|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
A little hint of what we are developing.
It is always best to plan for the future by learning from the past.
23-01-2003 15:10
Ian W.
if i didn't know better, i'd say an internal combustion engine, but that's not FIRST legal, is it...? 
23-01-2003 23:25
Jnadke
It looks like a pneumatically-driven engine... I see cylinders in there.
Won't go fast enough to go anywhere. Monster torque though. Probabaly burn up the compressor in the process.
Ingenious design though. Good job.
23-01-2003 23:38
Ian W.
one thing we may be ignoring...
|
Description: A little hint of what we are developing. It is always best to plan for the future by learning from the past. |
24-01-2003 00:02
sevisehdaIf its pneumatic its a waste. Why put all that energy into a motor(compressor), then convert it into pressure, then into rotary motion when you could of just used a motor?
My guess is its a vacuum generator.
24-01-2003 01:26
Jnadke
|
Originally posted by sevisehda If its pneumatic its a waste. Why put all that energy into a motor(compressor), then convert it into pressure, then into rotary motion when you could of just used a motor? My guess is its a vacuum generator. |
25-01-2003 03:17
sevisehdaDepending on the length of the cylinders and the size of the cams they could go the full length. It would help to know if the cutouts are visual or actually there.
26-01-2003 22:03
AJ QuickThat would be amazing to actually see a team run off of a pneumatic engine. The power would probably be insane, there wouldn't be much that could stop it. Unless you wait for the compressor to explode ofcourse.