|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
16-02-2006 15:37
Lil' Lavery
No ground loading?
Sweet looking product, can't wait to see you at VCU (if not saturday's building museum scrimmage).
16-02-2006 15:38
enderanjinHow thin is it? On the top it looks like one balls-width and it gets wider with every section. It doesn't look like it fills the dimensions that way at the wheelbase, does it? The pictures is slightly deceptive.
16-02-2006 15:38
Madison
I'm curious why y'all geared your shooter motor down through the kit transmission and then back up again through sprockets.
16-02-2006 15:40
Lil' Lavery
|
Originally Posted by M. Krass
I'm curious why y'all geared your shooter motor down through the kit transmission and then back up again through sprockets.
|
16-02-2006 15:45
Crebb
We have a line of balls that fall down in levels. I will post a picture from the front later to give a better example. We used the kit transmission to gear down and then back up because we wanted to use something we already had to power the wheel, so we started playing around with it and ended up using it. It also gives a good way to adjust the tension in the chain.
16-02-2006 16:10
Joe Matt
Sexy, although I do miss the good ole silver Sparky's myself.
Also, why don't you guys use the flags we made for Sparky 5.0? Much nicer than that one. I guess it's a Turner ego thing any.
Looking great James. I'll have to get down to Richmond sometime to check it out for myself.
16-02-2006 16:17
Rick TYlerI've been wondering about designs like yours. That wheel must be spinning something like 2,000 rpm, right? How well does the chain work at that speed? I always think of normal chains running at fairly modest RPMs and don't have personal experience with bicycle-style chains running that fast. (Although I know I've had cam chains in cars that would run at 6,000+ RPM, but I assume they were designed for that.) We are using timing belts instead of chains, mostly to save weight up high, but I am curious to see the chain-driven systems.
Good luck in your competition(s).
16-02-2006 17:24
A.LathropNice design.
Hope to see ya'll at VCU or DC at the scrimmage!
Peace out
Alan
Team 1033
16-02-2006 18:44
Koko Ed
So are you guys going to go up the ramp?
16-02-2006 18:48
Crebb
Yes, we can succcessfully get on top of the ramp. It took some extra thought and a lot of second guessing with the 4" wheels, but we can get up on top.
16-02-2006 21:46
bombadier337Looking great guys, hope we can get paired up again like last year. We'll probably see you at the DC scrimmage again this year. Best of luck this season, can wait till VCU and Nationals!
19-02-2006 21:09
Nice job on your robot guys
looks great.
-Court-
20-02-2006 19:34
A.LathropWhat percentage are you getting up the ramp?
20-02-2006 20:21
Freddy Schurr
How tall is it? It looks like it exceeds the limit for FIRST!
20-02-2006 22:35
Crebb
|
Originally Posted by Freddy204
How tall is it? It looks like it exceeds the limit for FIRST!
|
21-02-2006 07:46
TimothyMVery nice Team 384! Are you able to sweep? Are you able to spill into lower goals? Who's your human player this year?
I look forward to seeing everyone from Team 384 in Richmond.
28-02-2006 13:40
Saton472Nice job guys. Freemen (1545 Little Skeeter) didn't have enough people to build this year so I'm gonna volunteer at VCU. hope to see you guys there