|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
26-07-2005 00:16
Jverdon
thats awesome...but i think blue won lol, what was that 71 behind you that did that lol. just kidding great robot loved the arm design.
26-07-2005 00:18
AnthonySimply amazing. Now I think I recall people back during the season saying robots wouldnt be able to stack higher that 7 or 8 high. Yay defiance.
Impressive arm though. Congrats
26-07-2005 01:26
SizzelChest330ooooo I remember passing by this on my way out of the talent show!
You guys would have capped it fine if it wasnt all leaning back so far...
26-07-2005 08:38
xzvrw2
It was team hammond but not a robot. That stack was all human made. It was funny thought brecause red was the only side working at the time.
26-07-2005 12:36
The CyborgOh yeah! It was our side that had to freeze up, while the red side had it going all out. We didn't want to lose, so we got desperate, and thus it became Man Vs. Machine! Good times....
When 217 tried to cap the goal with that red tetra, gravity kicked it, and the stack started to tilt lethally toward the players stations, and got everybody running.
Good thing the timer stopped the robots before it got any worse.
IRI was so fun. 
26-07-2005 12:42
Paul CopioliWhat that picture doesn't show is the human robots from the blue side trying to block our robot with tetras. We had the tetra just above the stack and some human robots ran around the outside of the arena jammed a blue tetra under the red one causing the stack to tip.
They did scurry like ants from under a rug, though ....
26-07-2005 12:50
Francis-134Sweet job man. We were able to get 11 on the center goal once, but that was witout any interference, and more than 120 seconds of time.
26-07-2005 16:53
Starke
see that The Thunderchickens are still being amazing. great partnering with you guys this year and Finger Lakes.
26-07-2005 17:39
ShaneP
Yeah that was awesome to see. If only the Thunderchickens could have capped it!
Heh, not to be negative, but isn't that stack only 11 tetras? Were you including the bottom one under the goal? If so, then it is 12.
26-07-2005 21:54
Adam Richards
I'm pretty sure that about half of those wouldn't count anyway though because they're too far off center.
26-07-2005 22:58
The Cyborg|
Originally Posted by Adam Richards
I'm pretty sure that about half of those wouldn't count anyway though because they're too far off center.
|
27-07-2005 19:21
EricH
|
Originally Posted by Adam Richards
I'm pretty sure that about half of those wouldn't count anyway though because they're too far off center.
|