|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
931's preliminary electrical system layout for 2007. Mounting hole pattern is 16"W to suit a 27" wide kitbot chassis. Our initial concept is that this panel could connect to smaller remotely located panels that would serve the arm, pneumatic system, and/or other possible functions via additional 6 AWG circuits wired to the DIN Blocks.
12-01-2007 11:00
MrForbes
Nice, thanks for letting us see what it looks like. Lotsa stuff on there!
The negative terminal post in the top right corner of the picture is not show on the 2007 Robot Power Distribution Diagram, and does not appear to be from the KOP. It also seems to defeat the purpose of the black Power Distribution Block (whatever that purpose might be). Are you sure it's allowed by the rules?
12-01-2007 12:18
Richard Wallace
|
The negative terminal post in the top right corner of the picture is not show on the 2007 Robot Power Distribution Diagram, and does not appear to be from the KOP. It also seems to defeat the purpose of the black Power Distribution Block (whatever that purpose might be). Are you sure it's allowed by the rules?
|
12-01-2007 12:50
MrForbes
<R57> does not seem to specifically address the negative power distribution, but from the specifics of the positive power distribution description, I would feel much safer about passing inspection by using only the new power distribution blocks and fuse panels for all intermediate connections.
12-01-2007 17:32
Mike AAI honestly think that you could simplify your wiring and lose some weight if you moved the din rail closer to the radio and got rid of the stud and crimps. Thus causing one less location for something to come loose. Or better yet use the Negative posts on the smaller breaker panel. Or, I'm not sure if its required to use the din rail but you could totally eliminate the din rail and run the negative to the stud and the positives through the maxi-block.
Just a thought. I dont plan to use additional items.
-Mike
12-01-2007 17:42
Richard Wallace
|
I honestly think that you could simplify your wiring and lose some weight if you moved the din rail closer to the radio and got rid of the stud and crimps. Thus causing one less location for something to come loose. Or better yet use the Negative posts on the smaller breaker panel. Or, I'm not sure if its required to use the din rail but you could totally eliminate the din rail and run the negative to the stud and the positives through the maxi-block.
Just a thought. I dont plan to use additional items. -Mike |
12-01-2007 19:57
clydefrog88
are you using the plywood for your final board? we've saved a lot of weight in the past few years by using 1 or 2ply of hand laid fiberglass on both sides of a balsa core. it weighs almost nothing and is strong enough for a electronics board.
12-01-2007 20:20
Richard Wallace
|
are you using the plywood for your final board? we've saved a lot of weight in the past few years by using 1 or 2ply of hand laid fiberglass on both sides of a balsa core. it weighs almost nothing and is strong enough for a electronics board.
|
13-01-2007 15:25
xghostThe connectors on those speed controllers(red/black)...They seem very nice...look like mini battery connectors and easier than two quick disconnects terminals. Where did you get those? 
13-01-2007 18:31
Richard Wallace
|
The connectors on those speed controllers(red/black)...They seem very nice...look like mini battery connectors and easier than two quick disconnects terminals. Where did you get those?
![]() |
30-01-2007 04:39
DarkswordsmithI'm still not sure whether we can use the negative stud in power distribution. Can anyone give a definite answer?
30-01-2007 06:39
JeremyticeThat electrical layout looks very nice you guys. Great job!
30-01-2007 08:10
Al Skierkiewicz
Richard,
Looks really cool, nice job! I would eliminate the ground stud and return the negative leads directly to the distro block. You save some weight in #6 and crimp on connectors and lower the series resistance, not to mention a single point failure if the stud hardware loosens.
How do you like the crimper and the Power Poles so far? We add a touch of solder to the connector just to be sure, before assembly. They crimp on the #12 Chalupa leads OK as well, but again a touch of solder just to be sure.
30-01-2007 11:36
Richard Wallace
Thanks, Al.
We will probably lose the stud when we compact the layout somewhat -- right now the footprint is still too large. I agree the stud takes up valuable space and is an extra failure point.
Also, I am not sure that the stud is a COTS component. It was in an old (2003? '04?) KoP but I don't think it was custom made for FIRST. Anyway I would need to get a part number and price to show for material cost analysis if we want to use it on the robot.
30-01-2007 13:11
Al Skierkiewicz
Richard,
It seems to me that they were available from Terminal Supply that year.
30-01-2007 14:02
Richard Wallace
|
Richard,
It seems to me that they were available from Terminal Supply that year. |