|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Another animation still frame (spoof?) by the great Lavery.
12-28-2005 12:24 PM
Elgin Clock
Just so no one freaks out about another "new" field picture, this was taken from
THIS POST that since then has a broken link, from the thread Curling + Robots = Sweeet
That is all.
12-28-2005 12:26 PM
Tom BottiglieriThose models are from the 2003 game.
Not like that piece of information has anything to do with anything... 
12-28-2005 12:28 PM
Billfred
|
Originally Posted by Tom Bottiglieri
Those models are from the 2003 game.
Not like that piece of information has anything to do with anything... ![]() |
12-28-2005 12:38 PM
Tom Bottiglieri|
Originally Posted by Billfred
Not exactly.
The far blue robot is from FIRST Frenzy, while the other five (as well as the field structure itself) are all from the Triple Play animation. |
12-28-2005 10:20 PM
Ryan Foley
|
Originally Posted by Tom Bottiglieri
Eh.
You're right. Billfred - 1, Tom - 0. |
12-29-2005 12:11 AM
Alex Burman
they are all generic FIRST animation robots
Alex- 1 Ryan -1/2, Billfred-1/4, Tom-0
12-29-2005 01:25 AM
dlavery
Just to set the record straight:
- the three red robots appeared in the 2005 animation
- the blue tripod robot appeared in the 2005 animation
- the blue "long arm" robot in the bacl appeared in the 2004 and 2005 animation, but not in 2003 (the 2003 robot was a cousin of this one, but it was not the same)
- the short blue bulldozer robot was in the 2003, 2004 and 2005 animations (and who knows where he may appear next...)
So that means the score is:
Tom - 1/6 (only one was in the 2003 animation)
Billfred - 5/6 (it really bothers me that you know this stuff this well)
Ryan - 3/6 (points off for incorrect identification)
Alex - 0/6 (there is nothing generic about these little guys, they are all special in their own individual ways [at least, that is what my grandmother used to say, and I always believed her*])
I can't believe we are even having this discussion... Don't you all have something else to do??! 
-dave
* except for that part about how "dogs can breathe underwater, just not for very long."
12-29-2005 02:04 AM
Greg Marra
|
Originally Posted by dlavery
* except for that part about how "dogs can breathe underwater, just not for very long."
|
12-29-2005 10:31 AM
Billfred
|
Originally Posted by dlavery
I can't believe we are even having this discussion... Don't you all have something else to do??!
![]() |
12-29-2005 12:31 PM
Ryan Foley
|
Originally Posted by dlavery
Just to set the record straight:
So that means the score is: Tom - 1/6 (only one was in the 2003 animation) Billfred - 5/6 (it really bothers me that you know this stuff this well) Ryan - 3/6 (points off for incorrect identification) Alex - 0/6 (there is nothing generic about these little guys, they are all special in their own individual ways [at least, that is what my grandmother used to say, and I always believed her*]) I can't believe we are even having this discussion... Don't you all have something else to do??! ![]() -dave |
12-29-2005 09:43 PM
Rich Kressly
|
Originally Posted by dlavery
Just to set the record straight:
- the three red robots appeared in the 2005 animation - the blue tripod robot appeared in the 2005 animation - the blue "long arm" robot in the bacl appeared in the 2004 and 2005 animation, but not in 2003 (the 2003 robot was a cousin of this one, but it was not the same) - the short blue bulldozer robot was in the 2003, 2004 and 2005 animations (and who knows where he may appear next...) So that means the score is: Tom - 1/6 (only one was in the 2003 animation) Billfred - 5/6 (it really bothers me that you know this stuff this well) Ryan - 3/6 (points off for incorrect identification) Alex - 0/6 (there is nothing generic about these little guys, they are all special in their own individual ways [at least, that is what my grandmother used to say, and I always believed her*]) I can't believe we are even having this discussion... Don't you all have something else to do??! ![]() -dave * except for that part about how "dogs can breathe underwater, just not for very long." |
12-30-2005 01:35 AM
dlavery
|
Originally Posted by Rich Kressly
I don't know what's most disturbing about the growing obsession. The long trail of FIRST participants that have taken "Dave Stalking" to a new level or the fact that the NASA executive himself loves it so much, he's compelled to post with this much thought and detail after midnight. I sure hope kickoff comes soon. Otherwise, you're all getting sent for therapy
![]() |
12-30-2005 04:30 AM
sanddrag|
Originally Posted by dlavery
or listen to Brave Combo's "All Wound Up" album for the umpteenth time. When given that choice... well, here I am.
