|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Fairly easy to use excel program. Just click on what's what.
OK, radio buttons are running wild! Hopefully I'll be able to improve on it somehow. but it's a start. Check out the discussion board for info and any bugs.
RACK-N-ROLLv4p0.xls
RACK-N-ROLLv4p5.xls
08-01-2007 01:07
cbudrecki
OK, v1.0 is officially posted. I see it as a BETA version. I'd like to switch to drop-down lists, but that'll take some studying. Please inform me of any bugs that you find so I can fix them ASAP!
If you play around with it enough you just may find an easter egg
08-01-2007 01:07
Pavan Dave
Nice work. I was working on one earlier.
Pavan.
08-01-2007 01:08
cbudrecki
08-01-2007 01:28
DanDon
YAY!! I've gotten the ENGINEERING AWARD!!! Woohoo!
08-01-2007 02:22
Tri_Lamsome possible errors:
i have to double cheack it but spoilers are not countering the score plus
also when 2 ringers of same aliance are on a leg i think scores are supose to be null.
08-01-2007 11:00
cbudrecki
|
some possible errors:
i have to double cheack it but spoilers are not countering the score plus also when 2 ringers of same aliance are on a leg i think scores are supose to be null. |
08-01-2007 11:22
BandChick
Looks good! I expect this to be wildly helpful in explaining my strategy! =)
08-01-2007 11:41
Trample-Botmy elite maglev system has come into place quite well.... engineering award for me
also, nice job. That is some serious skill in excel
+1
08-01-2007 12:02
fernandoscihi there!
that was a great job...
it is working well... but i didn't understand what is written in the white fields...
and i have a doubt about the pontuation... my team didn't found any examples with a row formed in the spider legs #8 and #1... so after a lot of discussions, we still don't know if it will be acepted..
thank you
bye, and good lucky!
Fernando Ito- ETEPTeam#1382, Brazil
08-01-2007 18:18
cbudrecki
|
hi there!
that was a great job... it is working well... but i didn't understand what is written in the white fields... |
|
and i have a doubt about the pontuation... my team didn't found any examples with a row formed in the spider legs #8 and #1... so after a lot of discussions, we still don't know if it will be acepted..
thank you bye, and good lucky! Fernando Ito- ETEPTeam#1382, Brazil |
08-01-2007 18:30
cbudrecki
I must also add that I am quite proud to have the First scoring program to be posted in the papers for the 2nd year in a row...
08-01-2007 20:31
Greg Needel
|
I must also add that I am quite proud to have the First scoring program to be posted in the papers for the 2nd year in a row...
|
09-01-2007 14:55
cbudrecki
I must say, I did release v1.0 without any major testing. I was able to play with it for about an hour last night, and I must send my apologies to the 300+ downloaders of this BETA version. If you haven't picked up on the problems, here they are:
-column 3 does not work (simple programming error)
-in addition to scoring the columns, it also adds the points per tube (ie, a 2-tube column would equal 8 pts(4-row + 2 per tube)) This was purely an overlooked point in the original programming and will be fixed.
Unfortunately, I don't have a computer at home. I made it while I was at work (which is weekends only), and I'm at the library now (which is internet only), and then school doesn't start until next week. However, I will head down to school tomorrow to see if I can use thier computers, if so, v2.0 will be released tomorrow fixing many of the errors that have been found in v1.0, otherwise, it'll have to wait until Saturday.
So please, keep your eyes open for a CRITICAL UPDATE post, hopefully sometime tomorrow.
09-01-2007 16:38
wheelerThis looks great.
I am assuming that the double is to account for spoilers and what is then behind it?
Also in the next release could you add a easy reset button?
Great work
09-01-2007 16:42
Po-ser
Awesome! Thanks! 
P.S. Since according to your spreadsheet, we get an engineering award for raising all three bots up, we decided to build a hover craft!
P.P.S. I wish.
10-01-2007 10:27
cbudrecki
Version 2.0 is now posted.
