01-20-2005 10:37 PM

sanddrag

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

Can you provide a link to where you bought the wheels? Also, how is the tread attached?

01-20-2005 10:45 PM

russell

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

You didnt actually make those...... did you?

01-20-2005 10:56 PM

Stu Bloom

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

Looks like it is probably either this:
http://www.gomeyer.com/shop/product_...oducts_id/1278
or this:
http://www.gomeyer.com/shop/product_...oducts_id/1592

with some tread material added ...

01-20-2005 10:59 PM

David Guzman

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

Those are nice. How many of them are you using? what is the coefficient of friction on the surface?

David

01-20-2005 11:00 PM

Swampdude

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

yep it's the second link there (ADA Prowlers). These are beautiful and light. I saw them in a motorcycle shop 6 months ago, and the light went off. These are perfect! They shipped about 3 days after we ordered and gave us a multi wheel discount. As I assume they usually sell 2 at a time for the gas scooters.

01-20-2005 11:26 PM

Andrew Rudolph

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

very nice, howd you attach the tread to the aluminum?

01-20-2005 11:35 PM

Jeff K.

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

Those wheels look really awesome. Did you get the belt from mcmaster or brecoflex? And how much for 4 wheels or however many you purchased?

01-21-2005 12:05 AM

Cory

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

That's wedgetop conveyor belting from McMaster

01-21-2005 12:53 AM

sanddrag

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

I still would like to know how the tread is attached, but I have another question too. Is the area on the wheel underneath the tread totally flat? Or sis you have to do something to it to get the tread to sit in there right?

01-21-2005 01:02 AM

Collmandoman

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

beautiful =)

01-23-2005 12:52 PM

oreocookeee

Re: HELP us get rid of this wheel tread!

what kind of rims are those? how do you get the tread to stick to the rims? my team had a lot of trouble with that two years ago when we tried to cover custom aluminum rims with linitax. sorry to change the subject, but i am curious.

01-23-2005 01:48 PM

russell

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

same here.

06-14-2006 05:11 PM

Billfred

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

I just found this thread again, and I remember how effective they were (grumble grumble ). Out of curiosity since the picture of the wheel doesn't make a means obvious, how were the wheels driven? Live axles? Dead axles? Custom hubs? Fairy dust?

06-14-2006 06:42 PM

sanddrag

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

As far as I can remember they had a sprocket bolted to them and they rode on a dead axle, hence the bearings in the wheels.

06-14-2006 10:47 PM

=Martin=Taylor=

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

Those wheels have bearings in them, which leads me to believe that you will be powering the wheel but not the shaft.

How do you expect to do this? The hubs on those look really small, there's really nothing there but spokes. It looks like it would be hard to attach a sprocket.

Other then that, they look ideal!

06-14-2006 11:16 PM

Andrew Rudolph

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

They already used these wheels back in 05

06-14-2006 11:44 PM

Swampdude

Re: pic: 179 Is riding on 4.5"

better view
Yes the wheels ran on dead axles. We welded a flange to the hub of the rim and had to clean out the Id (from weld deformation) on a lathe to re-seat the bearings back in there. The flange and sprockets were 3/16" aluminum cut on a waterjet. One thing I liked about these was that you could squeeze the bearings by tightening the wheel shaft, and not cause binding - so the wheel spun freely. The dual sprocket wheels just used spacers and longer bolts off those same flanges. Very heavy duty wheels, I'd like to do that again.