-dave |
The 11th track is "Spaghetti (Twist and Twirl)" and the 12th track is "Home" (auto at the end of the match?) I'm going over to the hint discussion thread.
12-30-2005 07:31 AM
Elgin Clock
Oy...
Track 10: Mayim, Mayim (Water, Water)
Anyways, Dave have you ever heard the cover of Stairway To Heaven by Brave Combo and Tiny Tim?
Pretty hip little diddy.
I found it in late 2003 early 2004 looking for references to the hint for 2004's game.
http://www.brave.com/bo/lyrics/stairhea.htm
The singers' voices totally make the song funny as heck.
12-30-2005 03:31 PM
Starke
although i doubt that this is a clip from the game animation, i must say that the road does vaguely resemble pasta.
12-30-2005 04:16 PM
Rickertsen2
I see this as only one thing and that is proof that lavery likes to feed us bogus pics. The track is not in the style of the rest of the picture and does not look to be made of real materials. In my mind, this pics serves to invalidate the 2007 pic as a shot from the game animation. There may be some clues hidden in both pics, but they are not so obvious.
I don't think i have ever seen lavery mess with us this much in previous years. FALSE RENDERINGS!! GRRRRR
12-30-2005 04:25 PM
Billfred
|
Originally Posted by Rickertsen2
I see this as only one thing and that is proof that lavery likes to feed us bogus pics. The track is not in the style of the rest of the picture and does not look to be made of real materials. In my mind, this pics serves to invalidate the 2007 pic as a shot from the game animation. There may be some clues hidden in both pics, but they are not so obvious.
I don't think i have ever seen lavery mess with us this much in previous years. FALSE RENDERINGS!! GRRRRR |
12-30-2005 04:35 PM
Adam Richards
|
Originally Posted by Billfred
The way I see it, pseudorenderings mean Dave doesn't have as much time to render the game animation, which means Dave can't fit as much into the animation, which means the game has to be easy to explain. That, in turn, makes it more TV-friendly, which gets FIRST on TV, which brings more attention to FIRST, which gets more kids into FIRST, which helps to change the culture.
Keep on rendering, Dave! |
01-15-2007 10:29 PM
I still say that we shouldn't try to analyze anything that dave does. The only reason he does these things is to confuse us more.
Example:
He may have finished rendering before the hint went out, but he didn't want us to know, so he posted the away message.
OR
He didn't finish rendering before the hint and he truthfully posted the away message.
OR
He didn't finish rendering, but knowing that we would know the above two possibilites, he posted the away message to confuse us.
OR
He finished the rendering, but still wanted to confuse us.
And the list goes on.
So i say don't try to analyze Dave Lavery
02-13-2007 02:08 PM
Grogs|
Just to set the record straight:
- the three red robots appeared in the 2005 animation - the blue tripod robot appeared in the 2005 animation - the blue "long arm" robot in the bacl appeared in the 2004 and 2005 animation, but not in 2003 (the 2003 robot was a cousin of this one, but it was not the same) - the short blue bulldozer robot was in the 2003, 2004 and 2005 animations (and who knows where he may appear next...) So that means the score is: Tom - 1/6 (only one was in the 2003 animation) Billfred - 5/6 (it really bothers me that you know this stuff this well) Ryan - 3/6 (points off for incorrect identification) Alex - 0/6 (there is nothing generic about these little guys, they are all special in their own individual ways [at least, that is what my grandmother used to say, and I always believed her*]) I can't believe we are even having this discussion... Don't you all have something else to do??! ![]() -dave * except for that part about how "dogs can breathe underwater, just not for very long." |
02-13-2007 02:11 PM
TD78
02-13-2007 02:28 PM
Grogs
02-13-2007 02:55 PM
Noah Melamedhey guys be careful of the necroposting

02-13-2007 06:34 PM
Dan Zollman|
The long trail of FIRST participants that have taken "Dave Stalking" to a new level...
|
02-13-2007 10:15 PM
dlavery
|
Originally Posted by Rich Kressly
The long trail of FIRST participants that have taken "Dave Stalking" to a new level...
|
|
Originally Posted by Rich Kressly
Otherwise, you're all getting sent for therapy
![]() |
