|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
If you think we are behind schedule, well, then you would be right. Everything is pretty much ready to be attached. By Saturday it should drive, and by Monday it will shoot. Let's hope the programmers (my son is head of the code team) are ready to make it do something by then...
09-02-2006 03:35
Darkswordsmithwow! Very nice chassis, everything strong, sturdy, and...SHINY!!!
that's going to be a beast on the field, but how much does it weigh?
09-02-2006 10:25
Rick TYlerWeight: the raw frame is reported to weigh 15 pounds. The wheels and axles add another 16 or so (I am starting to respect the "small wheel" faction) and the electronics board about a pound. That's 32 pounds as it sits. The official weight spreadsheet shows it weighing about 60 pounds with motors, gears, and chain, but without electronics and the shooter mechanism. Fortunately, the sweeper/shooter is very simple and pretty lightweight. It should come in fine, but it will probably weigh a little too much. Last year, we had to shave 20 ounces at weigh-in.
At least one of mentors doesn't want to add bumpers because he doesn't think we need them. I want to add bumpers because, well, they're free and might preserve our wheel-shaft ends from damage.
09-02-2006 14:18
Greg Ross
|
Originally Posted by Rick TYler
I want to add bumpers because, well, they're free and might preserve our wheel-shaft ends from damage.
|
09-02-2006 21:43
ÉowynHmm... judging from the wheels, you are going for the ramp. Also, the indentaton in the chassis to the rear suggests you are attatching a vertical belt system? to get the balls to your shooter.
Nice strong chassis, but bumpers are probably a good idea.
09-02-2006 22:37
Rick TYler|
Originally Posted by Éowyn
Hmm... judging from the wheels, you are going for the ramp. Also, the indentaton in the chassis to the rear suggests you are attatching a vertical belt system? to get the balls to your shooter.
Nice strong chassis, but bumpers are probably a good idea. ![]() |
09-02-2006 23:00
Andy Baker
|
Originally Posted by Rick TYler
Here's the big question: should we equip the whole team with aviator-style sunglasses?
|
09-02-2006 23:07
Wetzel
|
Originally Posted by Rick TYler
Here's the big question: should we equip the whole team with aviator-style sunglasses?
|
09-02-2006 23:15
RogerR
while i'm a recent convert to small wheels, i'll always have a special place in my heart for those big 'ol beadlok wheels...
i noticed that in addition to being able to slide the front/back wheels horizontally, you can also slide the middle wheels up and down. did you do this so that you could tension the chain? and if so, why not slide the gear boxes?
10-02-2006 02:03
sanddrag|
Originally Posted by RogerR
while i'm a recent convert to small wheels, i'll always have a special place in my heart for those big 'ol beadlok wheels...
|
10-02-2006 02:30
Rick TYler|
Originally Posted by RogerR
i noticed that in addition to being able to slide the front/back wheels horizontally, you can also slide the middle wheels up and down. did you do this so that you could tension the chain? and if so, why not slide the gear boxes?
|
10-02-2006 02:33
Rick TYler|
Originally Posted by sanddrag
I would recommend turning the tread profile flat though. From the factory, they have a pretty small contact patch.
|