|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Reworked AM gearbox to fit our application and to use servo to shift.
29-04-2005 13:30
Max LobovskyThat is really cool. I am surprised A&M didn't sell a servo shift version. Was it difficult to adapt one? Also, how much weight did you save with the modifications and removing the cylinder?
29-04-2005 13:38
Mark Jones|
Originally Posted by Max Lobovsky
That is really cool. I am surprised A&M didn't sell a servo shift version. Was it difficult to adapt one? Also, how much weight did you save with the modifications and removing the cylinder?
|
29-04-2005 14:40
Joe Matt
How does the servo hold up? Any problems or irregularaties compared to the pnumatic system? Have you tested it at full speed? I'm just wondering since the servos seem a little more weak and brittle compared to the pnumatic pistons.
29-04-2005 15:09
Swampdude
I saw you adding those plates at Palmetto. Very cool. Seems you guys don't rest. But necessity (weight reduction in this case) breeds invention. When I see this, it makes me want my 2006 AM shifters to come like that. So the question is, say AM decides to make this an option. Do we have to pay 343 (or you Mark) royalties? Or are you going to let Andy and Mark benefit from your creativity? And Andy are you already on this page? Although the steel channel side plates probably help Andy and Mark to sleep at night as far as the safety factor margins. Losing 6 lbs is a big deal... Nice work Mark!
29-04-2005 15:21
Arefin Bari
|
Originally Posted by JosephM
How does the servo hold up?
|
29-04-2005 16:34
Andy Baker
|
Originally Posted by Swampdude
I saw you adding those plates at Palmetto. Very cool. Seems you guys don't rest. But necessity (weight reduction in this case) breeds invention. When I see this, it makes me want my 2006 AM shifters to come like that. So the question is, say AM decides to make this an option. Do we have to pay 343 (or you Mark) royalties? Or are you going to let Andy and Mark benefit from your creativity? And Andy are you already on this page? Although the steel channel side plates probably help Andy and Mark to sleep at night as far as the safety factor margins. Losing 6 lbs is a big deal... Nice work Mark!
|
29-04-2005 17:39
Mark Jones|
Originally Posted by Andy Baker
These are good questions. Mark and team 343 has a great implementation of this idea. Their fork coupling is very elegant.
Keep in mind that there are some prior designs: Matt Reiland and team 226 have shifted their dog gears with servos for a couple of years. Also, back in 2000, we (team 45) shifted the Bosch gearbox with a servo. We at AndyMark are working on a new, improved, cheaper AM Shifter for 2006. However, we still will offer our 2005 version. Andy B. |
29-04-2005 18:05
Conor Ryan
very elegant combination of 2 great ideas, servo shifting and the AM gearbox. Do you have any of that in a cad? I'd like to see how you designed the shifting mechanism, as simple as it is.
29-04-2005 22:51
Swampdude
|
Originally Posted by Mark Jones
Dan...Andy's right. If you purchased some DeWalt gearboxes and adapted them for another application, would you pay royalties to DeWalt or Joe Johnson???
|
07-12-2005 19:02
ChuckDickerson|
Originally Posted by Andy Baker
We at AndyMark are working on a new, improved, less expensive AM Shifter for 2006. However, we still will offer our 2005 version.
Andy B. |
07-12-2005 19:20
greencactus3|
Originally Posted by Arefin Bari
there are 2 holes on each side of the servo ... They are screwed on to that aluminum plate with 4 screws.
|
07-12-2005 19:20
Andrew Blair
I think it materialized into their new single speed transmission, maybe citing cost to make/assemble, or robustness.
http://www.andymark.biz/am-gearbox.htm
07-12-2005 19:33
sanddrag|
Originally Posted by DeepWater
Andy,
Is the "new, improved, less expensive AM shifter for 2006" still in the works? If so, any idea when will it be ready for the street? Maybe a sneaky peeky pic or two could dift on to this thread???? Jan 7th is just around the corner... |
07-12-2005 22:37
Jonathan Norris
My team, 610, has been researching into different gearbox's and were planing on ordering one of the AM 2-speed gearbox's until I can across this information about a newer design. I was wondering if you could give us a time frame of when these gearbox's will be available, before new year? and possibly a price range, will it be silmilar to the older version?
07-12-2005 22:48
sanddragYou guys, I don't think there will be any new design for 2006 other than what you currently see on the site. What you see is what you get, and at the price you see. Hopefully Andy will come along and give the official word, but I believe their full 2006 product line is exactly as you see it on the site. I haven't heard of any further big new releases.
EDIT: I stand corrected. (see below) 
07-12-2005 22:52
Conor Ryan
|
Originally Posted by DeepWater
Andy,
Is the "new, improved, less expensive AM shifter for 2006" still in the works? If so, any idea when will it be ready for the street? Maybe a sneaky peeky pic or two could dift on to this thread???? Jan 7th is just around the corner... |
07-12-2005 22:53
ChuckDickersonHence why I revived an old thread and asked the question and addressed it directly to Andy Baker 