15-03-2014 18:51

stingray27

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Just updated the excel sheet with data up to the end of week 3. Here are some stats about the stats:

10 teams with OPR values of over 100
Standard deviation of 21.57 with the mean OPR of 25.72
The following are each quartile of all of the data:
0% = -20.80
25% = 10.35
50% = 21.93
75% = 37.33
100% = 152.06

More info about cumulative OPR stats can be found from Ether or Ed Law. This data is more specific to individual teams and their performance.

15-03-2014 20:35

Ether

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Some Twitter stats:

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh....php?p=1359356

... more to come later this evening.

22-03-2014 18:27

stingray27

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Just updated up to week 4. Fixed query results and added sheets for each week. Interpret data to your discretion.

02-04-2014 15:57

stingray27

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Week 5 updated.

02-04-2014 16:52

Peter Matteson

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

It appears you don't have any data for the Hartford district in your file.

07-04-2014 11:33

stingray27

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Week 6 uploaded with a stat preview for the MI State Championship.
It has been brought to my attention that a few regionals/districts are missing. I will add those very soon.

07-04-2014 16:33

Shu

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Can someone explain how DPR is determined? I was looking at the MSC preview data and saw we had an OPR of 87.4 and DPR of -9.2 at Waterford. We put very little concentration on defense during qualifications to accumulate assist points to help in our ranking.

07-04-2014 16:36

jlmcmchl

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

It's calculated the same way as OPR, but instead of using your total scores, you sum up your opponent's scores and use that instead.

By itself it's normally rather meaningless, but performing OPR-DPR gives you CCWM(Calculated contribution to winning margin), which can be more meaningful, though I don't have any statistics on it from this year.

07-04-2014 18:21

pwnageNick

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

This may just be because I am being tired and stupid, but is there a way to see the rankings of teams based on their season long OPR. Right now if you sort by "OPR Rank" there is a separate line for every regional a team went to. Is there a way to view just the rankings based on all teams total OPR or advance OPR or whatever?

Great work.

-Nick

07-04-2014 18:36

jlmcmchl

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Ether's data has world OPR, but this focuses on event performance.

16-04-2014 15:32

stingray27

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Added data for each division for worlds.

16-04-2014 16:44

mwtidd

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Any chance you're going to add in DCMP into there or are you skipping intentionally because the scores were so much higher at those events?

16-04-2014 16:47

stingray27

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

It is already in there! There is a tab for week 7. Since defense was so much more of a factor at DCMPs, the scores kinda got standardized already

16-04-2014 16:52

mwtidd

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Haha, good call. In all the CMP excitement I missed that the DCMPs OPRs were lower than the District OPRs.

Whoops...

Oh by the way, thanks for providing this!

16-04-2014 16:54

JohnFogarty

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Question because this is the second set of data that only has our results from Mrytle Beach. Why does it not account for our better showing at Orlando in the Curie division data.

16-04-2014 17:02

jlmcmchl

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Your OPR at Orlando was actually lower than at Myrtle Beach.

Orlando: 23.72
Myrtle Beach: 26.76

16-04-2014 17:03

JohnFogarty

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

We played an entirely different game at Orlando. Our DPR is significantly higher in that aspect.

I see that you're sorting by OPR. Which is understandable.

16-04-2014 17:07

stingray27

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

Most people look at OPR because DPR isn't quite the best indicator to a teams performance - it relies on alliance strategy even more than OPR. Therefore, for my purposes, I just chose to sort by OPR. Teams can choose to look at other aspects of team data and I encourage you to do so!

16-04-2014 17:17

stingray27

Re: paper: 2014 Advanced OPR and Statistics

So you guys have brought up some regionals that I have missed and I apologize. I will add the following soon:
Lenape
Hartford
Crossroads
Silicon Valley