|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Christmas came early to the Beachbots. Fedex delivered the 2008 FRC Game Hint 3 days early.
It came with a note to visit http://www.usfirst.org/frc_decgift but that isn't even active yet.
15-12-2007 17:38
geeknerd99Looks pretty legit to me.... read the board carefully...
More digging later
Edit: Can you show us the other end of the cable?
15-12-2007 17:39
EricH
The site says something about insert text and pdf here. (You have to enter the URL directly; no link yet.)
Joe, if there wasn't photographic evidence, I'd suspect something was up on your end...Seeing as there is, Lavery Claus has struck.
Reading what is below the five LEDs, each says something about "CHXX", with XX reading (L-R) 03, 02, 01, 00. Except for the far right one, which reads "ERROR". Then you throw in what looks like a reset button. I detect a radio device of some form.
Oh, and there is a website printed on the board. www.divsys.com
15-12-2007 17:45
EricH
15-12-2007 17:49
geeknerd99Ahhh, let us now experience the powers of the interwebs.
15-12-2007 17:55
Billfred
I call shenanigans (and not just because of Joe's history). Anybody can put a circuit board together with "© 2007 FIRST" silkscreened on it. (I also find it a little strange that FIRST would spend what can only be an appreciable sum on FedExing 1,500 of these things around the world when the kits are also going out reasonably soon.)
That said, I'm lightly seasoning my words in case I need to eat them later.
15-12-2007 17:58
clydefrog88
I don't think its a hoax. Check out the provided web address, it works.
15-12-2007 18:00
Billfred
The URL does work, and it points to a known supplier of FIRST (see their logo on the banner here). I'm still cautious.
15-12-2007 18:01
SU 39It definitely is real. Our mentor just got the package himself today via FedEx Saturday delivery. The picture our mentor took shows the same parts that are displayed here. Can't seem to figure anything out yet though.
15-12-2007 18:02
Tottanka
I was gonna think that it all is a part of the new KOP, as the cable has where to connect on this board.
Only problem is it says FIRST2007. If it said FIRST2008, i'd be sure its from the KOP.
What could it be used for, can anyone who knows electronics look at it and tell what he thinks?
15-12-2007 18:02
clydefrog88
Oh, I meant the FIRST address. There's no information posted, but the URL navigates to a valid portion of the usfirst.org site. Anyway, there goes my sleep for the rest of the year...
15-12-2007 18:05
Doug G
15-12-2007 18:05
RyanNI also don't think it's a hoax. Here is what I can see from the picture:
15-12-2007 18:07
bear24rw|
I also don't think it's a hoax. Here is what I can see from the picture:
|
15-12-2007 18:09
technoLThere goes Christmas...
I'm still a little skeptical. Are we sure that this is a hint and not an early delivery of an item in the kit? Perhaps something extra for teams that has nothing to do with the game, like the fuel cell challenge was?
15-12-2007 18:10
Doug GThe board also has a website listed on it...
DSI
www.divsys.com
but it's just a rapid prototyping company that does circuit boards.
15-12-2007 18:10
Joe Ross
|
There goes Christmas...
I'm still a little skeptical. Are we sure that this is a hint and not an early delivery of an item in the kit? Perhaps something extra for teams that has nothing to do with the game, like the fuel cell challenge was? |
15-12-2007 18:12
Billfred
|
Good guess.. i wasn't in FIRST for 2004 game but i heard that they used IR and it wasnt very reliable.. is this true?
|
15-12-2007 18:12
Tottanka
i can see there the number 67 on the right top of the board.
Also some sort of a black signature on the left top of it.
I think we need to see more pictures of boards, there might be a few versions of them.
What's on the other side of the board/ paper?
Why isn't there an email blast about this yet? Last year there was one.
15-12-2007 18:17
Scott L.Specs on the PIC microchip on the circuit board
http://www.chipcatalog.com/Microchip/PIC16LF87-I-P.htm
This powerful (200 nanosecond instruction execution) yet easy-to-program (only 35 single word instructions) CMOS Flash-based 8-bit microcontroller packs Microchip’s powerful PIC® architecture into an 18-pin package and is upwards compatible with the PIC16C7x, PIC16C62xA, PIC16C5X and PIC12CXXX devices. The PIC16F87 features 8MHz internal oscillator, 256 bytes of EEPROM data memory, a capture/compare/PWM, an Addressable USART and 2 Comparators that make it ideal for advantage analog / integrated level applications in automotive, industrial, appliances and consumer applications.
15-12-2007 18:18
Libby K
GAAAAAAH! No, not now! The hint can't come out until AFTER I'm on winter break! I still have schoolwork to do! NO!
15-12-2007 18:20
bear24rwDo you think the white header is an in circuit programmer or something?
15-12-2007 18:20
Joe Ross
|
Also some sort of a black signature on the left top of it.
I think we need to see more pictures of boards, there might be a few versions of them. What's on the other side of the board/ paper? |
15-12-2007 18:26
Leav
<playing_along>That black thing on the top right of the board looks like an IR emitter (transceiver?) to me... could be a way to program the RC remotely....</playing_along>
in any case I'm gonna still go with the "thanks for keeping us occupied while there is no game hint - but this is probably not real" line of thought... just to keep myself sane.... 
-Leav
15-12-2007 18:29
fimmel|
in any case I'm gonna still go with the "thanks for keeping us occupied while there is no game hint - but this is probably not real" line of thought... ![]() -Leav |
of guessing lol
15-12-2007 18:33
BongleUgh... I always dislike these threads because past hints have always been so far from what the game ended being, or being hoaxes. It is so easy to think of theories that are fully justified but end up being completely off the mark.
But... I have my own theory:
The colors of the cable remind me of Dave's pre-finals speech at the 06 championship where he made like the vision targets were going to change colours from green->red->blue throughout the einstein matches. The various CMD[0..3] LCDs could indicate the current colour that it is driving. Since there appears to be nothing that appears to connect to the RC, I'd say this is a field element control piece. The IR receiver looks exactly like the ones we had on 2004, so perhaps we have to beam IR at a field element.
It will probably lie flat somewhere low (1-3 ft off the ground). I get this because the IR receiver points upwards at a slight angle if you lie it flat, which would allow it to receive IR from a robot-mounted source. I'm guessing it isn't upside down because it would have to be so high that you wouldn't easily be able to see what mode it is in.
Here's a complete theory, good and precise so I'll look kinda dumb when the truth comes out:
-Teams all received this piece early so that they can begin constructing the field element for their practice field, details of which will be put up on the frc_decgift site soon. The field element will respond to IR emissions to cycle through modes (possibly colour related, judging by the rainbow cable), which will be indicated on the front to judges or teams via the LEDs. These modes will change some form of action on the field, which will be revealed at the kickoff.
15-12-2007 18:35
JaneYoung
Oh dear, Libby, you still have to study, no 2 ways about it.
FedEx, thank you! (I think
)
15-12-2007 18:38
Libby K
...but....but...Jaaaaaaaaane! I won't be able to concentrate!
15-12-2007 18:38
vivek16Gaa!!
Why couldn't it be a riddle like before sometimes?
Ill wait until our team gets one.
-vivek
15-12-2007 18:41
AndyB
15-12-2007 18:41
BuddyB309I think this year we can use monkeys, as long as they are somehow powered by the battery.
15-12-2007 18:42
Leav
I'm sorry but there is just one thing keeping me sane at the moment:
there is no way this should be shipped outside the KOP. period.
well except of course as a game hint... but that is very costly compared to a simple post here at CD by lavery - so I deem it unlikely to be sent out early solely as a hint piece.
it is so costly to ship this out to all the teams, for a hint that's not really supposed to help you find out what the game is.
now that we have concluded it cannot be a hint (i hope
) we can also tackle other scnerios:
1)it is a field piece they added at the last minute: unlikely because they plan the game very well and wouldnt just forget something or add something in the last minute.
2)it is a piece for the robot they just developed: well there is still time to send it out to the various kickoff locations and distribute it in a very orderly way and make sure everyone gets one instead of just sending it off to every single mentor....
so sorry, but I can't rationalize this being what you say it is Joe 
-Leav
15-12-2007 18:42
Tottanka
15-12-2007 18:45
AndyB
15-12-2007 18:46
Libby K
It's not. Promise.
Note the "jk LOL" in the edit. Also, he's waaaaaaaay too busy for CD. Unlike me...
15-12-2007 18:46
Leav
(it's 1:46 am in Israel now)
15-12-2007 18:47
johnrdid it come in a box? game piece?
what was packing material?
any printing on inside of shpping box?
15-12-2007 18:50
JaneYoung
|
also.... Liron it is really late what are you doing up!
(it's 1:46 am in Israel now)-Leav |
Why - are - you guys up?!
15-12-2007 18:53
Libby K
I have a feeling Dave is just sitting at his computer going....
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH!!!!!
15-12-2007 18:53
vivek16you say IR sensors, I say gerbil sensors....
Could someone please enlighten me as to what the IR part of the 04 game was? It was stack attack that year right?
thank, vivek
15-12-2007 18:54
Leav
|
He was waiting for a game hint it seems.
Why - are - you guys up?! |
you will have to try harder (look at the full URL..)
15-12-2007 18:55
AndyB
04 was Raising the Bar. No Clue what IR was used for.
I didn't upload it myself. Here you go: http://www.usfirst.org/community/frc...t.aspx?id=7600
15-12-2007 18:56
Tottanka
|
He was waiting for a game hint it seems.
Why - are - you guys up?! |
15-12-2007 18:59
bear24rwokay... so now we can control our robots with a tv remote lol
15-12-2007 19:02
AndyB
So now we know what it is..... what is the purpose?
Laser tag robotics?
15-12-2007 19:03
Ian Curtis
15-12-2007 19:04
Leav
well I have to go to sleep now... I really do...
but I will sleep soundly - because I have confidence that when I wake up this case will be cracked wide open and you guys will have the solution to this vexing (pun most definitely intended) riddle
-Leav
15-12-2007 19:05
Tottanka
|
So now we know what it is..... what is the purpose?
Laser tag robotics? |
15-12-2007 19:05
ADZDEBLICKAt the end it says "Assuming a 12VDC supply, the power consumption of an idle FIRST IR board is appoximately 78mW." so could we assume that this will be going on the robot?
15-12-2007 19:06
AndyB
Sounds like there could either be more robot interaction this year, or possibly a field that changes during the game.
15-12-2007 19:06
Tottanka
|
At the end it says "Assuming a 12VDC supply, the power consumption of an idle FIRST IR board is appoximately 78mW." so could we assume that this will be going on the robot?
|
15-12-2007 19:08
Synergy1848|
you say IR sensors, I say gerbil sensors....
Could someone please enlighten me as to what the IR part of the 04 game was? It was stack attack that year right? thank, vivek |
15-12-2007 19:10
AndyB
|
I don't think so. Going off Bongle's earlier post referencing Dave Verbrugge's joke from 2006, perhaps this will allow teams to replicate some field condition. I.E the field will change the color of the lights randomly every X seconds. This will allow teams to replicate this at home.
|
15-12-2007 19:12
Stu Bloom
|
I'm sorry but there is just one thing keeping me sane at the moment:
there is no way this should be shipped outside the KOP. period. well except of course as a game hint... but that is very costly compared to a simple post here at CD by lavery - so I deem it unlikely to be sent out early solely as a hint piece. it is so costly to ship this out to all the teams, for a hint that's not really supposed to help you find out what the game is. now that we have concluded it cannot be a hint (i hope ) we can also tackle other scnerios:1)it is a field piece they added at the last minute: unlikely because they plan the game very well and wouldnt just forget something or add something in the last minute. 2)it is a piece for the robot they just developed: well there is still time to send it out to the various kickoff locations and distribute it in a very orderly way and make sure everyone gets one instead of just sending it off to every single mentor.... so sorry, but I can't rationalize this being what you say it is Joe ![]() -Leav |
|
From: FRC Teams [mailto:frcteams@usfirst.org] Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:08 PM To: undisclosed-recipients: Subject: **FIRST EMAIL**/FRC Game Hint Season's Greetings 2008 FRC Teams: ...game hint season of course... Make sure your shipping contact, as recorded in TIMS, is diligent about checking the mail for your team. Keep an eye out for a December gift from FRC and the Game Design Committee! Good luck, and GO TEAMS! -- FIRST Robotics Competition (p) 1-800-871-8326 x 0 (f) 603-666-3907 frcteams@usfirst.org www.usfirst.org |
15-12-2007 19:15
fimmelwell the pdf was created friday december 14th 2007 at 3:39:46 pm by adobe distiller....nothing spectacular...the author though is kpilotte after a quick google search it turns out theres a photobucket account with that username http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v641/kpilotte/ and a stumbleupn account http://kpilotte.stumbleupon.com/ an ilounge account http://forums.ilounge.com/showthread.php?t=57728 and something promising is she had an @usfirst.org email address... http://www.sensorsmag.com/sensors/Se.../detail/314079 under more sensors please. from what i gather she is part of FIRST's sensor development team.
kinda crazy lol
may be useful idk
15-12-2007 19:21
Dan PetrovicI'd imagine it's a field element that they need shipped out so remote Kickoffs can have an accurate field set up on Kickoff day. They release material lists for field elements before Kickoff for that purpose.
I guess we will be seeing some changing field elements this year.
Only 20 days left....
15-12-2007 19:23
Ryan Foley
|
from what i gather she is part of FIRST's sensor development team.
|
15-12-2007 19:31
Gamer930
|
I'd imagine it's a field element that they need shipped out so remote Kickoffs can have an accurate field set up on Kickoff day.
|
15-12-2007 19:33
dlavery
|
I have a feeling Dave is just sitting at his computer going....
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH!!!!! |
15-12-2007 19:40
psyco_klownmaybe we use Wii remotes cuz last year xbox360 controllers
15-12-2007 19:42
AndyB
Infared transmitters around the field sending info to the robot maybe?
Maybe its the gamepiece hahah... that would catch us all off guard...
15-12-2007 19:48
ebarker|
Kate Pilotte was a member of the 2007 GDC, and I would imagine she is back for 2008 as well.
Cool article, nice find. |
15-12-2007 19:50
Andy Baker
Diversified Systems out of Indianapolis made the sensor boards (and populated the components onto the boards) for last year's Kit of Parts. The same guys who managed the build for those boards were judges at the Boilermaker Regional, the FRC Championships, and IRI.
It's great to see Diversified get more involved with FRC.
Andy B.
15-12-2007 20:07
psyco_klownLook what i found on the Trossen Robotic's website http://www.trossenrobotics.com/store...-Remote.aspx:D
15-12-2007 20:09
galewind
|
Good guess.. i wasn't in FIRST for 2004 game but i heard that they used IR and it wasnt very reliable.. is this true?
|
15-12-2007 20:11
|
Look what i found on the Trossen Robotic's website http://www.trossenrobotics.com/store...-Remote.aspx:D
|
15-12-2007 20:13
bear24rw|
It's showing an error.
See, FIRST must have a thing with killing our sleep... Because my brain is a bit too busy with speculation and designs to sleep now. |
15-12-2007 20:14
Kaushal.KIf the IR-sensors are gonna b used for some sort of robot "ID" system (2 tell apart frend from foe) if the game was something like lazer tag (as suggested above) and to score/dock points based on who you hit..
just thinkin aloud here..
15-12-2007 20:23
Kevin Sevcik
I just hope FIRST is smart enough to stay away from actual TV IR codes if this is a field element. And/or that teams will stick with odd buttons on DVD remotes. Given the existence of the Ninja Remote and the TV-B-Gone and all.
Mostly I'm worried about the impact of field lighting on these. I've seen some remotes that were remarkably finicky about fluorescent lighting near the receivers and all.
15-12-2007 20:28
fimmel|
I just hope FIRST is smart enough to stay away from actual TV IR codes if this is a field element. And/or that teams will stick with odd buttons on DVD remotes. Given the existence of the Ninja Remote and the TV-B-Gone and all.
Mostly I'm worried about the impact of field lighting on these. I've seen some remotes that were remarkably finicky about fluorescent lighting near the receivers and all. |
15-12-2007 20:29
Andrew Schuetze|
It's showing an error.
See, FIRST must have a thing with killing our sleep... Because my brain is a bit too busy with speculation and designs to sleep now. |
15-12-2007 20:29
BongleConsidering:
Once its mode is set, a single 5V output is sent via its output pins. The RC has 5V inputs.
It accepts power in voltages in a range that includes the voltage that the robot runs at.
It would be difficult for teams to wire up a IR emitter that emits certain codes, but it would be easy(-er) for them to mount this on the robot and receive codes from more complicated hardware mounted on the field.
Dave's joke in Atlanta in 2006 before the Einstein matches.
Changing my earlier guess:
I now guess that this will be robot mounted, and will receive info about field status from a high-mounted (hence the angle upwards on the IR sensor) source, akin to the green light in 2006 and 2007. Since it has 4 modes, then we can assume the field will have some item (probably in autonomous mode) that can be in a state that is in exactly one of up to four states. Each competition will probably have a 'training unit' where you can take your robot to get its IR sensor trained to recognize the 4 IR codes for the field modes, similar to how you could get calibration RGB data for the camera.
| the field lights are not florescent |
15-12-2007 20:46
Nuttyman54
The first thing I think of when I see this is all the fun I had making Mindstorms RCXs talk to eachother.....
15-12-2007 20:46
cicib99|
I have a feeling Dave is just sitting at his computer going....
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH!!!!! |
15-12-2007 20:47
Qbranch
So here's what I'm thinking:
CMOS image sensors pick up into the infrared spectrum REALLY WELL. So, anything that ouputs any infrared will appear rediculously bright white on a monochrome or color CMOS image sensor. I think it might even work for CCD devices. Just try pointing your favoirite handy-dandy camera/camcorder at a television remote and push a button.
So... that gets you to a target... then when you're in front of it the decoder can tell you what it is. Sounds like a great extended autonomous to me.
Wow I can hardly wait now!
-q
15-12-2007 20:47
Tom BottiglieriI would love to see robots talking to each other this season, but it's probably safer to assume these things will be getting signals from the field.
Can't wait to get my hands on one.
15-12-2007 20:52
Joe Ross
|
did it come in a box? game piece?
what was packing material? any printing on inside of shpping box? |
15-12-2007 21:09
BanksKid|
I don't think so. Going off Bongle's earlier post referencing Dave Verbrugge's joke from 2006, perhaps this will allow teams to replicate some field condition. I.E the field will change the color of the lights randomly every X seconds. This will allow teams to replicate this at home.
|
15-12-2007 21:13
hipsterjrdoes this mean I can stop staring at the "Woodies's game hint @ Atlanta " thread? There has been almost 30 post per hour on here
This is defiantly legit, but the question is now where do we go from here?
15-12-2007 21:13
edthegeekMy musings on this.
A series of IR "keys" would be given to each team. 4 keys, one per LED. The keys are unique to each team.
The interaction with the field would go as follows. There are four stations that contain whatever game piece we will be playing with this year.We use our four keys to unlock one of these stations, one per station. The stations then release the game pieces and a set number of points are awarded to a team for unlocking a station.
This also releases game elements that can be used by either alliance to score (makes alliances balance threats and opportunities). The alternate strategy is totally shutting out the other alliance from reaching a station, thus preventing them from scoring anything, and then unlocking a station yourself.
This uses the relatively short distance of IR to its advantage. It forces teams to actually get close to the station instead of trying to unlock a station from long distance.
15-12-2007 21:27
Nuttyman54
I get it! It's how they're solving the radio issues. We're driving the robots with TV remotes. You know...enter 32 into the channel changer to drive forward...Just imagine:
"32-98-101-13-7-20-57-32! No, 64! Volume up! VOLUME UP!"
-The previous has been posted for Methane of Team 190
15-12-2007 21:40
JaneYoung
15-12-2007 21:43
synth3tk
I don't have a detailed whatever made up, but maybe based off of Capture-The-Flag? I don't know. I'm just all fizzled up inside now!
15-12-2007 21:48
BanksKid
15-12-2007 21:49
BornaEMaybe we have to build a small autonomous robot that can be signaled with 4 commands.
The next 3 weeks are gonna be bad
15-12-2007 22:03
Blue_MistAll of these ideas are great and funny, but our team hasn't gotten ours or I would definitely know about it. We reside very firmly in California. Also, I can't get to it from the page "FIRST Robotics Competition Documents and Updates," the page it claims to come from. Sorry, I don't trust this hint to be true. 
15-12-2007 22:06
vivek16well, there was an email from FIRST, the link is on the first website, and a photo of it with FIRST on it...
Believe what you want but I think that this is the hint.
jm2c, vivek
EDIT: FIRST doesn't have to link it from their webpage. The url doesn't have to be provided on the page "FIRST Robotics Competition Documents and Updates," for it to be under it...
15-12-2007 22:18
alex1699well IR stuff hmmm.. thats crazy stuff the field is going to be sending are robots to do stuff i think..
15-12-2007 22:21
synth3tk
|
well IR stuff hmmm.. thats crazy stuff the field is going to be sending are robots to do stuff i think..
|
15-12-2007 22:27
JBotAlan
I'm making two assumptions here, and with the logic to back them up, here they are:
-This isn't going on the robot. The speak of powering it from a bench supply or AA batteries proves that.
-The robots will not be emitting IR. Think of the mess debugging that would be. The judges would all have to have cameras fixed on each robot to make sure nobody was jamming the signal for everyone.
My guess:
I'm going for some kind of human player controllable field item. The HP gets a remote, points it at the field item and presses a button. The goal may change colors, but that's about all. It won't move, as that would be terrible for teams to construct, and awful to maintain during a match. I think it has to do with a vision target, as most teams have not figured out tracking yet, and FIRST wants us to.
Hmmm...I don't know...
Whatever it is, it looks fun!
JBot (counting down the days...)
P.S. I would like to think that this device will be mounted on the robot...it would be amazing to get signals from the field. Period switches, or different goals...hmm...I may end up being totally wrong all around. Whatev, but my sleep is totally gone now.
15-12-2007 22:31
Kyle Love
I am finally, first time in 5 years now, not going to worry about the game hint.....and try to be uber suprised at kickoff when the game is announced...I'll just play Halo or something. As I have said many times before, yet again, Dave is out to mess with our heads, now by saying MWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
15-12-2007 22:31
Michelle Celio
So I'm imputing a crazy idea I came up with in an AIM Chat...
|
michellecelio (10:23:49 PM): On the field could be random IR walls, sort of like on the roomba's virtual wall, that will randomly be turned on and off . michellecelio (10:23:55 PM): With this, would be another IR thing on the robot so the robot would randomly not be able to go any further. |
15-12-2007 22:34
IndySam
|
I am finally, first time in 5 years now, not going to worry about the game hint.....and try to be uber suprised at kickoff when the game is announced...I'll just play Halo or something. As I have said many times before, yet again, Dave is out to mess with our heads, now by saying MWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
|
15-12-2007 22:34
PhilBot
Since the outputs on the cable are digital, it would make sense for it to be plugged into the RC's digital input header, but the pinout isn't compatible. No easy way to connect it directly, or with PWM cables....
As much as I'd love to see this on the robot.... they've made it hard to wire in.
It's also interesting that the unit has to be set up to "Learn" the codes that it's meant to respond to.... Do they really trust all the teams to "teach" their board the correct codes ???? Sure ... that'll happen.
BTW, if you think the IR controller is fun... what about the IR ball ?
http://www.hitechnic.com/ click on products and scroll down to IRB1004
15-12-2007 22:37
Akash RastogiA lot of these posts are still talking specifically about the board itself. Note that past hints have almost never been about what the objects were or what was on the game hint. So, unless by some weird account Im completely wrong, the game will have nothing to do what's on the board.
Any others receive their boards?
15-12-2007 22:37
PhilBot
|
I'm making two assumptions here, and with the logic to back them up, here they are:
-This isn't going on the robot. The speak of powering it from a bench supply or AA batteries proves that. |
15-12-2007 22:40
JBotAlan
|
BTW, if you think the IR controller is fun... what about the IR ball ?
http://www.hitechnic.com/ click on products and scroll down to IRB1004 |
). It's just, these are so breakable and the batteries...I'm glad I'm not a volunteer.
15-12-2007 22:43
JBotAlan
|
Except that the +V on the RC PWM outputs is 7.2 volts which is in the specified range. (Just like the CMU cam)
|
15-12-2007 22:56
Akash RastogiRibbon cable-cable tv-tv antenna-antenna-tower
something to do with a tower in the middle of the field?
Notice how the 07 game had something to do with the '97 game pieces-tubes
Anyone think something similar could happen with the '98 game this year?
15-12-2007 23:02
alex1699i think this is a little obgect that has nothing to do with any thing buit the number 5 that after 2 minute of staring at it
15-12-2007 23:02
EricH
I'm going to say this.
1. It probably isn't in the kit because A) FIRST got stuck on a game hint or B) it arrived too late, and FIRST decided to just send them out.
2. In 2004, the IR beacons, which looked something like this, were part of the field. This probably is not going on a robot.
3. I hope a riddle is released soon.
15-12-2007 23:10
JaneYoung
FedEx has been a generous sponsor for FIRST. The shipping of these packages likely means that FedEx has been generous again. That's a lot of generosity for the game clue. To post a riddle would not be as costly or involve a sponsor(s) (FedEx, Diversified Systems, etc.) like this effort has done.
15-12-2007 23:24
DanDon
|
Correct, but why would they suggest a benchtop power supply? I still think this is a field element. I'm sure I could be wrong, but FIRST would be giving us instructions on how to tap into that power source. There are teams that have no idea where to get power from without instructions. Remember how the CMUcam came with documentation stating exactly how to connect it? Those docs would have to exist for this thing. And maybe they do. Maybe I'm wrong. But I don't think so.
JBot (I need to stop posting...) PS. I was going to combine my two posts, but cannot figure out how to delete this one. Is that functionality missing now? BRANDON!!! ;-) |
.
15-12-2007 23:30
BornaE|
The CMUcam2 also came with instructions on how to set it up with a bench setup...just something to keep in mind
. |
15-12-2007 23:37
Grant Cox
This thread has grown 5 pages since I last looked at it, so I didn't read the whole thing..
But I think this provides a possibility of a concept I've been interested in for a while - interactive autonomous. Robots sending messages to each other of positions, or actions, or whatever it may be.
I really like some of the other ideas people have thrown out though; interactive HP field element, "invisible" walls, etc.
15-12-2007 23:40
Elgin Clock
|
well the pdf was created friday december 14th 2007 at 3:39:46 pm by adobe distiller....nothing spectacular...the author though is kpilotte after a quick google search...
. something promising is she had an @usfirst.org email address... http://www.sensorsmag.com/sensors/Se.../detail/314079 under more sensors please. from what i gather she is part of FIRST's sensor development team. |
|
Kate Pilotte was a member of the 2007 GDC, and I would imagine she is back for 2008 as well.
Cool article, nice find. |
|
So I'm imputing a crazy idea I came up with in an AIM Chat...
|
)
15-12-2007 23:41
Kevin Sevcik
Okay, so I'll toss in my speculation. I think this is in fact going on the robot. I don't think they'd send it out for teams to play around with just to put it on the field. Sending out a field element like this makes no sense, first, teams wouldn't need it to play with. A field item would be VERY specifically wired, configured, and used. You didn't need to play with the cold cathodes for the light target, you just wired them up like FIRST said. On the other hand, sending out the CMUCams early would've been highly useful. Second, putting a receiver like this on the field then assumes that teams are going to have some sort of transmitter on their robot. Which they don't have to play with and figure out.
Also, I am firmly convinced that FIRST is not so fiscally irresponsible as to design, burn, and build 1500 of these and then express them to teams around the world for the sake of a red herring and to give Dave a chance to sit at his computer going "MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH!!!!!"
So, I am left to conclude that this goes on the robot to tell the state of something on the field in autonomous mode. I honestly have no idea what this might be, but consider ho interesting AIM high would have been if there were four square goals to hit with a target light in the middle. But a random goal was actually worth double points and you could only tell by using the IR receiver. So yeah, I don't know exactly what's going on in the demented minds of our GDC, but I'm sure they could come up with a way to make this useful to put on the robot.
15-12-2007 23:44
Nuttyman54
|
But I think this provides a possibility of a concept I've been interested in for a while - interactive autonomous. Robots sending messages to each other of positions, or actions, or whatever it may be.
|
15-12-2007 23:57
BinomeAnyone dumped the firmware yet, maybe the manual decryption key is hidden in the hex.
If this ends up being just a cool toy to play with, I can imagine it making a good coprocessor board for FRC teams to get their hands on, without going to the trouble of developing their own.
15-12-2007 23:58
JPonzoOK, This board is too long to go look for qutes, so I'll just give what i'm thinking lol...
I think (credit to the 1/2 of you that have suggested this already goes here) that this may be a component to go on the robot that corresponds to something sending an IR signal on the field. Assuming that, though, I think that this piece will have its main function in autonomous mode.
As with the camera in previous years and the IR back in '04, various technologies have been thrown in for teams to play around with, but have only served as critical to the autonomous period. I think FIRST will follow this trend because, for some teams with few members, it is not always possible to devote the time and resources required to program these things.
16-12-2007 00:37
FrenchieWhat about a remote during autonomous that allows you to adapt auto to whatever is happening? Would make it slightly more interesting...
16-12-2007 00:43
JYangbut then that's not exactly autonomous anymore... now if the robot had to figure out and adapt to whatever is happening... i think that'd be much more interesting
16-12-2007 00:49
Elgin Clock
OK, so since I was bored, and looking at the pic of the board for quite some time.. I decided to google some random things and see what I can find.
The order of the D codes above the LED's is D2, D5, D4, D3 & then D1.
The number 25431 is the zip code for the town of none other than Levels, West Virgina.
Different levels of game play?
Different levels of the field like a lot of previous years?
Acting like a level & balancing our robots again ala' 2001?
Who knows? I just found it really random & most intriguing within this current brainstorming session we have going on here.