I highly suggest trashing v1.0 and replace it with the new version. The scoring in version 2.0 is much more reliable than in 1.0. In 1.0, columns would add individual points from the tubes as well as the rows, this is no longer the case in 2.0. Also, column 3 just didn't work at all, this is now fixed. I've played around with it a little, but it seems to be working fine for me.
IF YOU FIND ANY PROBLEMS, PLEASE POST THEM AND I WILL GET THEM RESOLVED ASAP!!!
10-01-2007 10:35
cbudrecki
|
This looks great.
I am assuming that the double is to account for spoilers and what is then behind it? Also in the next release could you add a easy reset button? Great work |
10-01-2007 10:50
cbudrecki
of course, playing around with the more reliable 2.0, I realized it wasn't adding the top row in addition to the columns, a quick programming change and v2.1 is now released.
ENJOY!
10-01-2007 11:48
Zach WydickI was just curious as to where V2.0 is posted
10-01-2007 11:56
cbudrecki
10-01-2007 12:09
Zach WydickThank you very much and the program is very nice and helpful.
10-01-2007 12:40
cbudrecki
v2.2 is released.
I've played with it thouroughly and all seems to be OK. The scoring definately throws you off looking at it quickly, but take a minute, sit back, and really think about what was counted and what is now getting counted, and it all makes sense. (I was driving myself nuts thinking things weren't adding up correctly...)
I do truly feel that v2.2 will give you a very accurate scoring and as always, if you find something wrong, don't hesitate to post it.
Also, once again, I would appreciate anyone who knows VBA code to help with a RESET button. What needs to be done is posted earlier in this thread.
10-01-2007 13:18
Clinton BolingerIn version 2.1, if you put a Red Keeper or Ringer on the Top and Middle Row of the 1st Column the score say 6, when it should be 4.
Might want to take a look at that.
-Oris-
10-01-2007 13:25
cbudrecki
This space is intentionally left blank...
10-01-2007 13:39
cbudrecki
|
[SIZE="7v2.2"] is released.
[/size] I've played with it thouroughly and all seems to be OK. The scoring definately throws you off looking at it quickly, but take a minute, sit back, and really think about what was counted and what is now getting counted, and it all makes sense. (I was driving myself nuts thinking things weren't adding up correctly...)I do truly feel that v2.2 will give you a very accurate scoring and as always, if you find something wrong, don't hesitate to post it. Also, once again, I would appreciate anyone who knows VBA code to help with a RESET button. What needs to be done is posted earlier in this thread. |
|
In version 2.1, if you put a Red Keeper or Ringer on the Top and Middle Row of the 1st Column the score say 6, when it should be 4.
Might want to take a look at that. -Oris- |
10-01-2007 13:50
Spider-Man
I was playing with v1.0 yesterday fixing it to work for me and adding extras.
Reset was something i was looking into, and this is the macro I came up with:
Sub Button1456_Click()
Range("B2:Q2,B9:Q9,B16:Q16").Select
Selection.Value = 6
Range("R3:T3,R11:T11").Select
Selection.Value = 1
Range("A1").Select
End Sub
10-01-2007 14:12
Barry Bonzack
Just an FYI for openoffice spreadsheet users, I am having problems getting this to do anything at all. I'll try it once I get to school with excel.
10-01-2007 15:48
cbudrecki
Version 3.0 is now posted. It's exactly the same as 2.2.1 only it has a RESET thanks to Spidey.
10-01-2007 16:07
wheelerThis is looking good. I am working on one with a student as well that we hope to complete this week.
I did notice that if you complete a column it is scoring 10 instead of 8 but then it corrects as more are added.
Keep up the good work
10-01-2007 16:11
cbudrecki
|
This is looking good. I am working on one with a student as well that we hope to complete this week.
I did notice that if you complete a column it is scoring 10 instead of 8 but then it corrects as more are added. Keep up the good work |
10-01-2007 16:16
Zoheb Nwow these are awesome.. thanks for gettin them up so fast
10-01-2007 16:22
cbudrecki
v3.1 is now up
they're kicking me out of the computer lab for today, so I think I'll be able to check up on things tomorrow night, if not then Friday.
