|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Sometime after crating in Houston, something massive came crushing through our crate lid and wiped out the front of the robot plus the frame and one transmission on the right side. A huge thanks goes out to the two teams who each answered the call for kop frame rails. I'll post pictures taken exactly 24 hours later.
05-03-2006 05:28 PM
Joe Matt
WHERE DID IT ALL GO?
05-03-2006 05:30 PM
henryBsick
!?!?!
Did you recieve any contact of any kind from the shipping company?
05-03-2006 05:32 PM
miketwalker
What did the shipping company have to say about this happening?
05-03-2006 06:21 PM
sanddragWhat in the world happened!?!? That is insane! Details please!
05-03-2006 06:58 PM
Dan PetrovicWho can honestly sleep after being a part of something like this?
The shipping companies are being paid big bucks to safely transport expensive machines that students spend hundreds of hours building, and this is how they treat the crates?
05-03-2006 07:00 PM
travis48elite
THAT IS A TEAM'S WORST NIGHTMARE! That would leave me speechless and at the same time crying!
05-03-2006 07:18 PM
Rohan_DHS
OMG! Are you guys getting any sort of reimbursement for it???? Has anyone taken responsibility for it??
05-03-2006 07:18 PM
spears312
First I saw a pic of a robot who's crate fell apart (and survived) now a pic of a robot nearly obliterated by something crushing it. That looks pretty bad but I suppose it got fixed. Did they mention exactly what caused that damage?
05-03-2006 07:19 PM
Koko Ed
Someone.Is.Getting.Sued.
05-03-2006 07:19 PM
Jay H 237
Was the crate actually crushed from the outside or was the damage done by other stuff shipped within the crate? I ask because the visible walls of the crate appear intact and still square in the pic.
Do you have any pics of the overall crate?
05-03-2006 08:10 PM
Kevin Sevcik
Secondhand info here until the Toltechs get back. From what I heard, it seemed like something large and heavy dropped through the top of the crate. And then someone removed whatever it was and replaced the crate top with a new piece of plywood.
05-03-2006 08:47 PM
KenWittlief
ok, so I guess its time for FIRST to either
A. host a crate design contest. Points awarded on cost, amount of weight the crate can support on its top before it collapses, how far it can be dropped before it breaks open, and simplicity of construction. Winning design becomes the standard FIRST robot crate
or
2. supply a baseline crate design like they do for the low cost field design
?
05-03-2006 08:50 PM
JaneYoung
I think those are a couple of swell ideas, Ken.
|
Originally Posted by KenWittlief
ok, so I guess its time for FIRST to either
A. host a crate design contest. Points awarded on cost, amount of weight the crate can support on its top before it collapses, how far it can be dropped before it breaks open, and simplicity of construction. Winning design becomes the standard FIRST robot crate or 2. supply a baseline crate design like they do for the low cost field design ? |
05-03-2006 08:57 PM
Ellery
Yeah Crate design that is robust and light is a challenge. Our crates have been pretty robust for years but the budget reductions have brought us to a point were every once counts. We've been looking for some type of lightweight crate that can support another 600# crate stacked on top of it. Right now our robot crate is 277# empty so just adding the robot with the controllwe already makes us over the 400 # limit.
I'll have to think of something this summer.
Ellery
05-03-2006 09:05 PM
KenWittlief
Next year, along with all the other robot requirements, they can add:
R073: The robot must be 56" tall when bolted into its crate, and able to support 600 lbs through its frame with up to 2gs of vertical acceleration, for up to 300 hours.
(problem solved!)
05-03-2006 09:24 PM
Kyle Love
Did anyone else see the crated with the hole in the side of it in Atlanta? It was by the exit of the field by the parts table. It had a huge hole in the side of it.
05-03-2006 09:47 PM
Andrew Schuetze|
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik
Secondhand info here until the Toltechs get back. From what I heard, it seemed like something large and heavy dropped through the top of the crate. And then someone removed whatever it was and replaced the crate top with a new piece of plywood.
|
05-04-2006 01:51 AM
Gabe
This is really unacceptable. Accidents do happen, but from what I have read the shipping company is saying that it received the crate damaged, and you know it was intact when you shipped it. So it sounds like this is a blame game. I don't think I could take it as well as you have. It it had been my robot, I would really be angry. (There are a few words I would want to add, but I'm not allowed to say them on this forum)
What came first: the student or the mentor?
05-04-2006 07:36 AM
b-rantyeah i didn't like that shipping company "yellow transportation" at houston i was calling everyday telling them that they haven't shipped our crates off and they said it was impossible for them to still have our crates and then one day i was furious and demanded to talk to the higher up and it turns out he found where they were at while on the phone with me and he said "holy crap.....can you call us back" lol so then 2 days later we got our robot but that company didn't seem that professional
05-04-2006 08:44 AM
JulieB
What was so freaky was it happen on the same aisle as our crate being demanded.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=47125
05-04-2006 09:06 AM
KenWittlief
|
Originally Posted by JulieB
What was so freaky was it happen on the same aisle as our crate being demanded.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=47125 |
05-04-2006 12:57 PM
Barry Bonzack
My props to your team to immediately start figuring out ways to fix the problem instead of going on a rampage of a blame fist. Fix robot first, point finger later (if at all needed). A lesser group of people would give up at a sight like this. What a great show of character of your team and the teams that helped you!
05-04-2006 04:31 PM
d.courtney
heres an idea to save a robot in the future ... packing peanuts.... I can see it now, getting to a competition and as every team uncrates thousands of small packing peanuts fill the pits floor... ok maybe the idea is a bit flawed, but humurous non the less... so other then the clean up (which would be rather fun what do you think? (I suggested it to my team while packing this year, but they wouldn't hear it)... and now for the real question... what amount of damage could be saved from packing peanuts?
05-04-2006 04:42 PM
Kevin Sevcik
|
Originally Posted by d.courtney
heres an idea to save a robot in the future ... packing peanuts.... I can see it now, getting to a competition and as every team uncrates thousands of small packing peanuts fill the pits floor... ok maybe the idea is a bit flawed, but humurous non the less... so other then the clean up (which would be rather fun what do you think? (I suggested it to my team while packing this year, but they wouldn't hear it)... and now for the real question... what amount of damage could be saved from packing peanuts?
|
You think something that did that to a robot would even blink at a bunch of packing peanuts?
05-04-2006 05:06 PM
Katie Reynolds
Oh, man. This is why you insure your package through the shipping company. We insured our crate for $4000 (the cost of the robot plus the crate materials) just in case something like this happened - did you? =
05-04-2006 07:49 PM
pacoliketacoOMG! i feel very sorry for you. what are you going to do with the shipping company? This was Fed-Ex right? because that would be the free shipping that FIRST supplies, so the FIRST community needs to do something about that.
Also, our crate might have been dropped, not our robot, but our supplies, because the wheels on our cart went straight through the bottom.
05-04-2006 10:43 PM
KTorak
I wish that the shipping companies would realize the how much work actually went into building these robots. I wish I could also run a test next year with our robot and add some sensors to monitor its up and down/side to side movement during shipping just to see how rough it really is.
05-04-2006 10:50 PM
d.courtney
|
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik
You think something that did that to a robot would even blink at a bunch of packing peanuts?Seriously, though. Packing peanuts are mostly intended to keep objects from violently shifting during transport. When you're trying to protect something from being crushed, you mostly put big "Do not crush" and "Fragile" stickers on it. And little pyramid things that get smashed and let you know that someone has put something on top of it. Or you build a box that can support 600 lbs on top of it and hope they don't try to put 800 lbs on top of it. |
05-05-2006 01:19 AM
Mike AA|
Originally Posted by KTorak
I wish that the shipping companies would realize the how much work actually went into building these robots. I wish I could also run a test next year with our robot and add some sensors to monitor its up and down/side to side movement during shipping just to see how rough it really is.
|
05-05-2006 08:24 AM
KenWittlief
there are little devices you can buy that you put on the outside or inside of shipping containers
to see if it gets tipped, dropped.... and how much shock and vibration the container receives in transit
05-05-2006 08:59 AM
Tomasz Bania|
Originally Posted by KenWittlief
there are little devices you can buy that you put on the outside or inside of shipping containers
to see if it gets tipped, dropped.... and how much shock and vibration the container receives in transit |
05-05-2006 09:41 AM
KenWittlief
Ive seen them on shipping docks, I dont have any supplier names or costs.
The simple ones are stick-on things, almost like labels, that contain fine colored sand in a narrow clear enclosure. The top of the enclosure is sticky like tape.
so if your container gets tipped the sand ends up stuck in the tape on the top side, and you have a clear indication your shipment was up-ended.
Other similar devices are available that trigger at certain shock and vibration levels. The intent is you can put one on every container you ship (because they are cheap) and it will tell you if the crate has been mishandled. To keep the shipping company from replaceing the ones that were triggered you can put them inside your container.
Obviously if your crate is smashed then you dont need a little device to tell you its been mishandled.
There are more sophisticated electronic devices you can ship in a container that record the shock and vibration of the entire trip, so you can analyse a typical shipment and know what you need to design your shipping containers to withstand.
05-05-2006 05:44 PM
Jay H 237
One of the things you can use to tell if you're crate has been tipped is a Tip-N-Tell. They cost just over a dollar each but there's also a minimum quantity and that's where they'd get you, especially that you're a team shipping a few items not a full scale shipping department. There's many shipping suppliers out there but we mostly use U-Line where I work.
MSC also has some shipping supplies, probably a supplier your team has used for other needs before.
05-05-2006 06:32 PM
Andrew Blair
I'm surprised at the low level of handling of these crates. I realize robot's were smashed and thats terrible, but what about companies who ship stuff Fed-Ex all the time? We are looking at a big pool (1000+ teams shipping stuff 2-5 times apiece) of examples, but the odds are still not real pleasant for an average private user. Looking at the shipping industry at a whole, I would *think* that complaints would force freighters to be more careful. Look at the airline industry: People are very rarely improperly shipped. Airlines tend to get a lot of complaints if that happens.
So, why is this happening? I can think of a few possibilities:
1. Containers are shipped this badly usually. We just need to complain more.
2. Such large containers are not commonly shipped and as a result are not handled carefully.
3. Afflicted crates are not built well, and cannot hold up during normal shipping procedures.
4. Fed-Ex puts a "FIRST ROBOT" sticker on the sides of all the crates and instructs forklift operators to search and destroy.
I kinda like # 4...
05-05-2006 06:36 PM
lukevanoort
After seeing this, I'm tempted to put a hazardous material triangle on the side of our crate saying that it is highly explosive...
05-05-2006 06:53 PM
santosh
Wow. That is horrible. We haven't gotten ours back yet. I am quite scared
05-05-2006 07:24 PM
SURVIVORfan44
I can't believe how damaged the robot is. For my old team, the regionals and championship were just the beginning. The whole life of the robot begins after that when we would show it off to companies and in front of our whole school and everything. I can't imagine how your team is taking this.
07-13-2006 04:48 PM
FreakyAntelopeFor anyone interested in building a lightweight yet strong crate, my team published a white paper this year which is a good, cheap, strong, and light crate. It's also easy to open quickly at competition. About 10 teams in the Boston area used this design, and all of them had no trouble with overage charges, or damage in transit.
The white paper is here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/1781
If you are going to build a new crate, I highly suggest you at least look at this design. If you don't use it exactly, you might be able to take some of it's better features and incorperate it into your own crate.
Maybe that can help prevent some people mishaps in the upcoming season :-P
- Toby, Boston University Overclocked 246
07-14-2006 04:30 AM
Cactus_Robotics|
Originally Posted by Booger
That sucks man
|
02-18-2010 09:35 AM
pilum40|
Yeah Crate design that is robust and light is a challenge. Our crates have been pretty robust for years but the budget reductions have brought us to a point were every once counts. We've been looking for some type of lightweight crate that can support another 600# crate stacked on top of it. Right now our robot crate is 277# empty so just adding the robot with the controllwe already makes us over the 400 # limit.
I'll have to think of something this summer. Ellery |
02-18-2010 09:40 AM
Collin Fultz
|
What do you pack your crate with to protect the bot or do you just stick the robot in the crate and hope it works when you get there? Do y'all use some type of restraining system or packing protective system? I'm a little antsy because of the electronics/CRio, etc. Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks! |
02-18-2010 09:49 AM
Ellery
We typically mount the robot frame to a platform base (so the wheels do not touch the floor) to screw strapping to hold the robot to the platform and then woodscrew the platform to the base of the crate. Pending on the height of the robot and what is hanging out there you'll need to approporiately tie wrap or place filler to keep it from moving. We usually try to pack as many other parts in there to maximize the shipment of stuff on long travel regionals.
02-18-2010 09:53 AM
sgrecoAs part of our weight for withholding parts, my team typically just takes off what might break, then we safely bring it ourselves to the competition.
(Major thread revival, but it is an interesting topic to discuss...I know I fear what might happen when we ship our robot).