Also, on a more serious kind of note I guess, it seems to me that the included ribbon cable would be attached to the large black block at the bottom right hand of the board.
If we have that for putting code in or out of the board, then we need something to do the opposite as well right?
Can you fit 2 pwm cables side by side on the white block above the LED cluster?
Just a thought. idk.. I'm not electrically inclined in the least when it comes to this stuff, but spatially speaking, it seems like 2 pwm cables would fit there.
16-12-2007 01:01
synth3tk
Levels, WV. Wow, you were bored, weren't you? You think it'd go that deep as to reference a zip code?
And to those who say FIRST wouldn't waste money on a game hint. No offense, but who cares? We're having fun coming up with ideas and designs to keep us occupied until the game is announced. And who knows, maybe our brainstorming will inspire the GDC for future games!
16-12-2007 01:04
EricH
I'm remembering 2004 and 2005. The biggest complaint about these new sensors (IR and CMUCamII, respectively) was, "We don't have enough time!" So the auto modes were disappointing in terms of sensor use. The camera situation was fixed (sort of) in 2006 and 2007 by giving a little bit of warning in the hints. Now, they give us a programmable IR sensor as the game hint. Start playing with these now if you want an an auto mode advantage.
16-12-2007 01:05
JaneYoung
|
And to those who say FIRST wouldn't waste money on a game hint. No offense, but who cares?
|
16-12-2007 01:10
s_forbesWell, obviously there are going to be four different game pieces: boxes, balls, tetrahedrons, and some of these. They are each placed into four starting zones randomly after the teams place their robots. In order to know what piece your dealing with in auto mode, you have to read the signal transmitted by each piece's starting zone. After you pick them up, you have to stick them in a gigantic cube in the center of the field that has holes in the shape of each game piece (you know, like that toy you had when you were a kid...)
It's so obvious. 
16-12-2007 01:14
Nica F.
16-12-2007 01:16
JPonzo|
Well, obviously there are going to be four different game pieces: boxes, balls, tetrahedrons, and some of these. They are each placed into four starting zones randomly after the teams place their robots. In order to know what piece your dealing with in auto mode, you have to read the signal transmitted by each piece's starting zone. After you pick them up, you have to stick them in a gigantic cube in the center of the field that has holes in the shape of each game piece (you know, like that toy you had when you were a kid...)
It's so obvious. ![]() |
16-12-2007 01:19
synth3tk
|
The GDC pays attention to every aspect of FIRST and all of the constraints involved, including budget. Nothing is wasted. On any level.
|
|
LOL.... and yet.... it could be......
my head hurts.... I'm done for the night lol..... |
16-12-2007 01:23
Arefin Bari
|
Also, I JUST recieved this FIRST email blast ...
NO QUESTION THIS IS A LEGITIMATE GAME HINT!! |
16-12-2007 01:26
fimmelmy mom (2nd TIMS contact) got the email....no package AFAIK yet
16-12-2007 01:26
JaneYoung
|
Stu, neither I nor the other contact on team 1345 received this email or received a package. The same goes for team 108 (as of right now). Are there anybody else who received this same email as Stu?
|
16-12-2007 01:29
Nuttyman54
|
Stu, neither I nor the other contact on team 1345 received this email or received a package. The same goes for team 108 (as of right now). Are there anybody else who received this same email as Stu?
|
16-12-2007 01:32
dlavery
|
Stu, neither I nor the other contact on team 1345 received this email or received a package. The same goes for team 108 (as of right now). Are there anybody else who received this same email as Stu?
|
16-12-2007 01:32
Pavan Dave
Joe...I love your work. As a fan I would highly recommend you wear some protective armor before you go back to the 330 shop because as Russel Peters says, "Somebody gonna get a hurt a reall baadd!"
Dave...I love your work, but how did you get access to the usFIRST's ftp server?
I think Dave recruited Joe since Joe has quite an extensive resume. The website is legit which means its an 'insider job' and since only few people got the email [instead of everybody, because there is no "Blast"] I suspect that it is very odd. Also I doubt that it would be Dave and Joe's plan to post it since people will automatically think it false if either of them did but I assume [yes I know what happens when I assume], that they didn't want anyone else in on it....
If I'm wrong... Dinner's on me in Atlanta in 2009! 
EDIT1 of many: I assume that to keep it sound legit, Dave also managed to get his 'insider' to send an email to a few select teams that have "trustworthy" people that don't have any history of anything other than superb [with the exception of Joe].
EDIT2: I hate you Dave/Joe. I was just about to go to sleep and I see this.... :$ ... Why must you do this to me?
16-12-2007 01:35
Arefin Bari
Jane, I am the alternate contact for team 1345 as well. Would you please forward me that email? Thanks.
... is there anybody on the forum who is a main contact or the alternate contact for their team and didn't receive this email?
Dave, you are killing me here. But... I am not going to lose the bet. You won't see a post from me analyzing the "clue." Try harder. =)
16-12-2007 01:41
Pavan Dave
16-12-2007 01:47
EricH
|
We need an IP check on this ASAP, both registration address as well as the post address. We need to confirm this came from NDI or NH.
|
16-12-2007 01:51
Barry Bonzack
|
We need an IP check on this ASAP, both registration address as well as the post address. We need to confirm this came from NDI or NH.
|
16-12-2007 02:07
Pavan Dave
|
As for the new toy, I'm in the boat of believing the robots will be talking with each other, or having multiple scoring object that the robots get bonus points for telling on which to score. I thought "AIM High" would have been more interesting with 3 lights, one above each of the goals.? |
16-12-2007 02:16
neutrino15I am guessing that there will be stations around the field that give data to the robot.. And the robot has to carry that data to another station..
Or maybe the IR stations would tell the robot which side of the field they need to score in? Which goals to use? That would be cool.. Imagine if each team was assigned a color during autonomous mode via IR blasters?! And the robot had to interpret this!!
::edit::
I really like this guess
Post 108
I would love to see the human player able to manipulate the field with a remote!
:::::::::
Maybe.. I just hope that the game doesn't require constant use of the IR sensor.. If they do, everyone in the audience will bring their TV remotes from their hotels!
On second thought, the clues are never 100% accurate.. So maybe it just has to do with HEAT.. IR senses heat (it is heat!).. So let's just assume the game has to do with heat.. Flamethrowers anyone!? Giant incinerators!??!? WEIGHTED COMPANION CUBES!!!!!


