30-04-2007 08:53

65_Xero_Huskie

Re: pic: Teams 330,910,1270 vs 71,179,233

This looks like a render.
I like it

30-04-2007 09:01

Qbranch

Re: pic: Teams 330,910,1270 vs 71,179,233

At first, I thought you meant BIG team number vs BIG team number (example 71,179,233 aka 71million 179thousand 233)

-q

30-04-2007 09:03

whytheheckme

Re: pic: Teams 330,910,1270 vs 71,179,233

LOL!

I had to read that twice to get it... but that would be hilarious! We could only wish there were that many teams.

We are a rookie team, 1991, and I've always wondered when that number would seem like a low number. Like a number 365 seems low to me now, but I'm sure at one time it seemed like a large number.

Jacob

30-04-2007 10:53

Jeremiah Johnson

Re: pic: Teams 330,910,1270 vs 71,179,233

We USED to be a low number, now we're a middle number, soon to be a low number again.

Team 648 was once 309... that was 1999 and 2000... much fun. At least we dropped the name from that year (Fab Five).

30-04-2007 23:15

Caio

Re: pic: Teams 330,910,1270 vs 71,179,233

its pictures like these that make me wish we had little hot-wheels-like models of FIRST robots that people could buy and like paint different colors then simlulate a match with... haha

robots like that look cute when they're that small (thats right, i said cute)

30-04-2007 23:36

=Martin=Taylor=

Re: pic: Teams 330,910,1270 vs 71,179,233

You mean FIRSThammer ?