|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Rollers are 3/4" diameter 60A polyurethane mounted on 3/16" inner diameter bronze bearings which roll on dowel pins. Effective diameter over the rollers is 4.8 inch. Weight as shown including aluminum hub, roller bearing, and 30 tooth schedule 35 steel sprocket is 1.75 lb. We plan to build a holonomic drivetrain using four of these wheels and demonstrate it at St. Louis Regional Fall training camp in November.
04-08-2005 20:12
rangersteveWow. That looks really good and tough. Have you weighed it?
Hi, Mr. Wallace, this is steve (team 931, design, tall). We need to get moving on the project.
04-08-2005 20:20
mechanicalbrain
I'm curious about the actual benefit of dual wheels. Also what material are your rollers and how well do they work. If anyone has ideas for good materials for rollers that can be easily shopped i would really appreciate you sending me a message. I need something with a fair amount of traction on carpet but wont cause enough friction to cause trouble with rolling.
04-08-2005 20:44
Richard Wallace
|
Originally Posted by rangersteve
Wow. That looks really good and tough. Have you weighed it?
Hi, Mr. Wallace, this is steve (team 931, design, tall). We need to get moving on the project. |
| Rollers are 3/4" diameter 60A polyurethane mounted on 3/16" inner diameter bronze bearings which roll on dowel pins. Effective diameter over the rollers is 4.8 inch. Weight as shown including aluminum hub, roller bearing, and 30 tooth schedule 40 steel sprocket is 1.75 lb. We plan to build a holonomic drivetrain using four of these wheels and demonstrate it at St. Louis Regional Fall training camp in November. |
04-08-2005 20:53
Richard Wallace
|
Originally Posted by mechanicalbrain
I'm curious about the actual benefit of dual wheels. Also what material are your rollers and how well do they work. If anyone has ideas for good materials for rollers that can be easily shopped i would really appreciate you sending me a message. I need something with a fair amount of traction on carpet but wont cause enough friction to cause trouble with rolling.
|
04-08-2005 21:28
spears312
One of the nicer omni wheels I have seen. Certainly looks more durable than many of the ones I have seen. Great job.
04-08-2005 22:43
Greg McCoyThe TechnoKats used a similar wheel on the 2005 robot. For the front wheels we used a pair of off-the-shelf AndyMark 6" omni wheels attached together with a custom hub, similar to this. The rear wheels were simple 4" rubber wheels. Nice work!
05-08-2005 03:03
team222badbrad
|
Originally Posted by mechanicalbrain
I'm curious about the actual benefit of dual wheels. Also what material are your rollers and how well do they work. If anyone has ideas for good materials for rollers that can be easily shopped i would really appreciate you sending me a message. I need something with a fair amount of traction on carpet but wont cause enough friction to cause trouble with rolling.
|
05-08-2005 11:16
Alan Anderson
|
Originally Posted by mechanicalbrain
I'm curious about the actual benefit of dual wheels.
|
06-08-2005 10:12
Richard Wallace
|
Originally Posted by team222badbrad
By the way nice wheels, what kind of machine did you use to make the plates?
I hope you are using them with a cool drive-train! |
04-12-2005 18:32
Dan Richardson
The extra contact points in having dualed wheels also help disperse the load for the left to right skidding. We used dual wheels like that for our holonomic ( 1083 Team Emoticons, responsible for the odd " this is how we roll " team advertisement last year at nationals. ) wheels last year ( modified andy-marks ) and it worked wonderfuly. Only problem we ran into was on the sometimes when applying power to the left and right the rubber wheels would bind up against the alluminum when a side tress was put on them. This is not good for holonomic as it provides an additional friction to overcome makes for jerky movements and difficult to keep straight due to the traction issues.
We ended up milling the slots a bit larger in order to places washers in to keep the rubber wheels firm and sliding easier. I don't see this problem occuring with these omni wheels because of the bronze bushings placed on each side seem like they will be able to keep the rubber wheels spinning freely.
Good luck I'd love to see the finished product hopefully you'll post some pictures. I don't have any pictures of our modified wheels or our finished product but omni directional is deffinately a lot of fun.
04-12-2005 21:05
Richard Wallace
|
Originally Posted by Stud Man Dan
We ended up milling the slots a bit larger in order to places washers in to keep the rubber wheels firm and sliding easier. ...
Good luck I'd love to see the finished product hopefully you'll post some pictures. I don't have any pictures of our modified wheels or our finished product but omni directional is deffinately a lot of fun. |
04-12-2005 22:35
Rohan_DHS
i gotta pretty newb-ish question...what is the advantage of an omni wheel over a regular wheel...is it traction?

04-12-2005 22:45
Pat Fairbank|
Originally Posted by Rohan_DHS
i gotta pretty newb-ish question...what is the advantage of an omni wheel over a regular wheel...is it traction?
![]() |
04-12-2005 23:12
Tristan Lall|
Originally Posted by Rohan_DHS
i gotta pretty newb-ish question...what is the advantage of an omni wheel over a regular wheel...is it traction?
|
ΣFy = 2 F sin(45°) + 2 F sin(135°) (Force in y-dir)For the simple case of driving forward, you get an efficiency of around 70% in the driving direction, and (of course) 0% in the perpendicular direction. As the output to each wheel varies in a holonomic drive system, the components move, but in general, either the efficiency suffers, or the total power does (as in, two wheels fully forward, and two fully perpendicular—50% power, but 100% efficiency). The same goes for mecanum wheels, in a conventional configuration.
ΣFx = 2 F cos(45°) + 2 F cos(135°) (Force in x-dir)
ηy = ΣFy / 4 F (Efficiency in y-dir)
ηx = ΣFx / 4 F (Effiiciency in x-dir)
04-12-2005 23:48
Richard Wallace
Recently posted images. Top view, bottom view, and first test run.
Next we plan to try other roller materials, aiming for better traction than we obtained using polyurethane. Maybe gum rubber, as team222badbrad recommended earlier in this thread.
05-12-2005 00:09
JVNI was recently in St. Louis for a conference, and got the chance to see (and drive) this omni-drive prototype. I was REALLY impressed. It handled incredibly. If the 2006 game requires omni-directional motion, this design could be an awesome competitior on the field.
The design & construction techniques were also very cool. A lot of work and attention to detail went into this machine. I hope I see it on the field sometime soon.
Kudos!
-JV
05-12-2005 10:38
mechanicalbrain
Has anyone considered a second set of omni wheels (or a ball) in the center of the robot so the weight is evenly distributed. They need not be powered. The other thing I'm curious about is the use of different surfaces. I see some mention of using different materials and I have seen some work done on roller surfaces (the grenade wheels come to mind though I don't think that was for traction) but has anyone really experimented with different surfaces?