16-12-2007 02:40
ChrisH
|
In my opinion, the issue with IR in 2004 was that the transmitter needed to be built by hand from diodes, etc, and there wasn't enough incentive in the autonomous period to try to work with it. Don't forget, it was also the first year that teams had the PIC (vs the Basic Stamp), so they had to learn a new programming language as well.
Infrared as a technology could be well-done in FIRST, if it's well-supported and people have time to play with it. I think this just may be what FIRST is trying to do. If it's a DIFFERENT technology, then it very well could be FIRST's way of trying to provide us with some info ahead of time (once the site is active). |
16-12-2007 03:06
AndyB
My best guess is the possibility of the IR sensors receiving the value of the colored light (red, green, or blue). However, correct me if I'm wrong, but it is possible to look for all three colors with the CMU camera without too much of a problem...
Please everybody keep in mind that these are sensors, not transmitters... they receive. not get.
16-12-2007 03:19
Stuartyes the S1 element is 100%(or at least 99.999995%) an IR receiver, Ive built too many LIRC circuits to not recognize that thing. Im guessing this will be used as a way for the robot to communicate with the field(2way) or for the robots to communicate with each other(again 2way). again this is why I love this time of year eggnog, colorful lights in the house(both of the visible and non flavors), and hints about what Im going to be spending every spare second thinking about for the next 2 months.
16-12-2007 04:19
BoydeanWow...Im just now seeing this. From this point on the days are going to become very long.
16-12-2007 05:29
Leav
Official word says that Israeli teams will only get this at the kickoff..... 
This should help you on the speculating side I guess... It can't be that critical to send it out early if the ~40 teams here don't et it till the kickoff...
-Leav
16-12-2007 05:54
neutrino15|
Originally Posted by Stuart
Im guessing this will be used as a way for the robot to communicate with the field(2way) or for the robots to communicate with each other(again 2way).
|
16-12-2007 06:33
Richard McClellanWow, what a crazy game hint. I'm the alternate contact and shipping contact for 2158, and I didn't get any official email from FIRST
I think I'll be checking my mail all day on Monday though to see if I get anything in my mailbox 
16-12-2007 08:30
GaryVoshol
|
-This isn't going on the robot. The speak of powering it from a bench supply or AA batteries proves that.
|
|
It's also interesting that the unit has to be set up to "Learn" the codes that it's meant to respond to.... Do they really trust all the teams to "teach" their board the correct codes ???? Sure ... that'll happen.
|
16-12-2007 09:47
skimoose|
There were also a lot of "noise" issues. IR reflecting of of the field endwalls confused a lot of robots that did get sensors working. I seem to recall our robot tracking a brick wall once. Actually I think we were using an EduBot for a test bed at that point. An auto focusing video camera could interfere as well.
I think the use of coding is intended to help reduce inadvertent interference like that from the video cameras. But that still doesn't deal with reflections and an object does not have to be shinny to be a good IR reflector. The only way to prevent reflections from being an issue is to not give those photons anything to hit. |
16-12-2007 10:32
colin340
16-12-2007 10:34
colin340
and doesn't this mean no more ir flash on cameras
if you ever staffed a fll comp you know what i mean
16-12-2007 10:38
Bongle|
and doesn't this mean no more ir flash on cameras
if you ever staffed a fll comp you know what i mean |
16-12-2007 10:43
MilakiIf you all want the link is up because I just looked at it and it gives you a PDF file that gives instructions on the IR sensor (yes it is one) or at least a IR Control Decoder Board
16-12-2007 10:54
Libby K
|
We need an IP check on this ASAP, both registration address as well as the post address. We need to confirm this came from NDI or NH.
|
16-12-2007 11:24
Big Kidi know I'm a rookie and all this year but since someone suggested a IP trace i did my self the favor and ran a DNS trace and this is what my findings were.
The site's and the PDF file on the site's web registration is under the name of U.S. Fndn for Insp & Recog of Sci & Tech, which is none other then FIRST, the address registrated with the sites is 200 Bedford Street, Manchester, NH.
now, myself even with this information i have some doubts about the "hint"
16-12-2007 11:38
Jeff K.
Was it even meant to be a game hint? But it could have to do with a field component, like an IR beacon. That would be cool.
16-12-2007 11:44
Big Kidaccually it more like FIRST may be telling us that we will or might have to put that thing on our robots, if this is offical and not just some hoax, to be successful on accomplishing the main goal in this year's game.
16-12-2007 11:49
Bill MooreReading the PDF, it references this board as a modified TinyIR2 from TaunTek.
Acknowledgement is also given to Vishay for donating the IR Sensors. The bottom series looks like the sensor in the upper right corner of Joe's photo. (I couldn't see the part ID in the photo.)
Does any of this help you electrical types narrow the purpose?
16-12-2007 11:49
AdamHeard
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this yet......
but, Joe pulled off the canceled championship hoax in 2003.
So, I wouldn't put it past him for it to be a hoax, and if it is in fact real, the mischievousness of FIRST by sending it to someone known for a hoax is awesome.... perhaps Dave's doing?
16-12-2007 12:00
Akash Rastogi|
It is fake, I assure you. I know i've said that, but with all the speculation I'm sure it got skipped over.
I like the 'random active goals' idea. A lot. a lot a lot. EDIT: Also, I have received the email as the shipping contact for team 1923. |

