|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is an annotated drawing of our Fall project that helps potential sponsors to understand what the different parts we use are, how they work together and why we need their money. 
29-09-2006 07:57
Tristan LallLooks impressive.
A question about the module pivots, though: is there anything inside the frame to reinforce the pivot points? It looks like you've got a 7/8" hole in 1"×1"×1/16" aluminum tube. Especially on the perimeter of the frame, that has the potential to get rather bent during competition, unless reinforced.
While I have your attention, is this intended to be used with a sprung suspension, or a powered mechanism to drive the pivots?
29-09-2006 10:55
Jeremiah HLooks mighty slick. Two questions-
-How's traction/"pushing power" in the front/back and side/side directions?
-How's maneuverability?
Keep us posted on how it works out- our team may be interested in that sort of drive this year.
29-09-2006 12:42
Ben Piecuch
Along with what Tristan said, the frame looks fairly light. I wouldn't be surprised if the frame flexed enough to make do without the drive module pivots. Though, knowing your design skills, I'm assuming you'll have more structure going on top to stiffen the whole assembly, hence, making my point worthless. 
Do you plan on rivetting/welding/bolting the frame?
However, I'm at a loss as to how the tensioning slots work. Since the idler moves with the gearbox module, it seems like all you're doing is changing the tangent point of the chain with the wheel. I would expect the idler to move with respect to the gearbox, or to just use an eccentric idler/guide. That could greatly simplify the entire assembly.
Overall it looks very nice and clean. One of the better Mecanum setups I've seen.
BEN
29-09-2006 12:55
Rich Wong
Excellent CAD drawing.
If I was a potential sponsor, I would briefly like to see a work flow chart, concepts, designs showing different phases of development.
I would also like to know how the parts of the drive Tran can be fabricated, the work plus cost involved with the machining and assembly.
The possible use of outside services to perform any advanced machining of parts, the testing phases and the redesign phase that the teams must go through. Tie it all up with the learning and skills the students are receiving from working on this design.
This all translates to "what am I getting for my sponsorship dollars and how the money benefiting the students."
(That's just my opinion) Again, very nice design.
29-09-2006 12:59
nuggetsyl|
Originally Posted by M. Krass
|
29-09-2006 13:57
Madison
|
Originally Posted by Tristan Lall
Looks impressive.
A question about the module pivots, though: is there anything inside the frame to reinforce the pivot points? It looks like you've got a 7/8" hole in 1"×1"×1/16" aluminum tube. Especially on the perimeter of the frame, that has the potential to get rather bent during competition, unless reinforced. While I have your attention, is this intended to be used with a sprung suspension, or a powered mechanism to drive the pivots? |
|
Originally Posted by Jeremiah H
Looks mighty slick. Two questions-
-How's traction/"pushing power" in the front/back and side/side directions? -How's maneuverability? |
These sorts of drives aren't built for fighting other robots. If you get into a place where your mecanum or omnidirectional drive needs to push another robot, you've probably made a bad decision somewhere, I think. We'll have a better idea for what the traction and losses will be like once we have the wheels on hand -- hopefully by the end of next week.|
Originally Posted by Ben Piecuch
Along with what Tristan said, the frame looks fairly light. I wouldn't be surprised if the frame flexed enough to make do without the drive module pivots. Though, knowing your design skills, I'm assuming you'll have more structure going on top to stiffen the whole assembly, hence, making my point worthless.
Do you plan on rivetting/welding/bolting the frame? However, I'm at a loss as to how the tensioning slots work. Since the idler moves with the gearbox module, it seems like all you're doing is changing the tangent point of the chain with the wheel. I would expect the idler to move with respect to the gearbox, or to just use an eccentric idler/guide. That could greatly simplify the entire assembly. Overall it looks very nice and clean. One of the better Mecanum setups I've seen. |
|
Originally Posted by Rich Wong
Excellent CAD drawing.
If I was a potential sponsor, I would briefly like to see a work flow chart, concepts, designs showing different phases of development. I would also like to know how the parts of the drive Tran can be fabricated, the work plus cost involved with the machining and assembly. The possible use of outside services to perform any advanced machining of parts, the testing phases and the redesign phase that the teams must go through. Tie it all up with the learning and skills the students are receiving from working on this design. This all translates to "what am I getting for my sponsorship dollars and how the money benefiting the students." (That's just my opinion) Again, very nice design. |

|
Originally Posted by nuggetsyl
WOW that kinds looks like our new drive train except our new drive only has a total of 3 wheels. We figured we will need the weight this year for a lifting mech.
|
29-09-2006 19:36
techtiger1I don't think this is as strong as some people think it is there is no cross support for the box tubes that make up the wheel wells, hit the side of that robot enough times it will start to bow in trust me.
29-09-2006 20:30
s_forbesI like your idea for suspension, that was a major problem on our robot last year. We had to go 2 wheel drive to save weight at the last minute, and at all of the matches our robot was out of square (despite our wheel adjustments). It was a real pain to drive.
30-09-2006 13:32
It might just be the way I'm lookin at this, but it seems that all of the rollers on the mecanums are in the same orientation. Isn't the concept of mecanums to have 45 degree offsets?
30-09-2006 13:58
Madison
|
Originally Posted by 114ManualLabor
It might just be the way I'm lookin at this, but it seems that all of the rollers on the mecanums are in the same orientation. Isn't the concept of mecanums to have 45 degree offsets?
|
15-11-2006 21:41
DustinB_3What code are you using for your setup? We're working on a mecanum setup very similar except that we're having problems programming it. Especially turning and strafing at the same time. Sorry if this is a little off topic
01-12-2006 10:34
raileroboticsI was wandering if you made the AndyMark Wheels in inventor or down loaded them from some where? If you made them what did you do to get the angled tabs right. 
01-12-2006 14:59
Madison
I downloaded the model from the AndyMark website.
| What code are you using for your setup? We're working on a mecanum setup very similar except that we're having problems programming it. Especially turning and strafing at the same time. Sorry if this is a little off topic |
01-12-2006 17:15
DustinB_3Currently we are using a modified version of some vex holomonic code that I found on chief delphi. It works but its hard to control and I'm sure there's a more effecient way to do it.