|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Rookie team 2104's first robot. A tank design with 4" treads, pneumatic front-end lifter for easier turning. 8 drive train motors (4 Cim, 2 MiniBike, 2 FP). KOP chassis parts plus 1/4" aluminum plates.
08-02-2007 21:55
ZZII 527That is a NICE tank drive. Great job and welcome to FIRST!
I see you're from MA, but I didn't see you on the Boston Regional list. What regional are you attending and are you going to the Championship? I'd love to see this in person.
Edit: Found it on the web...next obvious choice was CT. Best of luck, it really looks great!
08-02-2007 22:00
Alex Cormier
wow, great looking tank! who's your belt maker? Also, is that the finished bot?
08-02-2007 22:05
GertlexDone any testing to see how durable the tread belt is? I'm particularly thinking when your robot is pushed sideways.
Looks pretty schweet!
08-02-2007 22:08
flightofoneHaven't really done much testing - we are hoping to be the "Pusher", not the "Pushee". The treads are Brecoflex 4"x80". "Finished" is a relative
term. At this point we still have to change sprockets to go faster, improve the chain tensioners, stuff in 4 more motors, mount the ramp, and lose 18 pounds
. It was nice to have it driving around the school for the first time today.
08-02-2007 22:12
Greg Marra
8 drive train motors?
This year we're going to see some serious pushing action going on with 100 pound robots and drivetrains as beastly as we've seen.
08-02-2007 22:22
Alex Cormier
|
8 drive train motors?
This year we're going to see some serious pushing action going on with 100 pound robots and drivetrains as beastly as we've seen. |
indeed, i love to see all diffrent ideas of drives, it's the best.
08-02-2007 22:32
Lil' Lavery
Why did you opt to put not only 8 motors, but the 8 most powerful motors available, into the drive-train? Yeah, everyone likes powerful drives, but that's next to ridiculous! Especially considering traction is often the bigger advantage than pure power in many pushing matches.
Are you going to have any scoring mechanisms or robot raising mechanisms?
08-02-2007 23:11
Kevin Kolodziej
Nice job guys. One question though - how much of that tread is actually in contact with the carpet?? Do you have an offset center so that only half the track or less is in contact with the carpet at any given time? With 4" treads, be wary of friction while turning. A few years ago, 1064 went with 3" belts and wanted to do 4 tracks that could pivot and "stand up" so it could turn. Didn't work so well though...but I hope you guys have much success.
08-02-2007 23:47
Mullen|
Nice job guys. One question though - how much of that tread is actually in contact with the carpet?? Do you have an offset center so that only half the track or less is in contact with the carpet at any given time? With 4" treads, be wary of friction while turning. A few years ago, 1064 went with 3" belts and wanted to do 4 tracks that could pivot and "stand up" so it could turn. Didn't work so well though...but I hope you guys have much success.
|
09-02-2007 00:25
AdamHeard
Tanks are impressive from any team.
8 drive motors are impressive for any team.
For a rookie team... that is simply amazing. What regionals are you going to?
09-02-2007 09:20
CowmankozaMy goodness, 4" belts and an 8 motor drivetrain, you guys obviously wanna make a statement in your rookie year. That is very very impressive for a rookie team, excellent job guys
09-02-2007 12:49
flightofone
09-02-2007 13:17
Travis Hoffman
|
Why did you opt to put not only 8 motors, but the 8 most powerful motors available, into the drive-train? Yeah, everyone likes powerful drives, but that's next to ridiculous! Especially considering traction is often the bigger advantage than pure power in many pushing matches.
Are you going to have any scoring mechanisms or robot raising mechanisms? |
10-02-2007 15:29
1768Sad to see that beast won't be in Boston like us. Isn't there a rule against using >4 CIMs, though? I will watch the online coverage of CT just to see thisbeast smash some heads.
I wasn't expecting defense to be a good strategy this year, but if there are beasts like this thing out there I may have to re-evaluate that assumption.
10-02-2007 15:43
Rick-906what a monster
im pretty sure that could eat our robots omni-drive for breakfast
10-02-2007 15:51
Cerpin_Taxttank controls seem to take too much time to turn when in compition, but your set-up seems to work...
10-02-2007 16:42
MishraArtificer
10-02-2007 17:05
flightofoneWe've got some panels that deploy, with a 10-degree ramp to allow 2 robots on top of us. Haven't quite gotten them deploying reliably yet, the first attempt with springs kind of tore itself apart. There is a lexan window over the controller, and the rest of the ramp structure is aluminum honeycomb.
13-02-2007 21:01
Cerpin_Taxtwere still working on our ramp right now... we are behind by at least a week.
13-02-2007 23:39
Lil' Lavery
|
Sad to see that beast won't be in Boston like us. Isn't there a rule against using >4 CIMs, though? I will watch the online coverage of CT just to see thisbeast smash some heads.
I wasn't expecting defense to be a good strategy this year, but if there are beasts like this thing out there I may have to re-evaluate that assumption. |
16-02-2007 20:03
FIRSTMa2104yes we never said 8 CIM, but the motors is not our top priority right now, a lot to get done, and since overweight(the beast is very heavy) we are thinking of not putting any more motors. But we ll see if we have any pounds we ll put more motors in.
16-02-2007 20:10
thewhitOh my goodness I am such a noobie. I cant figure out how to create a whole new thread or blog. I would like to start a new topic...can someone help me (the loser who cant post) out. haha
17-02-2007 16:12
Dan Zollman|
I cant figure out how to create a whole new thread or blog. I would like to start a new topic...
|