16-12-2007 12:02
vivek16|
Was it even meant to be a game hint? But it could have to do with a field component, like an IR beacon. That would be cool.
|
16-12-2007 12:19
JaneYoung
Just a thought here,
If there are packages that are to go out to the main contacts or alternates, many of them would be delivered to schools most likely. Next week is the last week of school for many as the holidays approach. To create a hint that involves delivery, it would make sense that the information came out this early. Lots of logistics involved in this one.
16-12-2007 12:25
billbo911Just for the sake of argument, I'll bite.
I'm going to put two things together and see if we can get a little closer to the/an answer.
In Atlanta, Woodie said, "Just be careful about the stock market, with jello, gerbils, and K'nex blocks."
To me, the stock market is full of ups and downs. I won't touch jello and gerbils, but K'nex blocks..... Remember the three basic First scoring shapes.
Now, add in this new detector. It is a receiver, not a transmitting unit. IR in generates 100ms +5vdc pulse. Up to 4 discreet outputs.
OK, here is what my polluted mind comes up with.
A part of this years game will be goals that transmit an IR signal indicating where (think height) the goal is. Some higher, some lower (ups and downs). We will be using a rectangular or square scoring piece.
You can either manually position the scoring item at the right height, or, using the input from the IR transmitter, automatically (autonomously) position it.
My guess is they will not be using a 38KHz transmitter to limit the amount of reflected and false signals on the field. (See the PDF for the "Gift board", page 2 at the end of section 4)
OK, fire away and tear this apart, or, support this with solid evidence.
16-12-2007 12:28
EricH
|
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this yet......
but, Joe pulled off the canceled championship hoax in 2003. So, I wouldn't put it past him for it to be a hoax, and if it is in fact real, the mischievousness of FIRST by sending it to someone known for a hoax is awesome.... perhaps Dave's doing? ![]() |
16-12-2007 12:30
IndySam
|
My guess is they will be using a 38KHz transmitter to limit the amount of reflected and false signals on the field. (See the PDF for the "Gift board", page 2 at the end of section 4)
|
16-12-2007 12:34
henryBsick
Autonomous use.
Field will have transmitter.
IR receiver will be present on each robot to recognize the field's signal then react accordingly:
-go to a certain area and get a certain game element?
-score pre-loaded game elements in specified location?
-defend opponents scoring area?
-The Sick Word
(waitin for a riddle)
16-12-2007 12:40
Robostang 548Ok, I don't really have any ideas or theories as to what this thing is for but I'm pretty sure that it is either going to be on the field or on the robot. What I'm wondering is if because teams are now using a KOP item that uses the IR spectrum, if there will be a rule in the 2008 manual that will be restrict teams from using other IR devices because of this. My team used an IR range finder for our autonomous mode last year and we have been talking about using one for next year. We've already spent a bunch of money on some newer IR range finders and this device may end up keeping us from using them. Even if we cant use them, this receiver is probably going to be an awesome part of next years game.
-Don
16-12-2007 12:42
Eric ScheuingCMD0? Are our robots going to be running around without any underwear this year?
16-12-2007 12:51
Big Kid|
4 Training the Chip
If you have successfully trained the FIRST IR board, but find that it does not respond when the remote is positioned more than a few feet away, the remote is probably not using a 38KHz modulation frequency. To solve this, switch to a different remote (or setting on a universal remote) and re-train. oooooo great find billbo. This indicates they expect it to be used from a distance not up close. |
16-12-2007 12:53
neoshaaktialright maybe the game will be playing a a hamster wheel shaped field that rotates horizontally
and in each ladder part of the wheel, there is are different colored game pieces that robots have to bring back to their home zone to construct some kind of wall
the stockexchange is on wallstreet (Ithink) ...which was historically built as the nourthern boundary of new amsterdam...
so maybe ure trying to build a wall out of game pieces to keep out ure alliance from your homezone...
idk might not be feasible for a 2 minute game...idk
16-12-2007 12:54
bear24rw|
CMD0? Are our robots going to be running around without any underwear this year?
|
16-12-2007 12:54
Bill Moore|
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this yet......
but, Joe pulled off the canceled championship hoax in 2003. So, I wouldn't put it past him for it to be a hoax, and if it is in fact real, the mischievousness of FIRST by sending it to someone known for a hoax is awesome.... perhaps Dave's doing? ![]() |
16-12-2007 13:04
EricH
|
Adam,
Agreed, Joe has either pulled off (or has tried to pull off) a number of hoaxes on this website. He has reached the point where he needs collaborators to accomplish these. First, it is posted in "Extra Discussion" rather than in a real forum. Joe knows better than to post his hoaxes in a real forum. Also, why of all people was Joe (a noted prankster) the very first to receive this misdelivery? Second, all the initial collaborators seem suspiciously close to Joe or to his team. Perhaps a case of "You lie, and I'll swear to it." But the circle of folks claiming to receive the phantom FIRST Email Blast has grown beyond Joe's influence. Either the Blast is real, or we have folks jumping on a "Me Too!" bandwagon. The PDF document appears to come from the FIRST website. I doubt that Joe would take a chance by spoofing the FIRST site, so he would need some inside help to upload the document. NOTE: The document author is not fully named, it only lists the name "kpilotte", which was assumed to be Kate Pilotte. It is not difficult to change the "author" of a document, and lack of a full name brings this document into question. But, to further cloud the question, the board that Joe has photographed, and the board on the PDF document are not the same. (Or some Photoshopping has taken place.) The "quality mark" on Joe's board is positioned slightly different than the one in the PDF photo. You also have to wonder why three fonts are used on the circuit board; one for the URL, one for the component layout, but the final part of the copyright text (FIRST") is in a slightly larger font than the beginning part. It would seem that when putting a copyright symbol onto a board design they would know who holds the rights. Finally, Dave loves to see these things mushroom, and he will gleefully post his most devilish laugh as he watches all the lemmings rush over the cliff! |
16-12-2007 13:09
IndySam
|
Adam,
But, to further cloud the question, the board that Joe has photographed, and the board on the PDF document are not the same. (Or some Photoshopping has taken place.) The "quality mark" on Joe's board is positioned slightly different than the one in the PDF photo. You also have to wonder why three fonts are used on the circuit board; one for the URL, one for the component layout, but the final part of the copyright text (FIRST") is in a slightly larger font than the beginning part. It would seem that when putting a copyright symbol onto a board design they would know who holds the rights. |
16-12-2007 13:13
MrForbes
|
Second, all the initial collaborators seem suspiciously close to Joe or to his team. Perhaps a case of "You lie, and I'll swear to it." But the circle of folks claiming to receive the phantom FIRST Email Blast has grown beyond Joe's influence. Either the Blast is real, or we have folks jumping on a "Me Too!" bandwagon.
|
16-12-2007 13:14
artdutra04
|
Adam,
Agreed, Joe has either pulled off (or has tried to pull off) a number of hoaxes on this website. He has reached the point where he needs collaborators to accomplish these. First, it is posted in "Extra Discussion" rather than in a real forum. Joe knows better than to post his hoaxes in a real forum. Also, why of all people was Joe (a noted prankster) the very first to receive this misdelivery? Second, all the initial collaborators seem suspiciously close to Joe or to his team. Perhaps a case of "You lie, and I'll swear to it." But the circle of folks claiming to receive the phantom FIRST Email Blast has grown beyond Joe's influence. Either the Blast is real, or we have folks jumping on a "Me Too!" bandwagon. The PDF document appears to come from the FIRST website. I doubt that Joe would take a chance by spoofing the FIRST site, so he would need some inside help to upload the document. NOTE: The document author is not fully named, it only lists the name "kpilotte", which was assumed to be Kate Pilotte. It is not difficult to change the "author" of a document, and lack of a full name brings this document into question. But, to further cloud the question, the board that Joe has photographed, and the board on the PDF document are not the same. (Or some Photoshopping has taken place.) The "quality mark" on Joe's board is positioned slightly different than the one in the PDF photo. You also have to wonder why three fonts are used on the circuit board; one for the URL, one for the component layout, but the final part of the copyright text (FIRST") is in a slightly larger font than the beginning part. It would seem that when putting a copyright symbol onto a board design they would know who holds the rights. Finally, Dave loves to see these things mushroom, and he will gleefully post his most devilish laugh as he watches all the lemmings rush over the cliff! |
16-12-2007 13:18
MrForbes
|
If I was on the GDC, I know I would find anything involving a game hint in a thread to be really amusing.
![]() |
16-12-2007 13:29
Kevin Sevcik
Just to toss one more against the hoax theory, I just looked at the email headers on the blast, and they're exactly the same as any other, so it's an official blast. So at this point it's either legit, or Joe's one heck of a hacker with lots of inside help, etc. etc. So I think Occam's Razor should really put all the paranoia to bed at this point and let us get on with our rampant speculation.
So has anyone else wondered what the big white connector is for? I'd be able to make a more intelligent guess if I had the board in front of me, but I've a sneaking suspicion it's the programming interface. So if this was for reading a field element, setting up a robot would be as easy as plugging in a programming cable during inspection.
16-12-2007 13:29
Big Kid|
Adam,
Agreed, Joe has either pulled off (or has tried to pull off) a number of hoaxes on this website. He has reached the point where he needs collaborators to accomplish these. First, it is posted in "Extra Discussion" rather than in a real forum. Joe knows better than to post his hoaxes in a real forum. Also, why of all people was Joe (a noted prankster) the very first to receive this misdelivery? Second, all the initial collaborators seem suspiciously close to Joe or to his team. Perhaps a case of "You lie, and I'll swear to it." But the circle of folks claiming to receive the phantom FIRST Email Blast has grown beyond Joe's influence. Either the Blast is real, or we have folks jumping on a "Me Too!" bandwagon. The PDF document appears to come from the FIRST website. I doubt that Joe would take a chance by spoofing the FIRST site, so he would need some inside help to upload the document. NOTE: The document author is not fully named, it only lists the name "kpilotte", which was assumed to be Kate Pilotte. It is not difficult to change the "author" of a document, and lack of a full name brings this document into question. But, to further cloud the question, the board that Joe has photographed, and the board on the PDF document are not the same. (Or some Photoshopping has taken place.) The "quality mark" on Joe's board is positioned slightly different than the one in the PDF photo. You also have to wonder why three fonts are used on the circuit board; one for the URL, one for the component layout, but the final part of the copyright text (FIRST") is in a slightly larger font than the beginning part. It would seem that when putting a copyright symbol onto a board design they would know who holds the rights. Finally, Dave loves to see these things mushroom, and he will gleefully post his most devilish laugh as he watches all the lemmings rush over the cliff! |
16-12-2007 13:35
Mr BTo me, the most reasonable explanation is that there will be some IR transmitters on the field that send dynamic game information to the robot which interprets it with this board. The field would transmit a code that activates one of the digital outs on the board which can then be used to redirect the gameplay. This opens up a whole world of possibilities both in auto and tele-game periods that go way beyond telling your robot what color light is shining. The game objectives could be changed either in a preset or random fashion - or even by the robots themselves. Consider a field element that looks like a bumper but acts like a switch, so that a robot could actually change the light color... or open a goal... or modify the bonus multiplier - any of which could be transmitted to your robot as new game information.
In 2K4, I got the vibe that the FIRST game developers had high hopes for the IR devices. Unfortunately reflections and interference (and the lack of available trig calculations on the robot) made them cumbersome to use. It was simply easier to navigate around the field using encoders and gyros. Since the new ones are transmitting information, reflections won't matter - they might even help. I believe that if this thing is real, and they get it to work, we will see this device for years to come as it adds a whole new dimension to the strategy. 2K8 is gonna be sweet!
16-12-2007 13:37
legomaster3945first of all i think this is not a hoax from first and that it is legit but not the whole story
just giving us some random object (ok so its not compleatly random they must have given it to us for a purpouse) without telling us much more is not much of a game hint
also if you look at the email (i cannot verify at this time whether my teacher has recived it yet (i know i had his cell phone number at one point in time
) so i cant reach him) but it says that this is the season for hints, but "keep your eye out for a December gift from FRC and the game design committee"
gifts aren't clues
they're gifts
so i think there will be at least a riddle coming soon
also another weird fact is that this email everyone is gettin is not listed here
1 other question
i am not 100% electronically knowledgeable but im not used to seeing red boards
could this colour reference more than just being there by chance
mabey we can expect as triangle(from first logo (its red
)) as one of the objects in this years game
oh how i wish it was january 5th (im not rushing anything, i swear)
16-12-2007 13:41
Graham DonaldsonGetting away from all the hoax stuff...
ASSUMING this is real, then...
|
sounds like a frendly game of robot basketball, seriously, used for launching basketballs into a net from a distance with the IR board reciveing info on how high and far the baskets are from the robot
edit: just a thought |
-
16-12-2007 13:42
lukevanoort
|
Just to toss one more against the hoax theory, I just looked at the email headers on the blast, and they're exactly the same as any other, so it's an official blast. So at this point it's either legit, or Joe's one heck of a hacker with lots of inside help, etc. etc. So I think Occam's Razor should really put all the paranoia to bed at this point and let us get on with our rampant speculation.
|
16-12-2007 13:44
Billfred
|
And something tells me we won't see a game where you're firing balls at something for another couple years- Aim High was only two years ago.
|
16-12-2007 13:51
synth3tk
|
[...] just giving us some random object (ok so its not compleatly random they must have given it to us for a purpouse) without telling us much more is not much of a game hint
also if you look at the email (i cannot verify at this time whether my teacher has recived it yet (i know i had his cell phone number at one point in time ) so i cant reach him) but it says that this is the season for hints, but "keep your eye out for a December gift from FRC and the game design committee" gifts aren't clues they're gifts so i think there will be at least a riddle coming soon [...] |
|
[...] also another weird fact is that this email everyone is gettin is not listed here
1 other question i am not 100% electronically knowledgeable but im not used to seeing red boards [...] |
16-12-2007 13:54
JaneYoung
|
(and it would be a big bonus if the hint inspired some of those people to play around with robot programming and design concepts over their winter break) |
16-12-2007 14:07
MrForbes
16-12-2007 14:16
EricH
16-12-2007 14:22
Branden Ghena
Which part actually receives the IR signals, is it the piece labeled S1?
16-12-2007 14:23
MrForbes
The white connector is most likely for programming the PIC. Seems power comes from the 10 pin header connector.
Yes, S1 is the sensor.
16-12-2007 14:23
vivek16@tawnos23 yeah it is. that big sphere/cube looking thing
16-12-2007 14:28
Pavan Dave
... *sigh* ... Dave, Joe ... pick a night in '09.... I guess I have lost.
16-12-2007 14:34
vivek16|
... *sigh* ... Dave, Joe ... pick a night in '09.... I guess I have lost.
|
16-12-2007 14:46
AndyB
|
OK, so since I was bored, and looking at the pic of the board for quite some time.. I decided to google some random things and see what I can find.
The order of the D codes above the LED's is D2, D5, D4, D3 & then D1. The number 25431 is the zip code for the town of none other than Levels, West Virgina. |
16-12-2007 14:51
vivek16This has been mentioned before but: It would be cool if there were different targets that you had to sense which was the right one using IR and then use that one. I am putting my money on that right now. Prove me wrong and get a penny and some pocket lint 
thanks, vivek
16-12-2007 14:58
Grant Cox
|
Question: Did the teams who received the email also get the board, or vice versa? Or did you get one or the other?
|
16-12-2007 14:58
MrForbes
How about using a remote control to select one of 4 (or 16) autonomous modes after the field initialization?
I'd be playing with the hint board and last year's robot to see if I could make it do different things just by "changing channels" on an old TV remote (available at any thrift store)
16-12-2007 15:08
AndyB
I don't think FIRST would take that risk, due to the fact that some moron with a universal remote sitting in the stands could probably alter the game...
16-12-2007 15:12
vivek16|
I don't think FIRST would take that risk, due to the fact that some moron with a universal remote sitting in the stands could probably alter the game...
|
16-12-2007 15:14
StephLee
|
I don't think FIRST would take that risk, due to the fact that some moron with a universal remote sitting in the stands could probably alter the game...
|
16-12-2007 15:16
angelSAYWell guys here's what I think:
The IR board says "2007 FIRST". I think this means we could be using 2007's Inflatable Rings again.
16-12-2007 15:18
MrForbes
|
I don't think FIRST would take that risk, due to the fact that some moron with a universal remote sitting in the stands could probably alter the game...
|
16-12-2007 15:25
AndyB
|
That would apply to ANY use of the game hint board, wouldn't it?
|
16-12-2007 15:28
dtengineering
|
How about using a remote control to select one of 4 (or 16) autonomous modes after the field initialization?
I'd be playing with the hint board and last year's robot to see if I could make it do different things just by "changing channels" on an old TV remote (available at any thrift store) |
16-12-2007 15:50
KF987Did any one check the 2008 Blast Archive? I didnt see anything about a "December Gift" in there...
Keaton
16-12-2007 15:52
Nica F.
They tell us rhyming riddles, post crazy images, and send us things to examine.
I have a feeling that next year the hint will be to stick your hand in a box like those Halloween games where you put your hand in dog food or something and you have to guess what it is.
(but of course instead there will be distorted melted things that disappear after a minute just to make it more complicated. lol)
16-12-2007 15:54
ZachKahn
Here are my sleep deprived thoughts.
In the User Guide under step 5. Operation it states the signal is the strongest in an angle of roughly +/- 30-40 degrees from the normal... Hmm staying on course, stay the course, something presidential, the president works in the oval office, alas! oval shaped game objects. - Game objects will be white considering the color of the White House.
Can be trained with a universal remote... a tv watching robot competition. Bonus points will be awarded to the robot that switches their tv to the Colbert Show with Dean Kamen being interviewed.
This is a receiving device and therefore I think that it has to do with strengthening our autonomous mode. For the past two years, FIRST has given us the option of tracking a green light. This may be an alternative or an addition to the process. The robot may receive a signal from a field transmitter and act accordingly. This signal could never come from any human operator for that would defeat the purpose of autonomous mode. The receiver would be programmed at the beginning of a regional event to correspond to the events specific transmitter.
Hmm IR is a sensor that reads a certain spectrum of light, light is always prominent during the competition, maybe there will be various light sources (4?) the robot will be able to utilize during a match.
Of course, this is all speculation. However, my final idea comes back to the remote control idea. I'm thinking about when a pesky neighbor has a remote to your tv and they change the channel while you're watching it. Just imagine a randomizer or FIRST official that uses this receiver to disable it or make it function in a different way. Dave will have a master remote to all of our robots!!!
Happy holidays everyone!!! 20 days to go.
16-12-2007 15:58
EricRobodoxWhat if... since we all are making hypothesis... that the IR will be on each robot to tell them which period it is in, as in offense or defense or free for all, like 2006 game. Which may mean multiple autonomous modes... as the IR will tell the robot which state its in? Or it could mean that autonoumous mode is broken up into parts or autonomous mode may be different per match so that some times one team will be offense or one team will be defense.
I am so excited I can hardly finish up my last few college apps (4 left out of 15).
16-12-2007 15:59
DonRotolo
|
I am guessing that there will be stations around the field that give data to the robot.. And the robot has to carry that data to another station..
|
|
My guess is they will not be using a 38KHz transmitter to limit the amount of reflected and false signals on the field.
|
16-12-2007 16:11
StephLee
|
Teams will need to change autonomous*** strategies after the field is set and teams are at the player stations, but before the match begins. This board allows that.
|
16-12-2007 16:15
dr1008|
Changing your autonomous mode from the players' station - doesn't that come really close to defeating the purpose of the autonomy of it? If you need to change your autonomous at the last minute, a binary switch on the RC can do that very easily...
|
16-12-2007 16:18
Cooley744Wow. I'm really confused and my brain hurts. Watch this really be a hoax. lol that would be great.
16-12-2007 16:22
AndyB
|
Changing your autonomous mode from the players' station - doesn't that come really close to defeating the purpose of the autonomy of it? If you need to change your autonomous at the last minute, a binary switch on the RC can do that very easily...
|
16-12-2007 16:25
StephLee
|
That's about as exciting as making a sandwich... or maybe thinking about making a sandwich...
|
16-12-2007 16:27
AndyB
|
Probably thinking about it; seeing a robot trying to handle mayo might be at least a little funny, if not exciting...
|
16-12-2007 16:29
Billfred
|
I agree. Seems like a lot of effort for so little purpose... Also, commenting on people's ideas of "robots going from station to station to get data" would that not be the most boring game you've ever seen. Seriously, if that was the game, I'd cry. I can just see it now... everyone sitting in the stands and an announcer trying to sound enthusiastic about a robot getting data...
That's about as exciting as making a sandwich... or maybe thinking about making a sandwich... |
16-12-2007 16:32
AndyB
I like the idea someone else came up with of using the infared soccer ball that was posted earlier.
A game piece involving infared would be more interesting... I don't know why you would need an infared sensor to use it though... unless you wanted to get to this game piece during autonomous mode...
Thinking about it, the real question we need to be asking is: why the need to go infared when we already have the CMUcam...
16-12-2007 16:34
vivek16|
I agree. Seems like a lot of effort for so little purpose... Also, commenting on people's ideas of "robots going from station to station to get data to score points": would that not be the most boring game you've ever seen. Seriously, if that was the game, I'd cry. I can just see it now... everyone sitting in the stands and an announcer trying to sound enthusiastic about a robot getting data...
That's about as exciting as making a sandwich... or maybe thinking about making a sandwich... |

16-12-2007 16:36
AndyB
|
YEAH!! Look at those 0's and 1's just fly into team xxxx's IR chip!! Yes ladies and gentlemen, they are moving at the speed of light! Aww, it looks like they got knocked over....
At least the game pieces wouldn't get stuck on the freaking flag ![]() -vivek |
16-12-2007 16:41
DonRotolo
|
Probably thinking about it; seeing a robot trying to handle mayo might be at least a little funny, if not exciting...
|
16-12-2007 16:45
njamietechhonestly, I can't get a clear idea of what this is used for.
but I wonder if they are leaving out an item left in the kit. Such as a transmitter perhaps?
Perhaps we will be able to interact with other robots without harming them. (like lazer tag).
One thing I have noticed is that we are forgetting that FIRST may have left other parts relating to this device in the kit and secret.
We should probably take into account the possibility of items kept secret.
16-12-2007 16:45
WillItBlend
|
well the pdf was created friday december 14th 2007 at 3:39:46 pm by adobe distiller....nothing spectacular...the author though is kpilotte after a quick google search it turns out theres a photobucket account with that username http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v641/kpilotte/ and a stumbleupn account http://kpilotte.stumbleupon.com/ an ilounge account http://forums.ilounge.com/showthread.php?t=57728 and something promising is she had an @usfirst.org email address... http://www.sensorsmag.com/sensors/Se.../detail/314079 under more sensors please. from what i gather she is part of FIRST's sensor development team.
kinda crazy lol may be useful idk |
16-12-2007 16:48
AndyB
I'll say it again... this IS the game piece... get your circuit board harvesters ready!
16-12-2007 16:52
vivek16|
I'll say it again... this IS the game piece... get your circuit board harvesters ready!
|

16-12-2007 16:56
WillItBlend
Ok, so basically, I would have to guess this in fact is what will be in the KOP, but considering you only get one end of the wire in this "hint" there will be a complete set in the '08 KOP. What? Like 20 more days now?
16-12-2007 16:58
Aren_Hill
Interesting. This makes me think of the Mindstorms RCX in the fact i've used it as a jammer to stop people from changing the tv channel away from the one i'm watching, simply by telling it to send message 1-10 and repeat. That completely jammed the remote from getting any response out of the tv.
My thoughts are this will go on the robot to respond to how the fields setup.
And being able to use any tv remote allows you to emulate the actual field.
Im picturing a large transmitter (or several small ones preferably) placed around the outside of the field that send messages to the robots be it autonomous or normal gameplay.
16-12-2007 17:02
WillItBlend
Oh btw I believe the other end of the cable is an exact replica, so maybe thats how FIRST saved money on shipping these out, they just snipped these in half lol. Considering it will have a replica opposote side, there may be some piece that was not included in the hint but will be included in the KOP. The part may either be a field element such as a ball, or a part placed on the robot. If no other part will be in the KOP, then obviously this IR thing will be installed somewhere upon the field, and this thing will in fact be used to train the bot to adhere to any autonomous controls on the field. I hope that made sense.
16-12-2007 17:04
Josh Fox
haha ever since I've seen that site ive broken that out at every oppurtunity... and it was all thatks to Dave's post on another thread i can't recall...so on behalf of me and my group of friends I thank you for another inside joke...
[start insane conjecture] maybe this is an elaborate plan to keep us away from our computers playing with this while the real game hint is released! or not [/conjecture]
16-12-2007 17:07
vivek16|
[start insane conjecture] maybe this is an elaborate plan to keep us away from our computers playing with this while the real game hint is released! or not [/conjecture]
|

