|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is a quick rendering of our lifting mechanism after it's been released. Hopefully this will better illustrate how things work under the hood, so to speak.
The robot will have one on each side. The final height above the floor is approximately 14" under no load.
01-02-2007 14:12
dtengineering
Brilliant... I know where I want to park when we get to Portland!
Jason
01-02-2007 14:18
Guy DavidsonI call this parking lot in SVR.
Looks pretty sweet.
-Guy
01-02-2007 14:22
Dantvman27One Word
DANG!
(in a good sense)
01-02-2007 14:26
s_forbesGreat looking cad model! Out of curiosity, is the material that the platform is made out of going to be transparent? I can imagine that it would be difficult to see what was going on on the field with those things folded up.
01-02-2007 15:10
Dan PetrovicWe had this idea earlier on but it was scrapped because we decided not to lift.
It's a very nice, easy, and safe way to lift. I like it.
01-02-2007 15:50
fluffywe also tought of doing it at one time, I even drew it up in inventor, but since then, our team has decided on a lighter design
01-02-2007 16:45
114 looks forward to working with you guys at both PNW and SVR! Looks very good! How long does it take to lift up a 120 pound robot to full height? Also, are there any dimensions on the total size of this platform? I'm very curious as to how easy it will be to drive onto this platform.
01-02-2007 16:56
Madison
|
Great looking cad model! Out of curiosity, is the material that the platform is made out of going to be transparent? I can imagine that it would be difficult to see what was going on on the field with those things folded up.
|
|
114 looks forward to working with you guys at both PNW and SVR! Looks very good! How long does it take to lift up a 120 pound robot to full height? Also, are there any dimensions on the total size of this platform? I'm very curious as to how easy it will be to drive onto this platform.
|
01-02-2007 17:11
ChuckDickersonMadison,
The lift looks really nice. We have been mocking up a couple of different similar designs using gas shocks and I have a couple of questions. First, in your design what keeps the two tall pieces of channel from just bending over? Second, (this is more of a rules interpretation question) are you placing any material between the bottom two pieces of metal (channel? Box tube?) and the carpet? I ask only because we are wondering if we need to so ast to not violate <R34> (the no metal touching carpet rule). I guess it depends on what is meant by a "traction device".
|
<R34> ROBOT wheels, tracks, and other parts intended to provide traction on the playing field may be purchased or fabricated (“traction devices” include all parts of the ROBOT that are designed to transmit any propulsive and/or braking forces between the ROBOT and the playing field). In no case will traction devices that damage the carpet or other playing surfaces be permitted. Traction devices can not have surface features such as metal, sandpaper, hard plastic studs, cleats, or other attachments. Anchors (i.e. devices that are deployed/used to keep one’s ROBOT in one place and prevent if from being moved by another ROBOT) can not use metal in contact with the carpet or other playing surfaces to “stay put.” Gaining traction by using adhesives or Velcro-like fastener material is not allowed. |
01-02-2007 18:07
Madison
|
Madison,
The lift looks really nice. We have been mocking up a couple of different similar designs using gas shocks and I have a couple of questions. First, in your design what keeps the two tall pieces of channel from just bending over? Second, (this is more of a rules interpretation question) are you placing any material between the bottom two pieces of metal (channel? Box tube?) and the carpet? I ask only because we are wondering if we need to so ast to not violate <R34> (the no metal touching carpet rule). I guess it depends on what is meant by a "traction device". |

01-02-2007 18:51
Fred Sayre|
Madison,
The lift looks really nice. We have been mocking up a couple of different similar designs using gas shocks and I have a couple of questions. First, in your design what keeps the two tall pieces of channel from just bending over? Second, (this is more of a rules interpretation question) are you placing any material between the bottom two pieces of metal (channel? Box tube?) and the carpet? I ask only because we are wondering if we need to so ast to not violate <R34> (the no metal touching carpet rule). I guess it depends on what is meant by a "traction device". |
01-02-2007 19:39
T3_1565our design for lifting is fairly similar to that, but I must say your picture is better than ours lol very nice! Hope to see you guys at atlanta! *crosses fingers*
01-02-2007 19:52
Manoel
Looks great, as well as the rest of the robot, but I have a few questions - not sure if I completely understood your system.
Are the gas shocks preloaded, and then released to lift (launch?
) another robot? If that's the case, how hard is it to load them? Lifting a 150 pound robot 14" up in two seconds sure requires a lot of force.
Also, does the entire system pivot around that huge C-bracket?
Anyway, your robot sure looks great. It seems like we are using the same material on our ramps (does it, by any chance, weigh 1,5 kg per square meter? Incredibly strong stuff!
)
03-02-2007 23:17
Madison
|
Looks great, as well as the rest of the robot, but I have a few questions - not sure if I completely understood your system.
Are the gas shocks preloaded, and then released to lift (launch? ) another robot? If that's the case, how hard is it to load them? Lifting a 150 pound robot 14" up in two seconds sure requires a lot of force.Also, does the entire system pivot around that huge C-bracket? Anyway, your robot sure looks great. It seems like we are using the same material on our ramps (does it, by any chance, weigh 1,5 kg per square meter? Incredibly strong stuff! ) |
There'll be some pictures of our progress on the lifts uploaded sometime very soon.