|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Team 225 FRC2006 Design
09-02-2006 08:11
Billfred
Looks pretty solid.
Just curious, how do you plan to keep that ramp out of the ball corral? It seems like one good whack from behind would put you in there, and thus put you in danger of a DQ. Of course IANAE, so I may be dead wrong.
Either way, it looks like a winner.
09-02-2006 08:24
Peter Matteson
Looks like a solid design. I like the simplicity.
Out of curiosity what do you plan to use for belting?
09-02-2006 11:29
karpiron|
Originally Posted by Billfred
Looks pretty solid.
Just curious, how do you plan to keep that ramp out of the ball corral? It seems like one good whack from behind would put you in there, and thus put you in danger of a DQ. Of course IANAE, so I may be dead wrong. Either way, it looks like a winner. |
09-02-2006 11:30
karpiron|
Originally Posted by Dzdconfusd
Looks like a solid design. I like the simplicity.
Out of curiosity what do you plan to use for belting? |
09-02-2006 11:44
DjAlamose
|
Originally Posted by karpiron
We have a optical sensor to detect the ALU Goal Ramp.
Automatically opens the door AND prevents driving into the Goal opening. |
09-02-2006 15:15
karpiron|
Originally Posted by DjAlamose
This may help for you driving into the goal but what about other stronger robots pushing you into the goal. It will still be your fault and I can tell you now, if you get to that goal there will be a robot right behind you.
|
09-02-2006 15:21
DjAlamose
An algorithm wont help if the robot behind you moves at 10 inches per minute and has the gripping power of a belt driven not tread driven robot, hint hint*
*not really
09-02-2006 15:25
ChuckDickersonBeautiful design. I love it. It looks like it would be very effective. Just out of curiosity, how are you getting around rules <S03> and <R04>? It looks as if your drawbridge ramp is outside the starting 28x38 foot print thus violating <S03> and it can let down between 0 and 8.5" from the floor violating <R04>. You might want to double check the discussion in this thread.
09-02-2006 15:32
Courtneyb1023From what I understand, assuming that the ramp is just a ramp and isn't propelling it in any way other than gravity, the ramp is within the guidelines of rule <S03>. However, your ramp looks like it is less than 8.5 inches off the ground, and is not within 10 degrees of vertical. Your ramp very well might violate rule <R04>.
09-02-2006 15:38
ChuckDickerson|
Originally Posted by Courtneyb1023
From what I understand, assuming that the ramp is just a ramp and isn't propelling it in any way other than gravity, the ramp is within the guidelines of rule <S03>.
|
09-02-2006 15:41
karpiron|
Originally Posted by DeepWater
Beautiful design. I love it. It looks like it would be very effective. Just out of curiosity, how are you getting around rules <S03> and <R04>? It looks as if your drawbridge ramp is outside the starting 28x38 foot print thus violating <S03> and it can let down between 0 and 8.5" from the floor violating <R04>. You might want to double check the discussion in this thread.
|
09-02-2006 15:47
Courtneyb1023Sounds good! Great design! I would make the sides of the ramp taller to prevent anything pushing you into the goal, even with the algorithm.
09-02-2006 15:49
ChuckDickerson|
Originally Posted by karpiron
Re: (S03)
We can not use the conveyor while the door opens - separates the two functions.. |
|
Originally Posted by karpiron
Re: (R04)
Our door rotation is limited so that the front face is not more than 5 degrees from vertical. |
09-02-2006 20:31
KTorak
Is 5 degrees enough slope to move the balls in quickly enough?...Just a thought. As for being pused in, I would also make the sides of the "ramp" taller so it gives you some kind of protection from going into the goal. Again, just anouther thought. But it appears to be a very solid and simple design with the potential to be a big scorer.