16-12-2007 17:10
Simon Strauss
We are given a rainbow ribbon wire for an infrared receiver, am i the only one who thinks the absence of ultra violet means something?
perhaps ultra violet is supposed to clue us to some sort of sun related theme or game piece.
16-12-2007 17:20
Blue_MistThat's incredible, two pages came up in the twenty minutes that I was reading all the posts that came up overnight. And at least 16 members looking at this page. For what I originally intended to say, 766 hasn't gotten our package or email yet, or our contact is unavailable. 
16-12-2007 17:22
vivek16well, it is a sunday so our school is closed and mail/fedex doesnt work on sunday? correct me if im wrong.
-vivek
16-12-2007 17:23
WillItBlend
|
Nah, didn't you hear? Dave isn't even in the GDC this year.
-vivek EDIT: ![]() EDIT2: You know you are addicted to FIRST when you have been sitting here on the gaem hint page for 7 hours on a sunday... |
16-12-2007 17:24
EricH
|
well, it is a sunday so our school is closed and mail/fedex doesnt work on sunday? correct me if im wrong.
-vivek |
16-12-2007 17:30
vivek16waait a minute... Is that piece of paper in the picture smaller than 8x11? I hope so. Other wise those led's must be huge!
-vivek
16-12-2007 17:53
vivek16
16-12-2007 17:55
Richard McClellan|
Just to toss one more against the hoax theory, I just looked at the email headers on the blast, and they're exactly the same as any other, so it's an official blast. So at this point it's either legit, or Joe's one heck of a hacker with lots of inside help, etc. etc. So I think Occam's Razor should really put all the paranoia to bed at this point and let us get on with our rampant speculation.
So has anyone else wondered what the big white connector is for? I'd be able to make a more intelligent guess if I had the board in front of me, but I've a sneaking suspicion it's the programming interface. So if this was for reading a field element, setting up a robot would be as easy as plugging in a programming cable during inspection. |
I want one of these things soooo badly now....
16-12-2007 18:09
vivek16ok, Im going to get off CD for a day or two until our team can confirm this thing.
-vivek
16-12-2007 18:12
fimmel|
XD You know youre addicted to first when Chief Delphi is on your FireFox bookmarks toolbar.
|
16-12-2007 18:12
teh_r4v3That white 6-pin connector looks like it might be a standard ICSP connector, used for programming the PIC. This opens up the possibility of loading custom code onto the board, but I have a feeling that FIRST won't allow that.
16-12-2007 18:14
Aren_Hill
Oh and Kate Pilotte was in charge of the 07 K.O.P.
our team 1625 and 111 wildstang attended a sensor expo summer of 2006.
While we were there I knew she was hunting around for sponsors so being my curious self i kept a close eye on who she talked to
.
The second day of it however we had our oh so brilliant minded animator (also my arch enemy
), was the only person who could go and he didn't keep an eye on her!! so if he had payed attention that day we may know the exact background of this thing. CURSE YOU PETE!!! (buddyb309)
16-12-2007 18:14
Donut
Ah, another fun game hint (or what appears to be one) only a few weeks before kickoff, just to torment us all further. Who else loves the Christmas season?
Now, my weigh ins on some previously mentioned ideas as well as my own...
1. Although cool, I don't see this as an inter-robot communication device. Each alliance would be limited to only 4 signals they could send between the robots, and for them to mean anything, there would have to be a universally adopted code between all teams in FIRST. Every team would have to know that receiving a COM0 signal means "head to left side of field", "score gampiece", "inflate clown balloon", etc. To be honest that seems like a rather boring use of signals, as only four commands for the whole alliance doesn't give many options in terms of what to do.
2. Is this the end of the CMUCam? With the success and usefulness it's gained in more recent auto-modes, I don't see the camera ever leaving competition permanently, but I do think FIRST could take a break from it. The camera has already been mastered by a few teams, and alot have it working, even if the rest of their auto isn't up with it. I see a departure from cameras for a few years in favor of IR challenges, such as back in 2004, so everyone has a challenge again. Then once we've all figured this one out we may go back to the cameras, combine them both, or go on to something else new.
3. If FIRST does actually intend on using remote controls with these (not just as a test method), they will have to supply their own special controllers at competitions. Otherwise the risk is too high that two teams will bring the same remotes and use the same buttons, which would guarantee interference. Human players directing robots with remote controls would be interesting, perhaps a section of the field will be obscured from driver view or will have driver control removed so that only the remote may operate the robot? I hope such a system wouldn't be implemented in autonomous mode, as this would defeat the point of it (something about no human control...).
4. I keep having a leering suspicion of something akin to a game suggestion I made last year, involving goals with lights above that didn't turn on to indicate which alliance they scored for until autonomous began. Imagine four goals on the field each with an IR emitter that doesn't activate until autonomous begins. Two goals send out a signal indicating red goal, while the other two send out signals to signify a blue goal. Which goals score for which alliance are random each match, making a dead reckoning autonomous potential suicide in which you score 20 points for your opponents. Visual alliance indicators are then revealed after autonomous so teams that don't attempt to find the signal may still score in operator mode.
Unlike 2004 when teams had to figure out which emitter they were looking at themselves, FIRST is already giving us the tools to distinguish between multiple IR transmissions on field. Sounds like they must want us to use it for something, all will be explained on January 5th, but I really don't want to wait quite so long.
16-12-2007 18:19
Tottanka
|
4. I keep having a leering suspicion of something akin to a game suggestion I made last year, involving goals with lights above that didn't turn on to indicate which alliance they scored for until autonomous began. Imagine four goals on the field each with an IR emitter that doesn't activate until autonomous begins. Two goals send out a signal indicating red goal, while the other two send out signals to signify a blue goal. Which goals score for which alliance are random each match, making a dead reckoning autonomous potential suicide in which you score 20 points for your opponents. Visual alliance indicators are then revealed after autonomous so teams that don't attempt to find the signal may still score in operator mode.
|
16-12-2007 18:25
rspurlinI'm one of the alternates for our team and I did receive the email. I checked the message headers and it does appear to originate from FIRST. It will be tomorrow before I can check at the school to see if we've received a package.
I don't think this is a hoax, although how relevant it will be to the 2008 game is yet to be seen.
16-12-2007 18:28
Akash Rastogi|
ok, Im going to get off CD for a day or two until our team can confirm this thing.
-vivek |
16-12-2007 18:31
Tottanka
|
Vivek, we all know that doing this is physically impossible.
Anyone thinking Wii nunchuck controlled robots? ![]() |
16-12-2007 18:36
ggoldmanHey CD!! HAPPY HOLIDAYS!
I have a cool idea (which probably is a couple years away in terms of FIRST actually doing it..but MAYBE it will be for this year.)
FIRST becoming economical....VIRTUAL GAME PIECES
Even though FIRST usually has their game pieces at least partially donated by supplier partners, a very interesting concept to me would be virtual game pieces.
Imagine a game in which there are four locations on the field with integrated IR signal emitters that give out a red, blue, green, or yellow signal (for example) when a robot comes up to it with their IR receiver.
Once the team is within range of the receiver, the signal is picked up by the robot and a beacon (maybe like a LED light on the robot) lights up the color given out by the IR signal. This is equivalent to a Virtual Game Piece.
Bringing the virtual game piece to the correct colored goal scores a point.
Advantages of this idea:
1) no need for game pieces....(Saves LOTS of money for teams and FIRST)
2) instant score board updates (since it is all controlled by the IR signals)
3) Game is different every time since you might not know which color you will get at each station.
Disadvantages:
1) Not sure if we will have IR transmitters too...to send the goal the scoring info.
2) Unlikely that FIRST will ever get rid of a real game scoring piece...this might be used for a bonus or big point objective.
As always...I am probably over analyzing the situation...but thats what I do best
-Gabe G.
16-12-2007 18:37
vivek16|
Vivek, we all know that doing this is physically impossible.
Anyone thinking Wii nunchuck controlled robots? ![]() |
-vivek
16-12-2007 18:37
lukevanoort
|
How about Guitar Hero guitars controlled robots? How cool would that be!
|
16-12-2007 18:39
vivek16|
Hey CD!! HAPPY HOLIDAYS!
I have a cool idea (which probably is a couple years away in terms of FIRST actually doing it..but MAYBE it will be for this year.) FIRST becoming economical....VIRTUAL GAME PIECES Even though FIRST usually has their game pieces at least partially donated by supplier partners, a very interesting concept to me would be virtual game pieces. Imagine a game in which there are four locations on the field with integrated IR signal emitters that give out a red, blue, green, or yellow signal (for example) when a robot comes up to it with their IR receiver. Once the team is within range of the receiver, the signal is picked up by the robot and a beacon (maybe like a LED light on the robot) lights up the color given out by the IR signal. This is equivalent to a Virtual Game Piece. Bringing the virtual game piece to the correct colored goal scores a point. Advantages of this idea: 1) no need for game pieces....(Saves LOTS of money for teams and FIRST) 2) instant score board updates (since it is all controlled by the IR signals) 3) Game is different every time since you might not know which color you will get at each station. Disadvantages: 1) Not sure if we will have IR transmitters too...to send the goal the scoring info. 2) Unlikely that FIRST will ever get rid of a real game scoring piece...this might be used for a bonus or big point objective. As always...I am probably over analyzing the situation...but thats what I do best ![]() -Gabe G. |
16-12-2007 18:48
RKElectricalmanmaybe 4 LED's mean 4 team on the field as opposed to 6!
meaning possibly a 2v2 instead of a 3v3 or maybe even a free for all with 4 robots?
So 4 unique commands for 4 unique robots?... maybe? 
*Edit* 4 "receiving" LEDS + Error LED *edit*
16-12-2007 18:52
Elgin Clock
|
CMD0? Are our robots going to be running around without any underwear this year?
|

|
They tell us rhyming riddles, post crazy images, and send us things to examine.
I have a feeling that next year the hint will be to stick your hand in a box like those Halloween games where you put your hand in dog food or something and you have to guess what it is. (but of course instead there will be distorted melted things that disappear after a minute just to make it more complicated. lol) |
16-12-2007 18:56
clydefrog88
i was thinking of an explanation the email not being the usual FIRST email blast. Perhaps, if the email's were indeed falsified, the perpetrator(s) searched the CD members list for those listing their team role as a mentor, and sent the supposed FIRST email to them (accounting for alternate contacts who have not received the email). The email inconsistency and the fact that i cannot navigate to the circuit board documentation using the FIRST site (I can only get to it through the URL in the picture) both keep me hesitant to totally believe this is the real deal. But then again, maybe it is.
16-12-2007 19:03
AndyB
|
Hey CD!! HAPPY HOLIDAYS!
I have a cool idea (which probably is a couple years away in terms of FIRST actually doing it..but MAYBE it will be for this year.) FIRST becoming economical....VIRTUAL GAME PIECES Even though FIRST usually has their game pieces at least partially donated by supplier partners, a very interesting concept to me would be virtual game pieces. Imagine a game in which there are four locations on the field with integrated IR signal emitters that give out a red, blue, green, or yellow signal (for example) when a robot comes up to it with their IR receiver. Once the team is within range of the receiver, the signal is picked up by the robot and a beacon (maybe like a LED light on the robot) lights up the color given out by the IR signal. This is equivalent to a Virtual Game Piece. Bringing the virtual game piece to the correct colored goal scores a point. Advantages of this idea: 1) no need for game pieces....(Saves LOTS of money for teams and FIRST) 2) instant score board updates (since it is all controlled by the IR signals) 3) Game is different every time since you might not know which color you will get at each station. Disadvantages: 1) Not sure if we will have IR transmitters too...to send the goal the scoring info. 2) Unlikely that FIRST will ever get rid of a real game scoring piece...this might be used for a bonus or big point objective. As always...I am probably over analyzing the situation...but thats what I do best ![]() -Gabe G. |
|
I agree. Seems like a lot of effort for so little purpose... Also, commenting on people's ideas of "robots going from station to station to get data to score points": would that not be the most boring game you've ever seen. Seriously, if that was the game, I'd cry. I can just see it now... everyone sitting in the stands and an announcer trying to sound enthusiastic about a robot getting data...
That's about as exciting as making a sandwich... or maybe thinking about making a sandwich... |
16-12-2007 19:12
dlavery
|
My point. That would work about as well as Dave getting excited about virtual Krispy Kremes.
|

16-12-2007 19:16
Libby K
|
I don't think this is a hoax, although how relevant it will be to the 2008 game is yet to be seen. |
16-12-2007 19:17
Tom Bottiglieri
16-12-2007 19:18
fimmel|
i was thinking of an explanation the email not being the usual FIRST email blast. Perhaps, if the email's were indeed falsified, the perpetrator(s) searched the CD members list for those listing their team role as a mentor, and sent the supposed FIRST email to them (accounting for alternate contacts who have not received the email). The email inconsistency and the fact that i cannot navigate to the circuit board documentation using the FIRST site (I can only get to it through the URL in the picture) both keep me hesitant to totally believe this is the real deal. But then again, maybe it is.
|
16-12-2007 19:21
clydefrog88
hmmm, i couldn't think of any other way that some TIMS contacts would not recieve a supposed email blast.
16-12-2007 19:22
efoote868ah man. finals this week. Looks like i won't think at all about this... unless we get one. Then i'm going to be the one thinking all about this. ouch.
Well, it looks like the breadboard companion I soldered up for my digital electronics class, with its leds. Tell me its something more exciting though.
16-12-2007 19:23
Elgin Clock
|
Oh btw I believe the other end of the cable is an exact replica, so maybe thats how FIRST saved money on shipping these out, they just snipped these in half lol.
|
|
EDIT2: You know you are addicted to FIRST when you have been sitting here on the game hint page for 7 hours on a sunday...
|
|
wait a minute... Is that piece of paper in the picture smaller than 8x11? I hope so. Other wise those led's must be huge!
|
|
But how can it be an official email blast? I'm the alternate contact for my team and did not receive an email. I've received every other email that has been sent to frcteam@usfirst.org, but not this one
I want one of these things soooo badly now.... |
|
hmmm, i couldn't think of any other way that some TIMS contacts would not recieve a supposed email blast.
|
I don't know. It doesn't sound like the "level playing field advantage" that every team has had in the past if it is in fact part of the 2008 competition, but if not every team has gotten one or will not be getting one then maybe that explains it? idk.|
also...
Maybe the fact that only some people have gotten it has to do with their status? Who's paid for their events? |
16-12-2007 19:24
Libby K
Okay, so I already posted this but it's been zipped by...
also...
Maybe the fact that only some people have gotten it has to do with their status? Who's paid for their events?
16-12-2007 19:30
fimmel|
What if this item was only sent to certain teams? I don't know why that would be, but I remember our team signing up for experimenting with a board from National Instruments a few years ago. Maybe they selected teams who would receive this board this year by a lottery of past electrical based award winners & people who signed up to use that expierimental software as well back in the day?
AKA: Rookies need not apply. I don't know. It doesn't sound like the "level playing field advantage" that every team has had in the past if it is in fact part of the 2008 competition, but if not every team has gotten one or will not be getting one then maybe that explains it? idk.We got one of the 2008 boards btw. That could be a factor as well. Good thought Libby. Just one more thing to think about when teams say they haven't gotten theirs yet. |
16-12-2007 19:30
synth3tk
|
How do we know this is a hint for 2008?
Seriously. Knowing the GDC (or specifically, Dave...) also... Maybe the fact that only some people have gotten it has to do with their status? Who's paid for their events? |
16-12-2007 19:31
diesel2008 is going to be my second season on a FIRST team and will also only be the second year our school has a team. My question: Why take up 19+ pages on guesses?
Just to waste time?
or
Just for fun?
I don't see the reason for the guessing. We'll all find out what it is soon enough. Right?
16-12-2007 19:36
Elgin Clock
|
then how come my mom got an email and shes the alt contact for a rookie team?
|

|
2008 is going to be my second season on a FIRST team and will also only be the second year our school has a team. My question: Why take up 19+ pages on guesses?
Just to waste time? or Just for fun? I don't see the reason for the guessing. We'll all find out what it is soon enough. Right? ![]() |

16-12-2007 19:36
fimmel|
2008 is going to be my second season on a FIRST team and will also only be the second year our school has a team. My question: Why take up 19+ pages on guesses?
Just to waste time? or Just for fun? I don't see the reason for the guessing. We'll all find out what it is soon enough. Right? ![]() |
16-12-2007 19:44
synth3tk
|
2008 is going to be my second season on a FIRST team and will also only be the second year our school has a team. My question: Why take up 19+ pages on guesses?
Just to waste time? or Just for fun? I don't see the reason for the guessing. We'll all find out what it is soon enough. Right? ![]() |
16-12-2007 19:44
vivek16I think that dave might have influenced those people at the GDC a bit too much... 
-vivek
p.s. I still think that you kids should wait a couple of days before jumping to conclusions. Maybe the email list got cut off, maybe only some teams got the boards because of their location, maybe everyone will get the boards if you waited a couple of days.
16-12-2007 19:54
DonRotolo
|
2008 is going to be my second season on a FIRST team and will also only be the second year our school has a team. My question: Why take up 19+ pages on guesses?
Just to waste time? or Just for fun? I don't see the reason for the guessing. We'll all find out what it is soon enough. Right? ![]() |
16-12-2007 20:10
JaneYoung
|
I don't see the reason for the guessing. We'll all find out what it is soon enough. Right?
![]() |
16-12-2007 20:13
David BrinzaNone of the Team 980 contacts (Main, Alternate/Shipping) have received the e-mail or circuit board itself. We did have an issue with a payment from a non-profit org to FIRST not being credited because our team number wasn't on the check, but that was resolved last Tuesday.
We'll wait until next Wed. to contact FIRST. Perhaps by then, the "hoax" will have been uncovered or everyone officially registered will have received their "December gift".
Either way, this exercise shows just how hungry we all are for next season's challenge!!
16-12-2007 20:23
Big Kid|
2008 is going to be my second season on a FIRST team and will also only be the second year our school has a team. My question: Why take up 19+ pages on guesses?
Just to waste time? or Just for fun? I don't see the reason for the guessing. We'll all find out what it is soon enough. Right? ![]() |
16-12-2007 20:32
Libby K
|
Wrong, honestly i'm a rookie and the whole Jan 5th excitement has already gotten to me, I've spent idk 6-7 hrs on this board and I spent all morning trying to confirm this as an offical FIRST object, which right now is my decision that it is an offical object (after i think 3 DNS traces, and a few IP traces), and yea i've gone somewhat sleep less on thinking on what the game might be this year.
|
16-12-2007 20:37
Big Kid|
To all the rookies reading this:
Welcome! This is the beginning of the end. Game Hint Season. [credit to Michelle Celio for naming the next 2 weeks.] |
but im keeping my cool from jumping all over the place.
16-12-2007 20:46
Kristian Calhoun|
Welcome! This is the beginning of the end. Game Hint Season.
[credit to Michelle Celio for naming the next 2 weeks.] |
|
Originally Posted by **FIRST EMAIL**
Season's Greetings 2008 FRC Teams:
...game hint season of course... |
16-12-2007 20:49
Blue_MistOur team's paid for everything (I think), but it is a Sunday, so... that leads to more indecision. We haven't gotten either a board or an email, and we aren't rookies. And I don't think FIRST would do anything not to keep the field as level as possible. Will each team post whether they've gotten their's?
16-12-2007 20:52
vivek16lol
this is my FIRST "game hint season"... I'm pretty excited.
last year, I found out about the program so late that there was no build up. nobody know about it at all. rookie team. premeeting, workshop at the U of Minnesota, kickoff, boom...
-vivek
16-12-2007 20:54
ggoldmanI think i know who dave really is.....

