|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Just another look...
18-01-2005 16:57
Arefin Bari
Looks very nice. Great job.
one question, How are you planning on securing the Fisher price motor? is it just hanging there? or is there something I am missing?
Another thing (probably i cant see it just because of the plates), is there any shaft inside that transmission that are going through 3 bearings? If yes, then its bad.
great job on keepinging the transmission about 5 pounds.
-Arefin.
Edit - I am not an Engineer YET. But from my understanding of making a transmission, I would say, try to make the transmission and put everything (gears, motors, shafts, bearings, bushings) between 2 plates and not 3.
18-01-2005 16:58
Cory
|
Originally Posted by Arefin Bari
Looks very nice. Great job.
one question, How are you planning on securing the Fisher price motor? is it just hanging there? or is there something I am missing? great job on keepinging the transmission about 5 pounds. -Arefin. |
18-01-2005 19:25
Fe_Will|
Originally Posted by Arefin Bari
Looks very nice. Great job.
one question, How are you planning on securing the Fisher price motor? is it just hanging there? or is there something I am missing? Another thing (probably i cant see it just because of the plates), is there any shaft inside that transmission that are going through 3 bearings? If yes, then its bad. great job on keepinging the transmission about 5 pounds. -Arefin. Edit - I am not an Engineer YET. But from my understanding of making a transmission, I would say, try to make the transmission and put everything (gears, motors, shafts, bearings, bushings) between 2 plates and not 3. |
18-01-2005 19:29
Arefin Bari
|
Originally Posted by Fe_Will
-That shaft must be supported on all three points, hence the three bearings...
![]() |
18-01-2005 19:35
sanddragHaving a shaft supported by three bearings is like an over-constraint. The only way you should even consider doing this is if you are certain you can keep tolerances to around .0004 (yes 4 ten-thousandths) and trust me, that is not an easy thing to do, even on a CNC.
Will it work with three bearings on a shaft? Yes. Will it bind and cause a loss of efficiency? Yes.
18-01-2005 19:45
Roland
Is there really much use for a 4-speed transmission this year? Surely there's not going to be so much variance in field conditions that you'll want or need to shift that much on a field as small as this one...
18-01-2005 19:58
Cory
The field is longer than last year and there were two teams that used 4 speed transmissions. It's up to each team's personal preferences whether or not the added complexity and time is worth the advantages
18-01-2005 20:23
Roland
Of course it's up to teams to decide what to build. I'm just wondering how often multi-speed gearboxes are used in competition on the field. I've never driven a robot with a multi-speed gearbox, nor have I spoken at length to drivers on teams with multi-speed gearboxes. I simply want to hear honest opinions about what good a gearbox like 955's here will do this year. I understand how plenty of experienced teams would do it for the cool factor alone, but I want to hear what real drivers - or mechanical designers, even - have to say about multi-speed drivetrains in practice.
18-01-2005 20:27
Cory
Well, I've driven a couple shifting robots and 2 single speed robots.
One of the single speed robots was very slow, one was very fast.
Of them all I'd rather drive the two shifting robots. You have power when you need it, and speed when you need it. With the single speed ones there was always moments when I either wished I had more speed, or more torque, respectively.
18-01-2005 22:34
Fe_Will|
Originally Posted by Roland
Is there really much use for a 4-speed transmission this year? Surely there's not going to be so much variance in field conditions that you'll want or need to shift that much on a field as small as this one...
|
18-01-2005 22:54
NoodleKnightThe easiest solution is just to drop the middle bearing. And 4 plates? Seem's kind of a lot, how thick are these plates? Because judging by the CAD rendering, they seem to be a lot thicker than necessary.
19-01-2005 18:40
cheezerthe plates on the tranny are 3/8 inch thick
19-01-2005 19:05
RogerR
|
Originally Posted by cheezer
the plates on the tranny are 3/8 inch thick
|
22-01-2005 01:35
Fe_WillThey are aluminum. We are known for our "tanks", it'll be built to last.