|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
2006 Championship OPRs. These are real unlike the ones that some irresponsible individuals were passing out at Championship.
Rumor has it that a team was passing out (against my wishes) copies of OPRs at championship. Note that those OPRs were from regional competitions so they don't tell you who is playing well at championship. I am POed at the individuals who were distributing the regional OPRs, but that's another story. Here are the official OPRs for championship.
curie.txt
galileo.txt
archimedes.txt
newton.txt
29-04-2006 11:54
sw293These are the real Championship OPRs. The ones being passed out at Championship were from regionals and this was being done against my wishes.
10-05-2006 16:28
Tim Arnold
Thank you for these. I did not know about the incorrect OPRs at championships, that really is too bad that a team would do that. They might not of realized that robots can change drastically in performance since regionals.
Only thing: Some people don't know what OPRs are in the first place so it might not hurt to either put a header on the files or in your origin whitepaper post.
Thank you for generating these again!
EDIT: For those who haven't seen the original white paper about OPRs, it stands for Offensive Power Rating. It is a mathematical way to express team's progress and, obviously, offensive power. More information about OPRs can be found at this forum thread.
10-05-2006 17:29
Bongle|
Originally Posted by JamesBrown
What do negative points indicate?
|
01-06-2006 22:19
gblakeWow! - It's hard to believe anyone had a lower Curie division OPR than us.
Next year.....
Blake