Virtual DONUTS!!!
16-12-2007 21:11
Elgin Clock
16-12-2007 21:12
sishu7I've gotten a hint...
Can't comment on who said it, but I asked an insider "have you started building the field yet?"
I got the answer, "Actually, there isn't much to build..."
??? Any speculations combining this with the mysterious item received?
16-12-2007 21:16
sishu7C'mon... it's a decent hint (OK, not really). But it's something, right?
Where is all that FIRST creativity and speculation?
16-12-2007 21:17
Richard McClellan|
i was thinking of an explanation the email not being the usual FIRST email blast. Perhaps, if the email's were indeed falsified, the perpetrator(s) searched the CD members list for those listing their team role as a mentor, and sent the supposed FIRST email to them (accounting for alternate contacts who have not received the email). The email inconsistency and the fact that i cannot navigate to the circuit board documentation using the FIRST site (I can only get to it through the URL in the picture) both keep me hesitant to totally believe this is the real deal. But then again, maybe it is.
|
|
also...
Maybe the fact that only some people have gotten it has to do with their status? Who's paid for their events? |
16-12-2007 21:21
EricH
|
Nope, I'm the alternate contact and my team role is listed as "Mentor" and I didn't get the email. Also, I think it would be very difficult to extract email addresses from user profiles.
|
16-12-2007 21:22
sishu7|
I've gotten a hint...
Can't comment on who said it, but I asked an insider "have you started building the field yet?" I got the answer, "Actually, there isn't much to build..." ??? Any speculations combining this with the mysterious item received? |
16-12-2007 21:22
joeweberhttp://www.usfirst.org/uploadedFiles...%20_121007.pdf
Do you think it will use the back up battery , and will we still use the camera with it.
16-12-2007 21:25
synth3tk
|
I've gotten a hint...
Can't comment on who said it, but I asked an insider "have you started building the field yet?" I got the answer, "Actually, there isn't much to build..." ??? Any speculations combining this with the mysterious item received? |
16-12-2007 21:26
joewebercould the came peice have an area that you must trigger with the ir sensor, and it will change the lights from red to blue or blue to red? We may have to fight over getting to that spot to trigger it.
16-12-2007 21:41
wilmoair game anyone?
I like the laser-tag like game or the one where we tag bases with the ir, but very very very simple bots for that
16-12-2007 22:16
T3_1565I don't see a laser tag game, strictly based on the fact it would be boring for spectators to watch, I don't think it's a piece at all, but I do like the idea of it sending red / blue signals in auto so you having to find out which goal is yours
16-12-2007 22:27
synth3tk
It IS the game piece!!! First team to destroy it with it's IR beam wins. Bonus points to the first alliance who can clean up the tiny fragments. Good luck, volunteers. No special handling instructions will be sent. God Speed.
16-12-2007 22:32
Akash Rastogi|
It IS the game piece!!! First team to destroy it with it's IR beam wins. Bonus points to the first alliance who can clean up the tiny fragments. Good luck, volunteers. No special handling instructions will be sent. God Speed.
|
16-12-2007 22:34
vivek16|
It IS the game piece!!! First team to destroy it with it's IR beam wins. Bonus points to the first alliance who can clean up the tiny fragments. Good luck, volunteers. No special handling instructions will be sent. God Speed.
|
16-12-2007 23:01
legomaster3945im so happy yet sad
i have to wait another day for game hint because it was just anounced we have no school tommorow
but im happy cus of no school
now i get another day to ponder bout the hint for a whole day 
16-12-2007 23:03
blaxbb|
lol... wouldn't a concentrated flame thrower be considered an IR "beam"? sweet.
![]() |
16-12-2007 23:13
Chaos Marineso this is the offical game hint hmmm. What to do? what to do?? time to sound the alarms boys and girls its time to turn your motors on and get to thinkin how we are going to do this. Now that this is step 1, what will be step 2?...
17-12-2007 00:36
1359th ScalawagFrom what I read on the First website about it, it seems to be a remote-sensor. They say it can be used with universal remotes and such. First thing that comes to mind, is that you would install one of these in your garage door to be able to open it with a remote. Other possibilities could be televisions or whatever.
But a guess to what the game could be about: Each team's human player gets a remote which can only open one door (or possibly do some other things) And they could open and close that door for whatever strategic reasons... And that's as great of a guess you're ever gonna get out of me. 
17-12-2007 03:07
Frank NeupergerPerhaps game pieces will have IR emiters and the points earned depends on which peice you capture/deposit/neutralize. i.e. 4 different points values.. one for each code. This device can help you sort out or decide which game piece to go after.
17-12-2007 08:12
BanksKid|
We are given a rainbow ribbon wire for an infrared receiver, am i the only one who thinks the absence of ultra violet means something?
perhaps ultra violet is supposed to clue us to some sort of sun related theme or game piece. |
17-12-2007 08:25
JBotAlan
Since I was bored today by the snow day (and it's only 8:30 am...) I whipped up a driver for this board in case we end up needing to put it on the robot.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=60170
JBot
17-12-2007 08:27
T3_1565lucky you for snow days I can't even get on delphi for more than the time I'm on it right now lol. at least you can think about the game hint 
17-12-2007 08:39
wilsonmw04so from what i've read, either there is going to be a new way of controlling our robots this year or some sort of IR emitter will be part of the game. here's the questions i have:
1. Why would they send us "teaching instructions" if the IR frequencies are going to be controlled by the field?
2.If IR is going to be a field element, are we going to be use the remotes for practice?
3. Why hasn't my team received ours yet??
17-12-2007 08:46
Stephen Kowski|
OK, so since I was bored, and looking at the pic of the board for quite some time.. I decided to google some random things and see what I can find.
The order of the D codes above the LED's is D2, D5, D4, D3 & then D1. |
17-12-2007 08:48
T3_1565well I can try to answer that for you.
1.Teaching instruction can be so you can set-up your own field much like every other year (the KOP came with cathodes last year to set up your own field)
2. If the competition were, say, switching the goal colours during the match, you would have to have something to switch your own colour on your own field.
3. We haven't got it ethier 
17-12-2007 08:50
MrForbes
|
1. Why would they send us "teaching instructions" if the IR frequencies are going to be controlled by the field?
2.If IR is going to be a field element, are we going to be use the remotes for practice? 3. Why hasn't my team received ours yet?? |
17-12-2007 10:04
GaryVoshol
Our senior mentor forwarded the email; she didn't mention if she got a package.
17-12-2007 10:31
JesseKMy apologies if this has been previously stated, but I read through 11 pages of this thread and concluded that you guys talk ALOT.
Is this legit?
The unfathomable scenario of a late or forgotten part in the KOP would have been discovered probably in this exact time frame, probably just after they shipped some of the KOP boxes off to their coinciding Kickoff venues. At this point, someone at FIRST got the bright idea to turn this logistical blunder into one of the best-conceived baiting game hints ever.
However it's also interesting (but maybe coincidental) that this is released the weekend before the end of registration for new teams.
My hypothesis is that it's for 4 different light colors and will replace or enhance that hard-to-calibrate green light/CMUCam setup.
17-12-2007 10:36
Elgin Clock
|
I wouldn't think too hard on this, almost every electrical engineering software product just autonumbers depending on which Diode you place first. They aren't "D-codes" it is just how you represent Diode1 and Diode2 on a schematic.
|

17-12-2007 10:49
JBotAlan
|
By the way, what are the chances this intergrates with the USB chicklet?
Any takers on that theory, or is it even possible to use both simutaneously in a system of some sort? |
17-12-2007 10:57
pschre|
We are given a rainbow ribbon wire for an infrared receiver, am i the only one who thinks the absence of ultra violet means something?
perhaps ultra violet is supposed to clue us to some sort of sun related theme or game piece. |
17-12-2007 11:32
Kevin Sevcik
And now for some anti-speculation of sorts. In my opinion, this isn't going to be useful outside of autonomous mode. Or at least only marginally useful. Why? because if it was exceedingly useful outside of autonomous, it would have to be indicating something on the field that drivers and the audience couldn't see. And any scoring method or game influencing state that's invisible to the audience will drive them absolutely batty and quickly frustrate them. Similarly, I fully expect that whatever this indicates during autonomous mode will be readily apparent to spectators. And thus could be potentially determined by the robot by other means. It's just that those other means are probably going to be a lot more complex and less reliable.
This is all assuming, of course, that this is something we put on the robot to find out about something on the field.
17-12-2007 11:36
MrForbes
|
This is all assuming, of course, that this is something we put on the robot to find out about something on the field.
|
17-12-2007 11:46
EricH
17-12-2007 12:09
Elgin Clock
Anyone thought of the possibility of a IR sensor on the robot to see in darkened conditions?
This would cut some costs as far as field lighting is concerned as well. 
Rather than making a target of some kind brighter (ie: going from a painted green panel to a bright light), do the opposite, & make the field darker.
In the past a lot of technology that has been introduced in the kit is a low cost and/or stripped down version of what the big names in science & technology have used.
(oh.. i don't know.. like NASA for instance?)
On that note, do some googling of the word "QWIP" & "NASA".
Some interesting stuff happening there, even if it isn't directly tied in with what we will be doing with IR.
But who knows for sure?
I'll tell you who knows.
The Shadow knows! 
17-12-2007 12:09
rees2001
Strangely I got the e-mail for 1 of my 2 teams that I am the team leader for. I Used to get 2 of every e-mail now I only get 1. It may be because we still have to pay for the second team. I called our receiving department today to see if I got it & the FedEx truck hasn't come in yet. I'll let you know if & when it/they come in.
As for the uses... we'll see.
17-12-2007 12:40
T3_1565|
In my opinion, this isn't going to be useful outside of autonomous mode.
|
17-12-2007 12:47
Pavan Dave
|
I completely agree with this statement. I can see it being a replacement for the camera so that more and more teams can do auto mode (as far as I have heard this thing is easier to program) I can also see it being used for bonus points (end game).
If we end up having a game with invisible pieces or invisable zones or what-not, the crowd will not being nearly as "in to it" as they normally are. |
17-12-2007 12:51
JesseK|
I completely agree with this statement. I can see it being a replacement for the camera so that more and more teams can do auto mode (as far as I have heard this thing is easier to program) I can also see it being used for bonus points (end game).
If we end up having a game with invisible pieces or invisable zones or what-not, the crowd will not being nearly as "in to it" as they normally are. |
| This was discussed in about the first 11 pages. Consensus is that it is legit. The main reason for thinking it isn't is that some teams don't have theirs yet. |
17-12-2007 12:58
StorckyI'm not sure this is possible, but it would be pretty cool for spectators (not really drive teams) if the virtual pieces showed up on the video, but not on the field.
I'm not sure if we have a board yet or not. We should have a meeting tonight to find out.
|
Official word says that Israeli teams will only get this at the kickoff.....
![]() This should help you on the speculating side I guess... It can't be that critical to send it out early if the ~40 teams here don't et it till the kickoff... -Leav |

|
They might make a zone that's visible to the crowd but not visible to the players, or one that's very obscurred for the players (i.e. they can see where their robot is but not what it's picking up)
|
17-12-2007 13:22
Sparks333Looking at the picture, I think this may be a field element. As a sensor for the robot, is really is rather large and bulky - like the camera, but with twice as much space taken up for diagnostics. Secondly, I can't see this being used for homing of any kind whatsoever - there is only one sensor on it, and it doesn't give signal strength, just whether or not it sees something. That doesn't lend itself to differentiation, therefore, no homing. IR homing is a pain anyway, so no real loss. Just my $0.02
17-12-2007 13:53
Kevin Sevcik
|
Looking at the picture, I think this may be a field element. As a sensor for the robot, is really is rather large and bulky - like the camera, but with twice as much space taken up for diagnostics. Secondly, I can't see this being used for homing of any kind whatsoever - there is only one sensor on it, and it doesn't give signal strength, just whether or not it sees something. That doesn't lend itself to differentiation, therefore, no homing. IR homing is a pain anyway, so no real loss. Just my $0.02
|
17-12-2007 13:58
Ben Piecuch
|
In my opinion, this isn't going to be useful outside of autonomous mode. Or at least only marginally useful. Why? because if it was exceedingly useful outside of autonomous, it would have to be indicating something on the field that drivers and the audience couldn't see. And any scoring method or game influencing state that's invisible to the audience will drive them absolutely batty and quickly frustrate them. Similarly, I fully expect that whatever this indicates during autonomous mode will be readily apparent to spectators. And thus could be potentially determined by the robot by other means. It's just that those other means are probably going to be a lot more complex and less reliable.
|
17-12-2007 14:04
T3_1565
17-12-2007 14:18
Elgin Clock
17-12-2007 14:27
Ian Curtis
|
Don't laugh at me!
My hint is real, told to me by a our regional FIRST co-ordinator. If you don't believe me, fine... it's your loss. Either you'll eat your words when you see the field, or our co-ordinator is having a great laugh at my expense (which is not really like her...) |
17-12-2007 14:31
Billfred
|
It's like 3" by 1.5". I don't think it's really that big for putting on the robot. And if it's a field sensor, why hand it out? And where are the transmitters we'll be putting on the robots? Unless the challenge this year is for the robot to punch buttons on a universal remote. In a specific pattern..... Wait. Are we finally being tasked with the holy grail of robotics? Do we get to design robots that will program VCRs and thus end the scourge of blinking "12:00" LEDs in living rooms across the world?
|
17-12-2007 14:39
T3_1565
17-12-2007 15:33
JBotAlan
17-12-2007 15:39
Elgin Clock
|
That code was written by me. I don't even have a hardware part yet. I have received no extra hint, but merely followed the spec sheet assuming this goes on the robot.
The fact that code is being passed around doesn't prove anything, as it's not IFI/FIRST-official code. Just thought I'd better point that out. JBot |
17-12-2007 15:56
dlavery
|
In '04, our first year with a "targeted" Autonomous, the game was poorly designed ...
|
17-12-2007 16:02
Kevin Sevcik
|
I find it hard to believe that FIRST would go through the trouble of making this component, and then only using it for Autonomous. Here's a little history to prove this.
|
17-12-2007 16:04
T3_1565I agree once again (we sure think a-like) I can't see it being the only for the robot to work, I can see it help, and I can see it the most help in auto mode (or perhaps end game)
17-12-2007 16:11
www.divsys.comThe assemblies and function of this board are very real. I think this year will be a fun one for all the teams.
diversified systems
17-12-2007 16:16
AdamHeard
|
The assemblies and function of this board are very real. I think this year will be a fun one for all the teams.
diversified systems |
17-12-2007 16:22
njamietechI have a hard time believing this is legit.
The Dean Kamen post earlier was a little more real (yet still suspicious).
This user needs to be investigated on.
Can a mod do this please?
17-12-2007 16:24
JaneYoung
17-12-2007 16:26
www.divsys.comThis is Ben Wrightsman from diversifiedsystems. We manufactured the IR Sensor Boards at the beginning of this thread. We also produced the sensor boards last year, the YAW/Accel/Gear tooth sensors. Red was to spice things up a bit.
Just thought I would join up, and see all the hype on the "teaser" boards.
thanks,
BMW
17-12-2007 16:27
Elgin Clock

|
This year we are running all the boards in red, to spice things up a bit.
|

17-12-2007 16:36
dlavery
|
Even if they weren't, do you not believe the statement about it being a fun year?
And I think we already proved the board gift is real even IF www.divsys.com is not an "official" person with a CD account. There is no huge conspiracy between Joe Ross, Team 330, or any other people who have said they have gotten one. I would have thought by the 360+ posts in this thread so far, we would have all come to that concensus by now. Moving right along... ![]() |

