|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
... here is the beast. In 2 weeks, we will show you what we got on top of that...
21-01-2007 22:44
Alex Cormier
Looking good Arefin! Lemme guess, battery will be in the rear? And possible 1/2 robot lift 12".
21-01-2007 22:46
Adam Richards
I'm calling arm on gearbox-side, ramp on the back.
21-01-2007 23:03
clean399seems like it will be a lifting robot not much ground clearance for going up ramps.
21-01-2007 23:18
Tim Arnold
/me is scared
You guys haven't yet seen the pushing power of this beast... want to move the goal?
21-01-2007 23:41
sdcantrell56That's the first chassis that looks close to as overbuilt as ours.
It's looking pretty good.
22-01-2007 00:54
David Guzman
Looks good,
What material is the plate on the bottom.
David G.
22-01-2007 09:07
Tytus Gerrish
You need to add some structure to resist that square from turning into a diamond. that piece of plastic all the electrical is mounted to isn’t offering any strength to the frame. also. bumpers are a must because there are moving parts exposed on the outside in the "bumper zone" that according to Murphy’s law will get smashed. as well as the front and rear being made of 1/8" thick c-channel offer little resistance to collapse upon impact. it would be a large benefit to add some central strength members to resist against that
22-01-2007 12:24
David Guzman
|
that piece of plastic all the electrical is mounted to isn’t offering any strength to the frame.
|
22-01-2007 13:02
Jetgrindradio00Nice setup. Looks like the top is exactly 4" of the ground. I wonder why?
22-01-2007 13:08
Stephen Kowski|
as well as the front and rear being made of 1/8" thick c-channel offer little resistance to collapse upon impact. it would be a large benefit to add some central strength members to resist against that
|
22-01-2007 14:46
Tytus Gerrish
|
you run any numbers on that? I'm not so confident on your structural collapse theory....
|
22-01-2007 16:26
Conor Ryan
Questions for the nicest looking chassis and drive train in awhile (I haven't seen Tytus's waterjetted one yet)
22-01-2007 16:30
Stephen Kowski|
i didnt run numbers per say but i ran 179's 2004 robot at 12 feet/second into a mobile goal 10 seconds into it's existance and smashed the 1/8" c-channel in. bent! broken frame! misaligned wheels! it was a mess
|
22-01-2007 16:35
Ryan Dognaux
So are the wheels near the battery powered at all? Interesting placement of your gearboxes there. I want to see some video of this in action asap Arefin 
22-01-2007 19:04
Tytus Gerrish
|
Questions for the nicest looking chassis and drive train in awhile (I haven't seen Tytus's waterjetted one yet)
|
22-01-2007 19:39
Conor Ryan
22-01-2007 21:26
Chris FultzArefin,
it appears you are using that messsy coil of tubing to provide extra air accumulation, a clear rules violation if i ever saw one. i am disappointed in you and may volunteer to be an inspector at one of your regionals just so I can DQ you.
ps - please volunteer for the iri so i can make you in charge of cleaning up trash as punishment for poor behavior.
(cool chassis, anyway)
22-01-2007 22:34
Arefin Bari
Alright, I am going to try to answer everyone’s questions…
|
Looking good Arefin! Lemme guess, battery will be in the rear? And possible 1/2 robot lift 12".
|
|
seems like it will be a lifting robot not much ground clearance for going up ramps.
|
|
/me is scared
You guys haven't yet seen the pushing power of this beast... want to move the goal? |
|
That's the first chassis that looks close to as overbuilt as ours.
It's looking pretty good. |
Looks good,What material is the plate on the bottom. David G. |
|
You need to add some structure to resist that square from turning into a diamond. that piece of plastic all the electrical is mounted to isn’t offering any strength to the frame. also. bumpers are a must because there are moving parts exposed on the outside in the "bumper zone" that according to Murphy’s law will get smashed. as well as the front and rear being made of 1/8" thick c-channel offer little resistance to collapse upon impact. it would be a large benefit to add some central strength members to resist against that
|
|
Nice setup. Looks like the top is exactly 4" of the ground. I wonder why?
![]() |
|
Questions for the nicest looking chassis and drive train in awhile (I haven't seen Tytus's waterjetted one yet)
|
|
So are the wheels near the battery powered at all? Interesting placement of your gearboxes there. I want to see some video of this in action asap Arefin
![]() |
|
Arefin,
it appears you are using that messsy coil of tubing to provide extra air accumulation, a clear rules violation if i ever saw one. i am disappointed in you and may volunteer to be an inspector at one of your regionals just so I can DQ you. ps - please volunteer for the iri so i can make you in charge of cleaning up trash as punishment for poor behavior. (cool chassis, anyway) |