|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Qualification match
177 countered this move later by keeping the top shut until just before the balls dropped, and by moving back and forth under the drop until then.
05-04-2004 16:33
David BridgeNot to knock 358 for their brilliant strategy, it took some big balls to pull off (just one really
) but I feel it should be noted for all scouts who may see the picture that 177 continued to herd balls and narrowly win the match
05-04-2004 16:41
Ryan M.
Oooohhhhh...
Big arm. 
How'd they do during the rest of the competition?
05-04-2004 17:01
EvanGHow'd who do? Us or them?
We went on to win the regional, they however continued to play an excellent game into the elimination rounds where I believe they made it to the semi-finals. However, I could be wrong on that.
05-04-2004 17:04
ZACH P.Hey Evan, you obviously had a reliable ball delivery system for your net. Can you give me some detail on the working of it?
05-04-2004 17:11
David Bridge|
Originally Posted by ZACH P.
Hey Evan, you obviously had a reliable ball delivery system for your net. Can you give me some detail on the working of it?
|
05-04-2004 17:14
Ryan M.
|
Originally Posted by ZACH P.
Hey Evan, you obviously had a reliable ball delivery system for your net. Can you give me some detail on the working of it?
|

05-04-2004 17:24
ZACH P.|
Originally Posted by David Bridge
Im not evan, but can answer the question just as well... at the front of the robot we have a knurrled roller thats about 12 inches off the ground, it runs the full width of the robot (about 2.5 balls worth)... The roller is run by a globe motor that has had one set of planetary gears taken out to give us the speed and power that we wanted. The motor is actually anchored inside of the roller so it gives us a direct drive with no loss of power, but at the same time doesnt take up much additional space. In the hopper itself there is a conveyor made of polycord which is run by a geared window motor to keep the balls from jamming... This system results in excellent performance picking up and delivering the balls
|
05-04-2004 17:32
EvanGI don't mean to be the Devil's advocate here, but don't expect to get it right your first time. I will say that 177 has tried several times to do small balls, and it took forever to finally get a system that works. A lot of it is just trying and trying till you get it to work. I'm sure you'll get it eventually.
Also, it's minor, but the polycord conveyer on our bot is actually powered by a van door motor while the basket is currently opened by a geared window motor. This may change and we may be opening the basket with vacuum because its much more forgiving.
05-04-2004 18:42
RoteAugenI love seeing pics like these lol! I definitely want to try to see if we can do that in atlanta... it just looks so funny to me to see one robot capping another!! 
05-04-2004 18:51
ZACH P.|
Originally Posted by EvanG
I don't mean to be the Devil's advocate here, but don't expect to get it right your first time. I will say that 177 has tried several times to do small balls, and it took forever to finally get a system that works. A lot of it is just trying and trying till you get it to work. I'm sure you'll get it eventually.
Also, it's minor, but the polycord conveyer on our bot is actually powered by a van door motor while the basket is currently opened by a geared window motor. This may change and we may be opening the basket with vacuum because its much more forgiving. |
05-04-2004 19:08
EvanGIt's not intrusive. If I had pics, I'd get them for you, but alas, I couldn't find any on my computer. However, feel completely free to stop by our pit at the nationals. I'm sure anyone in our pit would be more than willing to show you all the components of our bot. Depending on who you talk to, you might just get the whole talk, from the unique and innovative vacuum to the rollers. ;D
You'll figure out the important factors in delivering the balls. I'm sure you're doing it, but you should work on developing some ideas for systems now before Atlanta so you can make them there. The thing we had the most problems with, but is probably the most important thing (or it appeared to me but what do i know? I'm only an electronics guy) is the grip on the balls. If you have a good grip, and you have a good speed kicker, you can deliver the balls fairly efficiently. If its too loose, no matter how fast your kicker is, it won't move anything. If its too tight, it will just lift your robot on top of the ball instead of kick it.
Without seeing your bot, I couldn't tell you what I think is the problem and what you can do to fix it, but i'm sure you'll take a look at it and go ah hah! and get it. It happens all the time.
05-04-2004 22:13
ZACH P.Well thank you for your help. You've been most gracious.
08-04-2004 16:00
Ryan Morin
This is great because back in NJ me and my coach, Rob, came up with this exact same strategy but were unable to do cause another robot got in our way. But this is great I thought no one else would ever think of this strategy to stop this kind of robot. 
08-04-2004 16:06
DaBruteForceGuy
Ah i remember that.... won of the best momants at Philly....
08-04-2004 17:24
theory6It's not that funny when it's your team robot that gets capped
but got to hand to to the opposing team...that was a pretty smart idea to cap another robot
Ofcourse there are tons of ways to counteract that 
08-04-2004 20:23
RBrandyI am not absoluly positive on this, someone told me capping a robot was now against the rules. Ill have to look it up. If some one else knows, let me know.
08-04-2004 21:36
Ryan Morin
|
Originally Posted by RBrandy
I am not absoluly positive on this, someone told me capping a robot was now against the rules. Ill have to look it up. If some one else knows, let me know.
|
09-04-2004 13:12
Mark McLeod
We had a lot of debate in the pits and with a few other teams before we did this to 177. We were also worried that it might damage their mechanism and we didn't want to do that. One of the options was to just hold the big ball over 177's hopper and deflect the balls.
We got our comeuppance that match when the power connector to our arm motor came loose. We couldn't cap or hang after that.
09-04-2004 14:30
BoyWithCape195|
Originally Posted by RBrandy
I am not absoluly positive on this, someone told me capping a robot was now against the rules. Ill have to look it up. If some one else knows, let me know.
|
09-04-2004 15:26
RoteAugen|
Originally Posted by BoyWithCape195
Um, it is not against the rules, its still perfectly legal in the competition
|
09-04-2004 15:58
EvanGI haven't heard anything on the legality of this action, but I could see where both sides could have their arguement. I.E. - It should be legal for this purpose; It was an amazing defense move that messed us up for a little bit. It should be illegal because there are some robots out there that may not have the durability that our bot had and could break.
I suppose its up to the refs at each competition. I really hate to side with the side that capped my robot, but I do recall Dave Lavery saying make sure your bot could take a hit with a yellow ball. Don't worry though, our drivers know how to handle it now--preventing the ball from going in, and getting it out if it does.
09-04-2004 20:29
RBrandyI'm sorry, I thought I heard somebody say that at Midwest. I must have been mistaken. Thanks for the clarification.
|
Originally Posted by Mark McLeod
One of the options was to just hold the big ball over 177's hopper and deflect the balls.
|
09-04-2004 23:01
Tyler Olds
|
Originally Posted by RBrandy
I'm sorry, I thought I heard somebody say that at Midwest. I must have been mistaken. Thanks for the clarification.
This happened to us. We almost came back and won the match, but we didn't collect enough balls to over come the other alliances points. It was still a GREAT match. Good job to Team 27 for using that strategy on us. See you in Atlanta!!! ![]() |
12-04-2004 20:57
DarkJedi613
|
Originally Posted by Texan
Oooohhhhh...
Big arm. ![]() How'd they do during the rest of the competition? |
|
Originally Posted by Ryan Morin
This is great because back in NJ me and my coach, Rob, came up with this exact same strategy but were unable to do cause another robot got in our way. But this is great I thought no one else would ever think of this strategy to stop this kind of robot.
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by RBrandy
This happened to us. We almost came back and won the match, but we didn't collect enough balls to over come the other alliances points. It was still a GREAT match. Good job to Team 27 for using that strategy on us.
|