|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is one of the one hundred things I've worked on since the BAE regional. Please give me some feed back. Its what I call a torque converter and is mechanically automatic transmission. BTW the ratios are not set and the motor is on the side of "cone shaped object" 
27-04-2004 15:41
Eric BareissSo there is some sort of belt that runs between the two spools. How are you shifting? Is the green thing a tensioner?
This is a very interesting idea, can you give us an idea of exactly how this is going to work?
27-04-2004 15:47
Pat Roche
Im going to attempt to describe how this works in words...bear with me. I'm not sure how familar you are with a snowmobile transmission works but this is on variation of it. What I've done is have the motor spin the cone shaped object. This cone will spin a timing belt. and depending on the power needed by the robot the belt will slide up and down the cone. The spool shaped object is the output shaft to the wheel/track/etc. This whole system works of the tension of the springs and the belt and is mechanically automatic. The green thing is the tensioner on the belt. Currently this is my last ratio only because I don't believe a belt could handle the high RPM of the atwoods(my team only uses the atwoods in the drivetrain).
Please keep the questions coming...
-Thanks
Pat
*edit*there are some more design views being uploaded soon*edit*
27-04-2004 15:49
NoRemorse
This is called a CVT (continuely variable transmission), a torque converter uses hydrolic forces to chagne torque in automatic transmissions.
there are designs all over these forums of them! Yours looks nice though!
27-04-2004 16:02
Chris Hibner
|
Originally Posted by NoRemorse
This is called a CVT (continuely variable transmission), a torque converter uses hydrolic forces to chagne torque in automatic transmissions.
|
27-04-2004 17:45
Pat Roche
I plan to make a white paper if I can test it and whatnot. I also will have some more detailed drawings eventually. Can anybody see any problems with the current one (other than theres no motor)
-Thanks
Pat
27-04-2004 18:38
sanddragWhat keeps the belt from slipping. Does just the friction keep the spool and cone in sync? Also, what would be the efficiency of a contraption like this?
27-04-2004 18:44
Pat Roche
Thats correct that the friction of the belt and cone cause the spinning action. The spool looking object will be a timing pulley and will have teeth. As for the efficiency not sure havent done any testing.
-Pat
27-04-2004 19:54
abeD
How do you keep tension in the belt when it slides down to the right side where it is smaller?
27-04-2004 20:09
HunterIf this device is actually built like a mini torque converter from a snowmobile (I'm from northern Canada and have three snowmobiles, and the assemblies in them don't look the same.) then it will have very low efficiency, especially with an electric motor. Because the Troque converter in a snowmobile uses high RPMs to shift the belt ou farther and gain a higher ratio. The faster the motor spins the more torque you get. This is fine for a gas engine that is designed where the maximum torque output is very close to the redline RPM, but in an electric engine the max torque is a 0 RPM, so it would be impossible to get even close to your maximum torque out of a that sort of design with an electric engine.
Then again I have lots of snow machines, and spend most of my free time fixing snowmobiles, and that device doesn't look the same as whats under the hood of my Mach Z.
27-04-2004 20:15
NoRemorse
here is a pic of team 494's cvt, using 2 cones to control the ratio. much better than one in my opinion.
27-04-2004 20:23
Max Lobovskynoremorse, how does the ratio changing happen? I can't see how the timing belt can move anywhere or how either of the pulleys change size unless maybe the two halfs of the cones move closer to each other...
27-04-2004 20:23
Pat Roche
|
Originally Posted by abeD
How do you keep tension in the belt when it slides down to the right side where it is smaller?
|
27-04-2004 20:27
NoRemorse
The 2 cones move toward eachother, effectivly increasing the diameter of the conact area of the belt and cone. The other side does the opposite to componsate for tension.
27-04-2004 20:40
Pat Roche
Noremorse,
I see what your saying in why two is better. For simplicity though I thought that one would work. This is still obviously being developed. My next step is to get the details worked in and hopefully build a working model. I think that a problem that I may have to solve is increasing the distance between the two pulleys. Any comment on that?
-Pat
27-04-2004 20:46
NoRemorse
http://cvt.com.sapo.pt/toc_en.htm
Great site on all types of CVTs and thier applications.
27-04-2004 21:05
Pat Roche
http://www.andersoncvt.com/
This is what I was trying to emulate on a smaller scale and with one cone. I couldnt find the supplies (chain) to actually do it the way the anderson is setup but I will try to find a way to do it like it. The site you posted was awsome.
-Thanks
Pat
*edited*
27-04-2004 22:08
NoRemorse
If you use oposing cones, you can use standard v-belt. the only problem is your limited to a certain range of ratios due to the width of the belt, and the travel of the cones.
27-04-2004 22:21
Bduggan04|
Originally Posted by maxlobovsky
noremorse, how does the ratio changing happen? I can't see how the timing belt can move anywhere or how either of the pulleys change size unless maybe the two halfs of the cones move closer to each other...
|
27-04-2004 22:53
George1902
|
Originally Posted by Bduggan04
Although it is hard to see because the tranmission is moving, there are counterweights on the nearest pulley that are meant to push the two halves together. The counterwieghts are similar to those found inside a governor and the force they apply to the pulley varies according to the rpm of the shaft.
|
27-04-2004 22:56
Pat Roche
Sitting here thinking I realized the importance of the second cone and if I put that if I sync the belt and the cones just right, I could actually put 4 ribs on the cones this way it could be a "toothed" belt going between the two cones.
This would be ideal for spinning.
Thanks for all the help. I'll post more drawings as I finish.
-Pat
*wahoo 100 posts*
29-04-2004 19:16
Pat Roche
Okay I have revised my design and will be posting hte pics. Could I get some feedback on this design?
-Thanks
Pat