|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Last year we crashed and burned.
Now, out of the ashes comes .... PHOENIX.
48"- 15 degree ramp, 18" bench, 48" bridge and 30" deck.
54" stationary post; 48" rotating arm
05-02-2007 19:00
Nate Laverdure
Looks very good. How wide are the wheel channels? What does the big red light do (EDIT: I guess I should read the manual again)?
05-02-2007 19:02
MarsBOtkidlooks great : ) my only concern is that your relieing that everyone has a simular wheel base. Looks excellent though keep up the good work
05-02-2007 19:45
Greg Marra
05-02-2007 20:07
Nuttyman54
nice work. do you have any concerns about driver's abilities to maneuver into the wheel wells?
05-02-2007 20:27
Dylan Gramlichidk those wheel spaces seem pretty big...and its gonna be right in front of your driver station. Good job keep it up!!
05-02-2007 20:28
karpironWe decided to go with 6"x2" channel centered on a standard kit frame wheel dimensions accepting the risk that it may not fit all comers.
As to the question of maneuvering into that track, I return that question to all of you. Think you could climb aboard?
05-02-2007 20:33
fimmelif the inside rail was shorter team 885's bot should be able to climb it (we have like .5" clearance 6wd chassis)
05-02-2007 20:35
Kyle Love
Some "low rider" teams may find it difficult to get on the ramp with a 2" lip on the sides.
05-02-2007 20:44
karpironWould a 1" inside flange height make a difference?
We'll recalulate structural integrity and consider modification.
05-02-2007 20:57
Kyle Love
I would say between .5 and 1 would be low enough. I don't know if there will be many low rider teams this year.
05-02-2007 21:05
MishraArtificerBear in mind (according to the rules), to score the points at the end, the robots have to be entirely inside the home zone. They'll have to do a sharp 90 degree turn to get onto your platform and get both of them there in less than 15 seconds...unless you plan to turn your bot with them on top of you?
05-02-2007 21:15
AustinSchuhI know for a fact that we have 1 7/8 inch of clearance.
05-02-2007 21:18
RedHeadRoboticsi think it looks good, but how do you plan to get inner tubes. It does look like a good idea for the ramps
05-02-2007 21:55
Eric Yahrmatter|
I would say between .5 and 1 would be low enough. I don't know if there will be many low rider teams this year.
|
05-02-2007 22:09
aksharlooks good and like it could support bots. but, if one of your alliance bot's is coming down the field in the last 5-10 seconds i dont think they will have enough time to be able to manuever onto the wheel channels?
05-02-2007 22:13
Gabe
Our robot would never be able to maneuver on that ramp, since the flanges are so high.
05-02-2007 22:21
GertlexIf a robot has bumpers at the front of it, keep in mind that it may still hit the base of your arm...
Otherwise, looks good 
05-02-2007 23:32
Heretic121
i think it would definatley be a LOT safter to go 1" inside even SAFER for .5" maybe put some lexan across the bottom all the way so you dont need the inside!?!
05-02-2007 23:36
s_forbes|
You may want to consider bending the inner flanges the other way (down) instead. This will give you nearly the same structural integrity and will allow virtually all teams with narrow aspect robots to climb on top of you.
|