|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is a summary of the total team attendance and results in FRC CMP elimination rounds in the 16 year period from 2001-2016
This sheet contains a record of all teams who have played in CMP elims in 16 years. It uses the district point method to rank all of the teams for their selection point in the alliance selection and their finishing level in the tournament. Results are accumulated using a total points and a weighted annual de-rating method.
Championship_History_Data_2016.xlsx
03-05-2016 21:05
Richard Wallace
Thanks for updating this, Jim. It is very interesting to see the close correlation between your derated point ranking of teams, and my own qualitative recollections of performances I have witnessed over the years. As an example, scanning your list I instantly recognize about 2/3 of the top 150 teams without looking up their numbers.
In particular, during the 8 seasons I have been observing FiM teams from inside our system, the correlation is remarkable. I didn't need to look up any of these teams, because I recognize their numbers immediately as belonging to Michigan teams that have performed well.
Below is a list of the top 31 FiM teams based on Zondag Derated Points (ZDP).
FiM Team Zondag Rank ZDP Name 67 9 99 HOT 33 12 95 Killer Bees 217 16 78 Thunderchickens 469 17 72 Las Guerillas 27 27 61 Team RUSH 1718 28 58 Fighting Pi 1023 30 57 Bedford Express 3539 43 51 Byting Bulldogs 1918 46 49 NC Gears 494 50 45 Martians 2137 61 42 TORC 548 66 40 RoboStangs 2834 67 40 Bionic Black Hawks 85 79 36 BOB 2054 86 34 Tech Vikes 3538 89 34 RoboJackets 503 91 34 Frog Force 4003 97 32 Trisonics 5050 100 31 Cow Town 3641 102 31 Flying Toasters 2337 104 30 Enginerds 910 105 30 Foley Freeze 4967 111 28 That ONE Team 3357 119 26 Comets 68 125 25 Truck Town Thunder 3620 135 23 Average Joes 5460 139 22 Strike Zone 70 141 21 More Martians 2767 142 21 Stryke Force 573 147 21 Mech Warriors 51 151 19 Wings of Fire
08-05-2016 18:00
araniaraniratulHey Jim,
Awesome spreadsheet as always. Just noticed a few things. I think a few world champions are listed as finalist for some reason. I'm not sure if you did that for the weight tapering system or it was just oversight, but just a thought I had. For example, I know that in 2001, 365 and 294 both were WC, but are listed and WF.
09-05-2016 12:40
Peter Matteson
|
Hey Jim,
Awesome spreadsheet as always. Just noticed a few things. I think a few world champions are listed as finalist for some reason. I'm not sure if you did that for the weight tapering system or it was just oversight, but just a thought I had. For example, I know that in 2001, 365 and 294 both were WC, but are listed and WF. |
09-05-2016 14:14
Steven SmithThanks for putting this together again!
3005 was listed as a Division Winner for Curie on the main rollup screen (Green W), but we were actually division finalists. It looks like the points calculation, ranking, and subsequent data screens are all correct based on our Division Finalist finish.
Spot checking a few others on the list, it appears 3166 had a similar issue, and possibly some others.