I must say THANX and GREAT JOB to all of you who have pointed out the problems and, of course, once again to Spider-Man who gave me the code for the RESET button.
TTFN!
10-01-2007 16:28
PandaManV 3.1 still adds incorrectly. When you have a row of 8 it = 256, which is correct. But when I remove a tube from position 5, it shows 144, when it should really be a row of 3 and a row of 4 which = 24.
10-01-2007 19:05
cbudrecki
|
V 3.1 still adds incorrectly. When you have a row of 8 it = 256, which is correct. But when I remove a tube from position 5, it shows 144, when it should really be a row of 3 and a row of 4 which = 24.
|
|
Yes, I know there is currently debates as to the whole wrap-around issue. I did design this scoresheet to count the wrap-arounds and if updates state that all rows scored end at 8, then I will be sure to update the scoring ASAP and get a new version reposted.
|
10-01-2007 22:10
PandaManOh alright, thanks for the clarification.
11-01-2007 14:30
cbudrecki
|
to get 144, you probably have other legs selected to add to the 128 for a 7-row - read the whole thread-
|
11-01-2007 15:09
cbudrecki
Rack & Roll Scoring v3.2 is now posted
this resolves the issue of adding rows starting at column 1 to a wrap-around row. Made rows, dropped tubes, added columns, all seems to be working OK.
12-01-2007 12:19
cbudrecki
I am just kinda curious, if you've downloaded the scoresheet, check out this poll.
12-01-2007 12:41
cbudrecki
|
Yes, I know there is currently debates as to the whole wrap-around issue. I did design this scoresheet to count the wrap-arounds and if updates state that all rows scored end at 8, then I will be sure to update the scoring ASAP and get a new version reposted.
|
|
Originally Posted by GDC
The numbers on the top row of Spider Legs are for reference purposes only. Potential rows are determined solely by adjacency and "wrap around" the reference locations. So a set of scored Spider Legs 7, 8 and 1 would be considered a row of three.
|
12-01-2007 13:09
Kuru OujouIt appears on version 3.2 you reversed the Keepers and the Ringers.
I could be wrong, I didn't play with it a whole lot, and I didn't observe it closely.
13-01-2007 17:52
cbudrecki
|
It appears on version 3.2 you reversed the Keepers and the Ringers.
I could be wrong, I didn't play with it a whole lot, and I didn't observe it closely. |
13-01-2007 18:05
mtaman02
The Reset button does nothing =( at least nothing to the current scoring scenarios or the score itself.
13-01-2007 18:08
cbudrecki
v3.3 POSTED
Unfortunately, after playing yet some more, I noticed that columns 2-8 were scoring as 10 points, not 8. That issue is now fixed.
13-01-2007 18:11
cbudrecki
|
The Reset button does nothing =( at least nothing to the current scoring scenarios or the score itself.
|
13-01-2007 18:36
mtaman02
Ah I see. Believe it or not my Macros was on but they were set to maximum. Why I have no idea I just lowered it to medium or low and all works fine now.
13-01-2007 18:38
cbudrecki
v4.0 RELEASED
v3.3 with added QP and RP scoring. May be helpful in strategizing. Enjoy!
13-01-2007 18:39
cbudrecki
|
Ah I see. Believe it or not my Macros was on but they were set to maximum. Why I have no idea I just lowered it to medium or low and all works fine now.
|
13-01-2007 19:23
cbudrecki
if anyone would like, I would gladly post a version with red and blue MAX score buttons(922 by the way). I have it done, but until I can get older versions of the score sheet deleted from the paper, though, I'd really rather not post any more than necessary.
14-01-2007 20:50
cbudrecki
|
if anyone would like, I would gladly post a version with red and blue MAX score buttons(922 by the way). I have it done, but until I can get older versions of the score sheet deleted from the paper, though, I'd really rather not post any more than necessary.
|
14-01-2007 22:14
wheelerHere is one that I was working on to link to an access database for scouting purposes.
Let me know what you thinkhttp://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/1907