|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This design is outdated for my purposes as I've already moved onto its second revision, so I thought I'd post a screenshot here for everyone to see. It's nothing that hasn't been done before -- but I thought it might spark some conversation or better, ideas.
Of course, this is a two-speed, shift-on-the-fly solution that doesn't require a shifting transmission. I do realize that a shifting transmission is probably an easier way of achieving the same result if you're only looking for two-speed performance, though.
As with anything, this sort of design has its advantages and disadvantages.
No pictured are the chains and sprockets and the mechanism that engages the yellow block in the center -- typically a pneumatic piston. Also missing is the mounting solution for attaching this to a chassis (I turned the outer plating off for visibility's sake.)
This achieves two speeds by utilizing two wheel diameters. The inner, smaller wheels are a low-speed tank drive. The outer omniwheels are, of course, larger in diameter and geared up slightly to produce high speeds. The high-speed wheels are lowered via the four-bar linkages on each end.
This was made in Solidworks. If anyone would like a copy of the assembly and its parts, I'll see what I can do about getting them to you.
Questions, comments, concerns and criticisms are appreciated.
07-11-2003 09:04
patrickrd
Hey M.
Looks interesting! I actually haven't seen that type of drive-switching mechanism before, we (639) implemented a vaguely similar idea for 2002. I'm kind of confused exactly what it's intention is, maybe you can elaborate for my slow mind? For example, why are there two omniwheels? This would result in a robot with 4 omnis touching ground right? I'm also curious why the rollers of the wheels are slightly staggered. So yea, I'm just interested to hear a summary of what it does 
Hope you're enjoying Seattle!
- Patrick
07-11-2003 09:18
Gadget470While I can't really say anything for the staggered rollers, I assume it's so that pressure is held closer to the drive rollers so there is less chance of slack being a factor working against the drive roller. Some kind of a pre-tensioner?
As for the omni wheels, their productivity is two fold (possibly)
When the yellow block connected to the dark blue frame actuates vertically, the Tank-Treads would be lifted and the omni wheels in place.
If each omni wheel is idependantly powered, the bot would be able to have omnidirectional motion and have a smooth 0º turning radius.
If each Omniwheel set is powered by one motor, the bot would not have omnidirectional motion, but would have the smooth 0º turning radius.
According to the description, the tank drive is for slow & high torque applications, while the omniwheels geared for fast lower torque applications. Example: Omni's to get to the objective first, then the tanks for holding it.
07-11-2003 13:45
Madison
|
Originally posted by patrickrd Hey M. Looks interesting! I actually haven't seen that type of drive-switching mechanism before, we (639) implemented a vaguely similar idea for 2002. I'm kind of confused exactly what it's intention is, maybe you can elaborate for my slow mind? For example, why are there two omniwheels? This would result in a robot with 4 omnis touching ground right? I'm also curious why the rollers of the wheels are slightly staggered. So yea, I'm just interested to hear a summary of what it does ![]() Hope you're enjoying Seattle! - Patrick |