17-12-2007 16:39
Libby K
|
Just because there are not less than 360 posts does not prove that Joe Ross is not part of a global conspiracy that anyone else might not be participating in. Or not.
![]() . |
17-12-2007 16:40
vivek16|
Just because there are not less than 360 posts does not prove that Joe Ross is not part of a global conspiracy that anyone else might not be participating in. Or not.
![]() . |
17-12-2007 16:41
T3_1565totally, and I haven't even read all 360+ posts.
I do find it odd that there has been a bunch of new members commenting on this thread though (like join CD to post on this thread)
I'm not saying there fakes but it is a little odd.. this part is definatly making for a cool year!!!!
EDIT:There was a thousand points between who I was agreeing with and my post it was Elgin I was responding to
17-12-2007 16:42
Elgin Clock
|
You realize if you keep messing with our heads, we're just going to stop paying attention to you? Then it's no fun for you.
Pssst....everyone...IGNORE DAVE! |
17-12-2007 16:48
www.divsys.com"Kind of cool that a board with Infrared technology on it would be colored red.
Very cool link of form & function in my opinion.
Kudos to who came up with that thought!"
I guess I can take credit for that, we were going to go with Colts blue, but didn't want to offend anyone. 
17-12-2007 16:51
EricH
|
Just because there are not less than 360 posts does not prove that Joe Ross is not part of a global conspiracy that anyone else might not be participating in. Or not.
![]() . |
17-12-2007 16:53
Kevin Sevcik
|
I guess I can take credit for that, we were going to go with Colts blue, but didn't want to offend anyone.
![]() |
17-12-2007 16:53
vivek16Ah yes, but it is still Cardinals red 
dissapointed, vivek
jk jk, I don't even watch football.
17-12-2007 16:54
d.courtney
I highly doubt that its a hoax and for mainly just one reason. If it was never in an email to the teams then sure I agree FIRST may play with us like this. But I question FIRST ever using its email blast as an accessory to a hoax. The email blasts frequently contain vital information for teams, and using it to play a prank on thousands of minds would lose credibility in its purpose.
Now as for what it is or what it will be used for, well I am content to wait till ours arrives in the mail before I think about it further. I hope is that its for a game piece that changes, not to be placed on the robot. The idea of game pieces changing throughout the game appeals to me.
17-12-2007 16:57
Libby K
I have a feeling only certain teams got it for a REASON.
I just want to know what that reason IS.
17-12-2007 17:00
Nuttyman54
|
I have a feeling only certain teams got it for a REASON.
I just want to know what that reason IS. |
17-12-2007 17:02
d.courtney
|
I have a feeling only certain teams got it for a REASON.
I just want to know what that reason IS. |
17-12-2007 17:04
Elgin Clock
|
Just because there are not less than 360 posts does not prove that Joe Ross is not part of a global conspiracy that anyone else might not be participating in. Or not.
![]() . |
17-12-2007 17:05
JBotAlan
Only the primary contact (I think) for 68 got the email--I saw it forwarded to my inbox from her. Now, I have no idea whether or not we received the part.
Will be able to tell in about 45 minutes if FedEx came through.
JBot
17-12-2007 17:05
JaneYoung
|
Our team got the email, I assumed every team got it. Are there many teams that haven't? (sorry I haven't gone through all the pages to read all the discussion, nor would I have the time).
Has someone been keeping track of who has received the email and tried to make a connection, whether it be number of teams per regional receiving the email or in direct relation to their team number? If only a select few teams are receiving this email, there MUST be a correlation, in which case I am willing to begin speculating why. |
17-12-2007 17:08
Kaushal.KThe game could also be something along the lines of King Of The Hill (robot has to "defend" a certain area from opposing robots and the "Hill" moves around every x seconds of game play...) although this theory does defeat the purpose of Autonomous, but maybe it could work if there were other ways to score points...
Edit: the "Hill" area would be defined by a certain IR frequency (which could light up one of the 4 LED's on the board)
Edit2: Team 1241 has not recieved either an email or the chip as of now (or atleast our Lead contact hasn't informed us about it.. yet...)
17-12-2007 17:10
artdutra04
|
Just because there are not less than 360 posts does not prove that Joe Ross is not part of a global conspiracy that anyone else might not be participating in. Or not.
![]() . |

17-12-2007 17:25
Milaki|
I think I'm going to need a 12 step program to help cure me from my Cryptic Dave Lavery Chief Delphi Post Analyzation Disorder I got goin' on here.
|
17-12-2007 17:33
T3_1565well for the record 1565 recieved the email and not the part, I was asuuming we didn't get it cause we were in the middle of 2ft of snow yesterday lol maybe we got it tonight though, I'll find out tomorrow morning when I ask my teacher
17-12-2007 17:41
Graham Donaldson|
Every one of the teams will be getting one of these. They were shipped out in batches. 1500parts and cables is no 8hour task.
![]() BMW |
|
How do we know this is a hint for 2008?
Seriously. Knowing the GDC (or specifically, Dave...) |
17-12-2007 17:58
Branden Ghena
I have read through all of the posts on here, but I couldn't find this...
Has any team apart from Team 330 actually received the IR Sensor yet?
17-12-2007 17:58
T3_1565well the email that was sent did say "...game hint season..."
17-12-2007 17:59
EricH
|
I have read through all of the posts on here, but I couldn't find this...
Has any team apart from Team 330 actually received the IR Sensor yet? ![]() |
17-12-2007 18:21
Ed Sparks
Team 34 got one today. I'm going to post a model in the FirstCadLibrary just for fun in a day or so.
17-12-2007 18:22
legomaster3945
17-12-2007 18:30
T3_1565true enough, but the chip did come with a piece of paper that said visit http://usfirst.org/decgift (or close to that)
We should really get a tally going of who got the email and who got there part
EDIT: For some reason I cannot start a new thread, so can someone else do it? and if Bradon sees this can you PM me as to why I cannot create a new thread??
17-12-2007 18:43
razor95kds766 has just received the chip (mailed to my brother who graduated from the team 3 years ago). it came in a package labeled "FRC game hint"
17-12-2007 18:45
synth3tk
It's on the first page, but the exact link it redirects to is http://www.usfirst.org/community/frc...t.aspx?id=7600
17-12-2007 18:55
T3_1565I thank you for the link blakcheez I just noticed something interesting!
http://www.usfirst.org/community/frc...t.aspx?id=6616 this is the 2008 email blast archieve! why isn't the game hint email here???
17-12-2007 19:01
synth3tk
That was brought up earlier. An answer is yet to be found, but so far this whole thing still seems legit. Could be dave working his defunct "magic" in the background...
17-12-2007 19:06
Nica F.
To follow up on the hint not really affecting anything outside of autonomous mode, I agree.
I really think that this hint won't affect the game for a lot of teams. If you think of Aim High and all the emphasis on the green light, many teams just used set angles and others positions where they knew they could make a goal.
For the Rack and Roll game the use of the green light again, could be avoided by teams who decided to just take a shot at dead reckoning. And others, didn't bother at an autonomous mode because the work on the camera would just be too much to handle.
Of course if the sensor, universal remote, or whatever crazy contraption that can help you find every goal imaginable would help during the game for certain advantages but in the end thats a lot of hype for something that only affects one aspect of the game (if it does happen to affect only autonomous mode that is).
17-12-2007 19:07
GaryVoshol
|
You realize if you keep messing with our heads, we're just going to stop paying attention to you? Then it's no fun for you.
Pssst....everyone...IGNORE DAVE! |
17-12-2007 19:07
T3_1565oh I didn't get a chance to read all 27 pages lol. It wouldn't surprise me if Dave told the webmaster of the FIRST site to hold out on putting that email in the archieve for a couples days so we mention it and say its a hoax when it isn't!!!!!
When will it end
When will my mind be a peace now that a hint has arisen???
oh well it's super fun who needs sleep anyways
17-12-2007 19:12
lackadaisy :)|
This is Ben Wrightsman from diversifiedsystems. We manufactured the IR Sensor Boards at the beginning of this thread. We also produce the sensor boards all you receive, the YAW/Accel/Gear tooth sensors. This year we are running all the boards in red, to spice things up a bit.
Just thought I would join up, and see all the hype on these new "teaser" boards. thanks, BMW |
17-12-2007 19:14
legomaster3945|
BMW? like the car? why doesn't he use his actual name? (or is this just the whole game hint thing getting to my head?)
btw, 341 got the email but hasn't gotten the sensor yet. |
Ben Wrightsman
17-12-2007 19:17
JBotAlan
|
We should really get a tally going of who got the email and who got there part
|
| EDIT: For some reason I cannot start a new thread, so can someone else do it? and if Bradon sees this can you PM me as to why I cannot create a new thread?? |
17-12-2007 19:20
Scott L.
I think a big reason behind releasing the game hints is to get us to think. So far we are thinking of solutions to possibly fictitious problems. This in my opinion is a great way to improve the knowledge of the participating members.
Just my opinion though
17-12-2007 19:21
T3_1565I did that (I'm not THAT new) it says I'm prohibitated from creating new threads. Not sure why....
17-12-2007 19:21
jerry wOK I'm tired of the confusion. Let get this straight.
We are finally getting the robot-thumb game that some of us have been waiting for!
Each alliance gets 2 remote controls. For example, the red alliance is handed 2 red remotes while on deck. They decide which 2 robots will hold the remotes. The first part of the game requires that a robot with the remote reach some spot on the field. This will be in front of the IR sensor. The sensor is housed on the field with only a small opening.
There the robot activates its mechanical thumb. It presses the button on the remote! The sensor sees the coded IR signal and activates one of the 4 outputs. this signal releases the first group of red batons. If the second red robot also got its remote aimed and detected, field releases the rest of the red batons.
After 45 seconds, all remaining batons are released. I assume that blue has broken thumbs.
Why a learning sensor? Because, some robot klutz will jam its thumb through the remote. Then the field crew must get a new remote out of the box and have the field learn the new code.
go teams!! may the best thumb win!!
jerry w
17-12-2007 19:25
T3_1565|
Without further ado:
Part 330 (Joe Ross) 1999 Hermosa Beach, CA 846 (SU 39) 2002 San Jose, CA 701 (Doug G) 2001 Fairfield, CA 237 (Elgin Clock) 1999 Watertown, CT 34 (Ed Sparks) 1997 Huntsville, AL 766 (razor95kds) 2002 Atherton, CA Blast only 1018 (Stu Bloom) 2003 Indianapolis, IN ? 2264 (vivek16) 2007 Plymouth, MN 2370 (fimmel) ? (TBA lists 0 as rookie year...) Rutland, VT 418 (JaneYoung) 2000 Austin, TX 1923 (Libby K) 2006 Plainsboro, NJ 217 (GeeForce) 1999 Sterling Heights, MI 1025 (GaryVoshol) ? (TBA lists 0 as rookie year) Ferndale, MI 340 or 424...not sure (rees2001) 340 and 424: 2000 Churchville, NY 190 (Nuttyman54) 1992 Worcester, MA 781 (d.courtney) 2002 Kincardine, ON (Canada) 1565 (T3_1565) 2005 Cambridge, ON (Canada) 68 (JBotAlan) 1998 Pontiac, MI |
17-12-2007 19:27
lukevanoort
|
I did that (I'm not THAT new) it says I'm prohibitated from creating new threads. Not sure why....
|
17-12-2007 19:28
synth3tk
|
You realize if you keep messing with our heads, we're just going to stop paying attention to you? Then it's no fun for you.
Pssst....everyone...IGNORE DAVE! |
|
Are you trying to make a thread in "Extra Discussion?" Try somewhere else, like the Rumor Mill.
|
17-12-2007 19:30
MarySheridanMy guess is that the sensor will be part of the field. If it is only able to receive data from up to a few feet away, how would the robot be able to receive it from across a field?
17-12-2007 19:36
T3_1565thanks everyone who helped with the thread problem (I was stupid and forgot that lol) I have the tally up in a different thread if you wish to add you team/name to the list!
17-12-2007 19:42
DonRotolo
|
it would have to be indicating something on the field that drivers and the audience couldn't see. And any scoring method or game influencing state that's invisible to the audience will drive them absolutely batty and quickly frustrate them.
|
|
true enough, but the chip did come with a piece of paper that said visit http://usfirst.org/decgift (or close to that)
|
17-12-2007 19:42
Nuttyman54
|
Without further ado:
Part 330 (Joe Ross) 1999 Hermosa Beach, CA 846 (SU 39) 2002 San Jose, CA 701 (Doug G) 2001 Fairfield, CA 237 (Elgin Clock) 1999 Watertown, CT 34 (Ed Sparks) 1997 Huntsville, AL 766 (razor95kds) 2002 Atherton, CA |
17-12-2007 19:43
EricH
|
I In this case, is it too much of a stretch to imagine that DEC (Digital Equipment Corp) offered to pay for these boards (with very generous donations from others), hence the name of the web page?
|
17-12-2007 19:49
JaneYoung
|
YIKES! 418 posts, this thread is moving far too fast. Is it bad that I have read every post?
|
17-12-2007 19:51
T3_1565|
That's not YIKES, that's cool.
And yay for reading all the posts, you get an extra chocolate covered cherry! |
17-12-2007 19:52
DonRotolo
Thanks Jane, one day I'll collect!
And EricH, I am so absorbed I have literally forgotten what month is it. D'oh!
Don
17-12-2007 19:52
Elgin Clock
|
thats the only thing I saw, yet AL is across the states and CT is that far plus north! hmmmmmmmmm
|

17-12-2007 20:02
lukevanoort
(I've read every post too, so I'm in the same boat) Actually, this thread might make an interesting mathematical study given that the rate of posting of certain ideas (hoax, virtual game piece, etc) seems (from what I remember of the previous 425 posts) almost like a damped sinusoidal pattern. I'd imagine that the period of the sine wave is probably somehow related to the number 15 (as in the default posts/page).
17-12-2007 20:08
RyanNHere is something that just popped in my head...
The autonomous game: There are n number of blue or red boxes with green stripes on the field. We still get cameras, but they are used to look for the boxes. There are 4 types of boxes:
0 point boxes, 2 point boxes, 4 point boxes, and 8 point boxes (made up values of course)
Each box has a specific IR frequency. What we must do is look for the boxes and decide which box is worth the most, pick it up, and place it in a sand box type pit in the center of the field (going off the hint of the new game doesn't require much field setup).
So... to make it simple: Autonomous mode starts, robots go out, find the box of the right color worth the most points, pick it up, place it in the pit.
Regular match: All the boxes look the same except some are red and some are blue (due to alliances). The robots must go up to the boxes, determine the value, and decide whether or not to score it.
EDIT: The reason I selected boxes is because we haven't had them in a llloooonnnnggg time...
17-12-2007 20:14
T3_1565I can see that for auto mode only I can see the IR getting shut off for tele mode (after auto points are tallied) and every "square" is now worth two points only, or something to that nature.
I like the idea though.. it would quite fun to play!
17-12-2007 20:14
synth3tk
|
YIKES! 418 posts, this thread is moving far too fast. Is it bad that I have read every post?
|
17-12-2007 20:18
synth3tk
|
It just means you are skilled at finding ways to waste inordinate amounts of your time for little to no gain.
(I've read every post too, so I'm in the same boat) Actually, this thread might make an interesting mathematical study given that the rate of posting of certain ideas (hoax, virtual game piece, etc) seems (from what I remember of the previous 425 posts) almost like a damped sinusoidal pattern. I'd imagine that the period of the sine wave is probably somehow related to the number 15 (as in the default posts/page). |
17-12-2007 20:20
sishu7|
Here is something that just popped in my head...
The autonomous game: There are n number of blue or red boxes with green stripes on the field. We still get cameras, but they are used to look for the boxes. There are 4 types of boxes: 0 point boxes, 2 point boxes, 4 point boxes, and 8 point boxes (made up values of course) Each box has a specific IR frequency. What we must do is look for the boxes and decide which box is worth the most, pick it up, and place it in a sand box type pit in the center of the field (going off the hint of the new game doesn't require much field setup). So... to make it simple: Autonomous mode starts, robots go out, find the box of the right color worth the most points, pick it up, place it in the pit. Regular match: All the boxes look the same except some are red and some are blue (due to alliances). The robots must go up to the boxes, determine the value, and decide whether or not to score it. EDIT: The reason I selected boxes is because we haven't had them in a llloooonnnnggg time... |
17-12-2007 20:22
Graham Donaldson|
It just means you are skilled at finding ways to waste inordinate amounts of your time for little to no gain.
(I've read every post too, so I'm in the same boat) Actually, this thread might make an interesting mathematical study given that the rate of posting of certain ideas (hoax, virtual game piece, etc) seems (from what I remember of the previous 425 posts) almost like a damped sinusoidal pattern. I'd imagine that the period of the sine wave is probably somehow related to the number 15 (as in the default posts/page). |
But the catch for me is, I've grown so numb to the conversation that I sorta skip over the posts re: whether or not this is a hoax (because we know it's not).
17-12-2007 20:26
T3_1565|
My post was edited... why? If someone pm's me and asks that I NOT include his or her name, I have every right not to do so!
|
17-12-2007 20:29
lukevanoort
|
And what the heck is a "damped sinusoidal pattern"? I'm fairly certain I've never heard of that before, yet I get the feeling that I will later this year (Hon. Precalc + Hon. Physics = a lot of math)
|

