Go to Post Dave Lavery says it's pimp? I don't care if the Pope says it's pimp, it still doesn't pass inspection! - MissInformation [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > CD-Media > Photos
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

photos

papers

everything



TechnoKat Teaser #4

Clark Gilbert

By: Clark Gilbert
New: 02-05-2003 06:45 PM
Updated: 02-05-2003 06:45 PM
Views: 852 times


TechnoKat Teaser #4

Recent Viewers

  • Guest

Discussion

view entire thread

Closed Thread

02-05-2003 08:18 PM

Cory


Unread

wow those are some incredibly sweet omi-wheels

Cory



02-05-2003 09:16 PM

Solace


Unread

hey, you guys already posted a teaser, didn't you? I thought you were using tracks?

or both? that wouldn't make much sense.



02-05-2003 09:19 PM

Beast314


Unread

I could see the omni's as part of a turning system. They use the omni's to raise one end off the ground for tighter turning. Just my thought. I'm not sure why they'd be driven though.



02-05-2003 09:27 PM

Joel J


Unread

Quote:
Originally posted by Beast314
I could see the omni's as part of a turning system. They use the omni's to raise one end off the ground for tighter turning. Just my thought. I'm not sure why they'd be driven though.
From where I am looking, it seems as though the treads will go down when they are on the ramp or in need of power, and the omni wheels elsewhere; the omnis seem ideal for the 15 second automode, hrm..



02-05-2003 09:36 PM

OneAngryDaisy


Unread

Quote:
Originally posted by Joel J.
From where I am looking, it seems as though the treads will go down when they are on the ramp or in need of power, and the omni wheels elsewhere; the omnis seem ideal for the 15 second automode, hrm..
their first teaser showed the treads to be bolted to the aluminium.. so your idea would only work if the omni's came down- and where's the space for that?


personally, i think either the omni's won't be on the robot, or they'll be someplace else other than the main drivetrain..



02-05-2003 09:41 PM

Cory


Unread

They could be switchable with the tracks, depending on what they feel like using from match to match.

Cory



02-05-2003 10:50 PM

Madison


Unread

Quote:
Originally posted by Cory
They could be switchable with the tracks, depending on what they feel like using from match to match.

Cory
Except that, as best as I could see, their treads are directly driven off the gearboxes. There was no chain. So, the sprocket on the omniwheels becomes the anomaly.

I'd not be too surprised if they popped out of the bottom for easier turning. It's a great system, still allows for two speeds, and is capable of doing other neat things, too, unrelated to drivetrain stuff.



02-05-2003 11:10 PM

Jnadke


Unread

Quote:
Originally posted by Andy Baker
Rob, you have a keen eye. But... if you look closely at the gearbox nearest to the camera, there is a spot for the F-P motor. We figure that by adding the F-P motor, it will give us about 18.62553% more power. So, we've got that going for us, which is nice.

Currently, we plan to use our F-P motors to spin the "super-duper-really-cool-shinny thing" at about 1,000 rpm, and everybody knows what that is going to do.

So... our big dilemma is how we are going to use these F-P motors. Do we go for more power or do we spin the "super-duper-really-cool-shinny thing"?

Andy B.
Man, those super-duper-really-cool-shinny things look cool! Of course they're cool, because they're super-duper-really-cool-shinny things.

I'd go with the super-duper-really-cool-shinny things... too much pushing power is overkill in this year's game. It gives you more maneuverability too...

Hmm... the super-duper-really-cool-shinny things look like they have a diameter of 6" from the person holding them (looks like they are approximately 1 handspan, 5-6").

0.5ft * pi * 1000 RPM / 60s = 26 Feet per Second

Nice and fast... but are you gonna have enough torque to accelerate your 'bot??????



Personally, if you plan on stacking boxes, I'd mount the omni's perpendicular to the treads... so that you have a kind of "swerve drive". This gives you 3 options. You can use the treads for maximum traction/pushing power. You can lower the omnis on the front and use the rear treads for a slow-moving powerful robot that turns nice. Or, you can lower both the back and front omni's for optimum turning and speed. Perfect for broad-siding your oponents, but you might want to protect your treads with 1/16" polycarb if you do this.

If you have trouble understanding what I mean by perpendicular... mount the wheels so that they rotate toward the treads. The omnis on the right tread side of the robot would spin freely on the bearings... and the omnis on the left tread side would each be driven by a FP. The front and rear sets of omnis would be mounted on aluminum rods (2 per rod), so that you could engage either the front or back, or both. It would only require 2 cylinders then... The only problem I see, is will the omnis be able to turn the FPs when the treads want to turn... Either that or you can have your programmer drive the FP's for omni-assisted turning.


There are many advantages of this... for example, stacking boxes would be easier. Pick one up, slide/swerve over to the stack, and drop it down. Second, it would be handy on the ramp to dodge speeding robots.... hehe. The main advantage is robot automation. Drive your robot forward on treads until you lose the white tape, then swerve back over until you passed the tape twice, which puts you approx at the center of the ramp. Then tread up the ramp and show those boxes who's boss.



02-06-2003 11:06 AM

Clark Gilbert


Unread

LOL



02-06-2003 05:33 PM

Jnadke


Unread

I must be right that those are the super-duper-really-cool-shinny things Baker was talking about, because he didn't say no



02-06-2003 09:36 PM

Ken Leung


Unread

Too bad you guys haven't seen their old robot, or you would've know what these are for.

Back at 98 or 99, I am not sure which one (probably 99), they had a tread system, and they lower two wheels from the back to the ground so the treads only touch the ground in the front, and turn the system into a 4 wheel drive like system.

Which would make sense for this tread system, because with the high side friction, it make it easier to turn when they lower these omni wheels on the back.



02-12-2003 06:20 PM

Raul


Unread

Nice design. They look very familiar.



02-19-2003 04:39 PM

Eric Bareiss


Unread

I don't see these in your drive train. Are these what are inside those boxes at the ends of your wings?



02-19-2003 09:51 PM

Austin


Unread

That's for us to know, and you to lose sleep over finding out!



view entire thread

Closed Thread
previous
next

Tags

loading ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi