|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Digital cameras can do strange things when the target is moving.
No, this guy was not using a trick golf club.
01-06-2006 17:26
Greg Marra
That is pretty nuts. I have never seen anything like that. Once, at the MoS in Boston, I took a picture of the lightning show and there was the top half lit up and the bottom half dim, but I don't know how you would get something like what you have.
Sweet!
01-06-2006 17:31
Richard Wallace
I'm guessing the time that the camera took to scan from the top to the bottom of the image was just about the same as the time it took the golfer to swing the club down.
01-06-2006 18:06
Jonathan Norris
|
Originally Posted by Richard
I'm guessing the time that the camera took to scan from the top to the bottom of the image was just about the same as the time it took the golfer to swing the club down.
|
01-06-2006 18:15
Cuog
the second is actually there for the next person to swing
01-06-2006 20:39
DonRotolo
It's a trick: He is not moving during the photo, he's actually got a club that looks exactly like that. That gap in the club leading to the upper part is held that way by magnetics....
pretty cool.
Don
01-06-2006 21:12
geeknerd99Something to do with the flash curtain-sync?
Dang, that's pretty weird.
01-06-2006 21:17
xzvrw2
i seen it and said woah
haha
pretty sweet
01-06-2006 21:44
anna~marie
I'd almost say you should buy a new camera... but hey I wonder what other kinds of cool pictures you can get with it!
01-06-2006 21:51
Morgan Gillespie|
Originally Posted by Jonathan Norris
I understand that, but why are there 2 golf balls?
|
01-06-2006 22:41
JulieB
One good back swing but then again I really don't understand golf. That is pretty cool.
Four!!
look out breaking golf club that is not actually breaking. 
01-06-2006 23:09
JaneYoung
|
Originally Posted by JulieB
One good back swing but then again I really don't understand golf. That is pretty cool.
Four!! look out breaking golf club that is not actually breaking. ![]() |
02-06-2006 01:29
s_forbesI like how the club is shown in two different positions, but the golfers hands (and the rest of him for that matter) are photographed in one position that does not match either position of the club. It almost seems like someone is trying to trick us...
But after further inspection, it does look like the camera was capturing row by row as the golfer swung. I guess I learned something new today, and that is that digital cameras do work in strange and mysterious ways.
02-06-2006 01:35
MrForbes
if you look close you can see a smear of the head of the club pretty much in line with where it should be for the position the golfer's hands are in. I agree that it's most likely the scan time is about equal to the time it took to move the club from top to bottom, and the picture was taken at just the right time to get both "slow" club positions to show up, but miss most of the "fast" movement of the club at the center of the swing.
02-06-2006 04:09
David BrinzaMaybe the scan is from bottom up and we're looking at the backswing.
If the picture was taken on the downswing, I'd expect the clubhead to be really blurred just before impact with the ball. (In a good golf swing, max clubhead speed should be just as the club is striking the ball).
I think there are some digital cameras where the entire CCD is "gated" for a fixed exposure time and the readout is done after the exposure. You wouldn't see the effect observed in photo - the club would only appear in one portion of the swing, perhaps blurred.
02-06-2006 09:04
Richard Wallace
|
Originally Posted by David Brinza
Maybe the scan is from bottom up and we're looking at the backswing.
If the picture was taken on the downswing, I'd expect the clubhead to be really blurred just before impact with the ball. (In a good golf swing, max clubhead speed should be just as the club is striking the ball) |
02-06-2006 13:54
Rosiebotboss
I'd like to see this try to be duplicated.
Maybe I can conduct some tests during the R^2 Challenge Cup at next week's 5th Annual Tournament of Rosie. <shameless promotion>
Still a few spots left!! see www.team839.com for more information. Or PM me.
02-06-2006 18:06
KenWittlief
a few years back I had my photo taken for my drivers license.
I can only surmize the camera they used scanned your face from left to right, because I was watching someone walking across the room as they took my photo
and it came out with my eyes pointing in different directions, ala Son Of Marty Feldman
thats what was on my drivers license for 4 years!
02-06-2006 18:19
Bill_Hancoc|
Originally Posted by David Brinza
Maybe the scan is from bottom up and we're looking at the backswing.
If the picture was taken on the downswing, I'd expect the clubhead to be really blurred just before impact with the ball. (In a good golf swing, max clubhead speed should be just as the club is striking the ball). I think there are some digital cameras where the entire CCD is "gated" for a fixed exposure time and the readout is done after the exposure. You wouldn't see the effect observed in photo - the club would only appear in one portion of the swing, perhaps blurred. |
02-06-2006 21:17
KenWittlief
there is one aspect of the picture that leads me to think it has been photoshopped to some degree
if the club is captured in different parts of the swing, then why is there no blur in his hands, esp the white glove?
How did he move the club without moving his hands?
something else I just noticed, there is a discontinuity in the club -the upper club does not connect to the 'lower club'
It looks somewhat like strobe light photos with an unsynchronized shutter plane (maybe not really a digital photo?) It looks like the man was shot in the dark with maybe two flashes, and then superimposed onto a photo of the golf course?
theres more going on in this photo than meets the eye.
03-06-2006 09:02
Richard Wallace
|
Originally Posted by KenWittlief
... theres more going on in this photo than meets the eye.
|
03-06-2006 10:29
KenWittlief
ok, if you took the photo then you have a real puzzle on your hands, and as an engineer I expect you to do what engineers do and run some tests on that camera
maybe take photos of a white pole moving diagonally across the image plane, maybe one top to bottom, and one left to right.
Maybe the camera has two CCDs (to get higher resolution) and they are not perfectly synchronized?
Maybe there is a bug in the camera firmware that causes it to not read the CCD from top to bottom. Maybe the capture and hold circuit is not working correctly.
Maybe you had the camera in some weird priority mode that kept the arpeture closed down and slowed the effective shutter speed way down.
Inquisitive minds want answers! :^)
03-06-2006 11:08
Alex Cormier
reminds me of this picture i took at FLR this year.

03-06-2006 15:13
sanddragSome family friends once took a digital picture and it came out weird like this. The camera was set on a table, the timer was set, and then the guy who set the timer ran in to join the group shot. He made it in well before the timer expired and the shot was taken. However, when the picture was viewed, he was transparent (and only him too). I could see the fireplace in detail right behind him even though he was standing in front of it and nothing in the picture was blurred indicating he was moving quickly as the shutter closed. Everything was crystal clear, but he was transparent. It was very strange.
03-06-2006 16:31
Richard Wallace
|
Originally Posted by KenWittlief
ok, if you took the photo then you have a real puzzle on your hands, and as an engineer I expect you to do what engineers do and run some tests on that camera ...
|
03-06-2006 16:40
KenWittlief
|
Originally Posted by sanddrag
...Everything was crystal clear, but he was transparent. It was very strange.
|