a 2007 analyzer?

09-02-2007 00:35

Tom Bottiglieri

Re: paper: 2006 frc195 Statistical Team Analyzer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Compnerd Are you going to do a 2007 analyzer?