|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Cutaway view of an idea I had that I fleshed out into a design. It will probably never get built, but here's the first revision of the design. All parts are stock parts available from McMaster or SDPSI or are easily machinable on a CNC mill. Opinions are welcome, but if all you're going to say is that it won't work, I don't need to hear that.
Side loads may be an issue, but since the whole thing is riding on roller bearings, I don't think it will be.
Completed, the module runs directly off a CIM, and is bolted to a frame member on both sides (this mounting plate isn't visible here to make the gearing visible), with the wheel part (everything seen here) spinning at a 16:128 reduction. (Stationary planets, driven ring as output/wheel surface.) The wheel surface would be sheet metal with some kind of rubber tread.
31-12-2006 18:51
Gabe
2007 will be a year of robot design innovation.
Go ahead and make a wheel hub that goes right over the bearings and retained with ring clips on each shaft. This way you can remove the planetary gearing if something goes wrong and still use the wheel, or vice versa.
31-12-2006 18:53
Tristan Lall|
Cutaway view of an idea I had that I fleshed out into a design. It will probably never get built, but here's the first revision of the design. All parts are stock parts available from McMaster or SDPSI or are easily machinable on a CNC mill. Opinions are welcome, but if all you're going to say is that it won't work, I don't need to hear that.
Side loads may be an issue, but since the whole thing is riding on roller bearings, I don't think it will be. Completed, the module runs directly off a CIM, and is bolted to a frame member on both sides (this mounting plate isn't visible here to make the gearing visible), with the wheel part (everything seen here) spinning at a 16:128 reduction. (Stationary planets, driven ring as output/wheel surface.) The wheel surface would be sheet metal with some kind of rubber tread. |
31-12-2006 19:26
Madison
|
How are you supporting the outer ring with respect to the planet gears and planet carrier? If your outer ring can wobble about the central axis, you're probably going to encounter a lot of uneven tooth wear. You definitely can't rely upon the tooth mesh to support the weight of the robot.
Also, is the 16 tooth gear hardened steel? Because it probably ought to be. (What's the SDP/SI part number?) |
01-01-2007 13:44
FourPenguins|
How are you supporting the outer ring with respect to the planet gears and planet carrier? If your outer ring can wobble about the central axis, you're probably going to encounter a lot of uneven tooth wear. You definitely can't rely upon the tooth mesh to support the weight of the robot.
Also, is the 16 tooth gear hardened steel? Because it probably ought to be. (What's the SDP/SI part number?) |
01-01-2007 14:45
bear24rwThats crazy ed, post a picture of the whole assembly with the mounting plate.
How much do you estimate it weighs?
looks intense
01-01-2007 14:56
FourPenguinsI posted a new picture here.
Inventor says the weight is around 1.9 pounds (plus CIM and mounting hardware.) I don't trust that number because I haven't double-checked my materials and because it's an inherently rough estimate, but I expect the final to weight in under three pounds, which compares pretty well to the kit gearbox if I remember correctly.