|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Team 121 Teaser
26-01-2005 00:25
Max LobovskyLooks like we will be seeing a lot of pretty ridiculous arm joints this year. Double strand #35 is rated at something like 1500 lb working load. (note, we have two single strand #35 for our main arm joint)
26-01-2005 00:30
Arefin Bari
I have a feeling that team 121 is trying to point out that they will have a 4 wheel drive this year by the two sprocket and the chain. And the output shaft there is referred to the transmission output shaft.
-Arefin.
26-01-2005 00:31
russell
Shouldnt you be more worried about your chain slipping than it breaking? We only used one chain last year so im not exactly an expert but it would seem to me that one chain should be plenty for just about anything in FIRST.
26-01-2005 00:32
Cory
It looks like an industrial machine with that paint on it.
Why would you paint your chain anyways? Sounds like a good way to sieze up the links, if you ask me
26-01-2005 00:33
Max LobovskyArefin, that is very unlikely that that is a drive train chain because it is actually one chain, not two, and there is no reason they would need such a monstrous chain for their drive train.
26-01-2005 00:36
Alex1072|
Originally Posted by Cory
It looks like an industrial machine with that paint on it.
Why would you paint your chain anyways? Sounds like a good way to sieze up the links, if you ask me |
26-01-2005 01:38
MrToast
If that's what I think it is, that's very mean.
I approve. 
MrToast
29-01-2005 12:03
roboguy #1Not a bandsaw is it? something that moves similarly to a band saw anything that out in the open is moving not turning a bit or piece.
29-01-2005 15:33
David Guzman
I do agree with Arefin that it looks like a 4 wheels drive train but i dont think that the shaft is the output of a transmition. About the paint it looks nice...
David
29-01-2005 15:56
MrToast
You guys honestly think that's part of the robot after watching American Robot?!
Dave
29-01-2005 20:26
Rob
Ok, you guys are quite astute...It is not actually part of our robot.
I will give 100 points to anyone who can guess what it really is from.. It is on something that we found in the navy warehouse that we work in. It is really big.
Rob
30-01-2005 00:28
MrToast
Can I guess? ![]()
Actually, I don't remember what it is, but i know exactly where it is and what it looks like. ![]()
![]()
Dave
30-01-2005 01:09
Mike Ciance
|
Originally Posted by Rob
I will give 100 points to anyone who can guess what it really is from.. It is on something that we found in the navy warehouse that we work in. It is really big.
|
30-01-2005 01:17
Elgin Clock
Logic says that since only about 10% of the chain is resting on the sprockets, then this is not the actual pivot point for the chain. I believe it is just a chain tensioner we are seeing to reduce flex in the actual chain run. It looks like the actual load bearing drive sprocket would be about a foot (or more) in diameter and located inside the limits of the chain guard guard that is showing in the top right?
As for it's application? I don't know.
Lifting relatively small (as far as Navy boats go) boats out of the water?
30-01-2005 01:22
Max LobovskyWierd thing is, if it isn't a torque transferring sprocket (just an idler or tensioner), why is it keyed?
30-01-2005 11:07
tkwetzel
|
Originally Posted by Max Lobovsky
Wierd thing is, if it isn't a torque transferring sprocket (just an idler or tensioner), why is it keyed?
|
30-01-2005 12:33
Max Lobovsky|
Originally Posted by tkwetzel
To run the shaft on the bearings so they don't put wear on the shaft itself.
|