17-12-2007 20:32
Kevin Sevcik
|
It wouldn't be a stretch to put some kind of human-interpretable signal to indicate the state; for example, a colored light, or a numeric sign...
|
17-12-2007 20:34
mrmummert1610 so far has gotten the e-mail....i've made sure our lead teacher had the shipping address right
17-12-2007 21:00
Elgin Clock
|
I highly doubt that its a hoax and for mainly just one reason. If it was never in an email to the teams then sure I agree FIRST may play with us like this. But I question FIRST ever using its email blast as an accessory to a hoax. The email blasts frequently contain vital information for teams, and using it to play a prank on thousands of minds would lose credibility in its purpose.
|
17-12-2007 21:03
Billfred
|
Well, thus my point. A human interpretable signal would be nigh useless for robots in autonomous mode while an IR signal would be highly useful. But in tele-op, the human drivers could easily depend on the human interpretable signals instead of their robot sensing the IR signals. So the IR sensor would be potentially useful but no longer vitally necessary in tele-op.
|
17-12-2007 21:16
njamietech
17-12-2007 21:18
Branden Ghena
I think he just inverted the colors in MS Paint and then pasted in a banana, an allusion to something by Dlavery, I don't remember exactly what.
17-12-2007 21:20
EricH
|
I think he just inverted the colors in MS Paint and then pasted in a banana, an allusion to something by Dlavery, I don't remember exactly what.
|
17-12-2007 21:22
IndySam
17-12-2007 21:28
Joe G.
| how does that explain the banana? |
17-12-2007 22:22
www.divsys.com|
It may also be due to the month, or both together.
Someone, somewhere has to pay for everything. In this case, is it too much of a stretch to imagine that DEC (Digital Equipment Corp) offered to pay for these boards (with very generous donations from others), hence the name of the web page? |
17-12-2007 22:23
Chaos Marinehey people after looking at this picture and taking a look at the site it refers you to, this "IR learning Infared remote" makes me think about a year or two ago when Dave from Hot team started to talk about how he wants the robots to respond to more then just one color! this may be the remote they were looking for to do such a thing dont ya think??
17-12-2007 22:55
Ed Sparks
A model of the 2008 IR Board is posted in the FirstCadLibrary if you want to do some "virtual tinkering". 
17-12-2007 23:03
ahecht
|
hey people after looking at this picture and taking a look at the site it refers you to, this "IR learning Infared remote" makes me think about a year or two ago when Dave from Hot team started to talk about how he wants the robots to respond to more then just one color! this may be the remote they were looking for to do such a thing dont ya think??
|
17-12-2007 23:04
www.divsys.comEd/Anyone,
We can post the dimension CAD if it would benefit any of you.
17-12-2007 23:15
geeknerd99...I'm done following this thread... I have some hardcore sleeping to do...
17-12-2007 23:22
coolbotzHere's my take on this board. The board is used to switch modes (which color to look for or which part to manipulate). It is not used for navigation. The IR has proven to be too scattered for navigation. Each team can pick the particular IR codes with their own remote. But during competition each robot will need to respond to the same IR code for each mode. The field code be almost completely covered with multiple high output IR transmitters (spotlights) from many angles. Each robot only needs to see one valid code to give the FRC controller a 100mSec signal per the Official FRC spec sheet. Well how do the units get programmed at the competition you may ask. Since I don't have a decoder board I can speculate that the J2 header on the decoder board is a programming port or a remote "learn" switch. Another possibility is that the IR board has some preprogrammed IR signals that are not used by IR remotes. If you compare the FRC decoder board to the TinyIR2 board by TaunTek You will notice the extra 10k resistor (R4) That seems to go to the J2 header. Sounds like a weak pullup for an input to the PIC. Maybe someone can post a picture of the back of the board (unless it's a 4 layer) or better yet a schematic.
17-12-2007 23:24
Kevin Sevcik
|
What if the indication is pointed out of the view of the alliance stations?
|
17-12-2007 23:34
Stu Bloom
|
Ed/Anyone,
We can post the original CAD and specs if it would benefit any of you. |
17-12-2007 23:43
artdutra04
|
I'm curious too.
I'm also curious as to what you did to that image. |
|
I think he just inverted the colors in MS Paint and then pasted in a banana, an allusion to something by Dlavery, I don't remember exactly what.
|
18-12-2007 00:01
Jeff 801this may have been said but i dont want to read about 455 post but it might have to do with the team inductor light because this cable fits on 2 sets of the connectors if i am not mistaken
18-12-2007 00:11
EricH
|
this may have been said but i dont want to read about 455 post but it might have to do with the team inductor light because this cable fits on 2 sets of the connectors if i am not mistaken
|
18-12-2007 00:19
Joe Ross
|
Eww, MS Paint. Those are some lonely megabytes on my hard drive, as I've haven't used MS Paint in about two years. The real story behind this image goes even deeper...
As an avid fan of Numb3rs, I like to dig deeper into everyday objects to unravel our most perplexing mysteries. I first opened the photo in Photoshop CS2, and cropped out the parts I didn't want (Otherwise the filter algorithms might return false positives). Then to highlight the differences in the photo, I ran the photo through a heightened saturation filter, with an offset in the hue. From this, I upped the contrast by about 20%, which now provided an optimal base image to begin the preliminary filter algorithms. The first thing I would need to do was an inverse dithering and noise cancellation algorithm. Since the base photo was a JPEG image, there was noise in the photo from compressing it into a lossy file format; yet within this noise, there was also the image of the banana. Since the compression artifacts only effect the pixels around the source pixel, running the photo through these two algorithms simultaneously and integrating the results returned what I was looking for. I began to see the faint outline of a banana. However, it took several tries to get a good filter pass of the photo. Because these filters act upon the image using Erwin Schrödinger's theories of exponential decay of pixels in compressed photos, sometimes the banana is still alive in the output, others it's not. And there is no way you can predict or know which is which, except for running the algorithm a lot and relying on an interpretation and statistical analysis of the results. Using these results, I now needed another algorithm to be able to exactly detect the banana in the image, rather than rely on only human pattern-recognition skills, which in the hands of a creative person can result in one million different things visible in the same cloud in the sky. Obviously such a diverse range of output values given the extremely limited domain of input values in such a case would be extremely detrimental in our circumstance. After doing some research into pattern recognition algorithms, and more specifically banana-recognition algorithms, I discovered this site about banana and apple recognition. It was a gold mine of information, and even had working algorithms. Bingo. My hunch about the banana on the left side of the image paid off. The algorithm predicted that is was indeed a banana with 99.7% certainty, and with a very narrow Gaussian distribution of the output data. From there, I duplicated the layer and highlighted the banana in yellow to make it easier to see. But after looking back through my source website again, so much of the website seemed applicable to FIRST at the moment. So with that in mind, ...I've thus concluded that this year's game involves... apples and bananas! How 'bout them apples? ![]() |
18-12-2007 00:24
Jeff 801|
It isn't the diagnostic light. It's an IR receiver, programmable. Go read the thread. (You can skip the discussion of "hoax or not"--that's about 50 of the posts right there.)
|
18-12-2007 00:54
Elgin Clock
|
I had to compress the photo more then default to get under CD's 750KB limit. I'm pretty sure it was a pineapple before compression.
|
18-12-2007 03:39
BHOPmy conclusion is that the field will communicate to the robot, a solid, strong single signal that will probably change based on the state of the game(think offense, defense,ffa). IR is too shady try to communicate back and forth, but if you have enough power and transmitters i think the field could cut through anything, and render all auto focusing stuff useless. This could even be another lair of safety! I wonder why IR.......
18-12-2007 07:24
MikeDubreuil
18-12-2007 07:53
TaylorThe age-old debate of the sequence of circle/square/triangle game pieces will come to an end in 2008.
This year's game will feature all three.
Spheres, cubes, and tetrahedrons will be scattered in some way around the field, to be placed by the robots in corresponding bins. There will be casters on the bottom of the cube-bin and the tetra-bin, making them mobile around the field. The collection for the spheres will be much like the ground goals in Aim High, and they may be reintroduced to the arena by human players after having been scored. Much like Triple Play, a few of the game pieces, as well as the mobile bins, will have IR signals coming from them; the robots will have to differentiate between the different game pieces and place them in the correct bins during autonomous mode. Robots will score 2 points for each game piece placed in a bin, 5 points for each correct placement, and a 20-point autonomous bonus. There will be raised platforms on each half; at the end of the game, a multiplier will be awarded for each mobile bin atop the alliance's platform.
The name of the contest is Match Game (a not-so-hidden reference to Dave Lavery's childhood hero, Gene Rayburn).
18-12-2007 08:26
Ed Sparks
[quote=www.divsys.com;660698]Ed/Anyone,
We can post the original CAD and specs if it would benefit any of you.[/QUOTE
Yes! Please!
18-12-2007 08:35
Andy Baker
|
Ed/Anyone,
We can post the original CAD and specs if it would benefit any of you. |
18-12-2007 09:11
diesel
I know what i said earlier, but
My guess from reading this and other threads is that there will be different goals on the field and the goals will change value in points or will only be scorable at certain times. Once the robot is close to a goal it will be able to pick up the IR and decide weather or not to put the object in the goal.
This is simple and makes sense. Right
18-12-2007 09:13
whytheheckme
OOOH!!!!
Maybe my dream of a more field oriented positioning system is coming true!!!
Maybe, on the field, there are IR emitters all over the place, each giving off a different code. You can use the IR receiver to pick up these codes, and tell where your robot is.
YES
Jacob
18-12-2007 09:23
www.divsys.comEd, I just sent you part of the CAD. Tooling holes are noted for mounting. Can't say much more than that for now. 
thanks,
BMW
18-12-2007 09:36
Gene F
Maybe this is a suppliment for the colored beacons. They are mounted on the robot and interpreted by the video equipment. Video processing is done to place special icons over the robots on the screen indicating their alliance. Like is done is some sporting events.
This would make for a more TV friendly game.
18-12-2007 10:20
Graham Donaldson|
Eww, MS Paint. Those are some lonely megabytes on my hard drive, as I've haven't used MS Paint in about two years. The real story behind this image goes even deeper...
...[what I read] ...some weird photoshop stuff I don't understand...more weird photoshop stuff I don't understand... [/what I read] ...I've thus concluded that this year's game involves... apples and bananas! How 'bout them apples? ![]() |
18-12-2007 11:56
Elgin Clock
|
Ed, I just sent you part of the CAD. Tooling holes are noted for mounting. Can't say much more than that for now.
![]() thanks, BMW |

18-12-2007 12:00
MrForbes
|
Ben,
Welcome to ChiefDelphi.com. Get ready for the craziness. AB |
18-12-2007 12:08
Tottanka
|
dang, someone else beat me to it! this is at the top of the list of random quotes already
![]() |
18-12-2007 12:28
synth3tk
|
Maybe this is a suppliment for the colored beacons. They are mounted on the robot and interpreted by the video equipment. Video processing is done to place special icons over the robots on the screen indicating their alliance. Like is done is some sporting events.
This would make for a more TV friendly game. |
18-12-2007 13:17
Scott L.My equipment (computers, switches, routers, scan converter, monitors, KVM switch, capture card, connecting cables, audio mixer, mics, and domain name) cost about $1200 or so.
I didn't buy the cameras, but for a professional one they start at about $700 for a good one.
As for software windows 2003 includes the media server, and the encoder is free to download from the microsoft web site. Also Ubuntu Linux and VLC can be used to web cast.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...light=web+cast
18-12-2007 13:54
T3_1565|
Ed, I just sent you part of the CAD. Tooling holes are noted for mounting. Can't say much more than that for now.
![]() thanks, BMW |
We are going to end up analysing your quotes soon like we do to dave if your not careful lol
18-12-2007 14:14
Graham Donaldson|
Maybe this is a suppliment for the colored beacons. They are mounted on the robot and interpreted by the video equipment. Video processing is done to place special icons over the robots on the screen indicating their alliance. Like is done is some sporting events.
This would make for a more TV friendly game. |
18-12-2007 14:29
Tottanka
|
Seems like everyone is forgetting that these are IR receivers as opposed to transmitters. They can only read signals, not send them.
|
18-12-2007 14:40
Gene F
|
Seems like everyone is forgetting that these are IR receivers as opposed to transmitters. They can only read signals, not send them.
|
18-12-2007 14:43
dieselJust saw ours but our coach/mentor/teacher won't let me look at it.
It's all lot smaller than I thought.
18-12-2007 17:24
Kaushal.KTeam 1241 has the part (tuesday) time to get cracking.. =)
18-12-2007 17:46
Graham DonaldsonHope we got ours...i don't know...we didn't have it as of 10:40 this morning when I was in engineering...Now i wish i had stayed after school...
18-12-2007 18:01
Aren_Hill
1625 has received both the part and the email. we got 2 pieces of paper in the package though same thing
18-12-2007 18:03
RyanNWe received our today. Here are some pictures from my phone and a video will follow once it processes on youtube.com.





18-12-2007 18:32
vivek16@ryanN Yeah pretty much ours. I was going to upload pics but it is pretty good in what you have.
well I hooked it up to a 9 volt and the error light flashed once
umm... my dog ate it
. Ok it does that consistently so i am just going to assume that it just needs to be programmed.
-vivek
18-12-2007 19:11
RyanNThe back of the board is flat with no components and a few traces. I would put some space between it and a piece of metal. Vivek, have you tried to program it? You need to hold down the tact button before you connect the power to enter programming mode. Continue holding the button down for 2 seconds then release the button while keeping the power on. Then the CMD0 light will come on. Press down a button on the remote control you want to use until the CMD0 light flashes off, then on and turns off again illuminating the next LED (CMD1). Here is the video of ours working. It's really easy to setup.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=G9U7flxTDes
18-12-2007 19:16
vivek16|
The back of the board is flat with no components and a few traces. I would put some space between it and a piece of metal. Vivek, have you tried to program it? You need to hold down the tact button before you connect the power to enter programming mode. Continue holding the button down for 2 seconds then release the button while keeping the power on. Then the CMD0 light will come on. Press down a button on the remote control you want to use until the CMD0 light flashes off, then on and turns off again illuminating the next LED (CMD1). Here is the video of ours working. It's really easy setup.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=G9U7flxTDes |

18-12-2007 19:22
RyanN|
no, I have not tried to program it. Thanks for the information
![]() thanks, vivek |
18-12-2007 20:52
popo308we received ours today (tues) i have not had a chance to mess with it though so hopefully this weekend or sometime soon i can tinker a bit and try to get it working
18-12-2007 21:13
billbo911If someone with a board and access to a multi-meter can do some checking, I would appreciate it. Primarily I would like to know if the White header plug has a pin connected to the same pin on the micro that the Programming button connects to.
18-12-2007 21:17
Team 1511, Rolling Thunder, in Rochester NY has received its sensor
It did indeed come in a package labeled as the hint, in case anyone still has doubts about that. Got a chance to play with it tonight and got it to receive a signal from a remote. Had to strip the ribbon cable end so we could hook it to power, but it works! Haven't tested range, but up close it works just like its supposed to.
18-12-2007 21:48
Elgin Clock
18-12-2007 22:04
As i just finished reading through all the other posts I have a question for Dean Kamen, Dave Lavery, or our new sponsor diversified Systems (or any other official FIRST people): since it IS the season for gifts are there any other nice little hints you would like to give to the good little boys and girls who spend so much time theorizing and reading this thread? If there is a place with divsys's CAD file for the board I could use a link. Thanks and happy holidays!
18-12-2007 22:44
MilakiFor the chip is FIRST sending out backups to teams or just one? 
18-12-2007 22:50
DonRotolo
|
The IR sensor component was donated by Vishay. We (diversifiedsystems) provided the layout, engineering, bare circuit boards, all the remainder of the components, and assembled it all. This was part of our sponsorship to FIRST, and specifically to all the teams. We have some other cool things coming....
BMW AKA Ben Michael Wrightsman for those that asked. |
18-12-2007 22:52
Jim EMaybe since every team is going to program this circuit with their own remote, perhaps the PIC contains enough RAM to download the settings to the camera for detecting different colors of goal lights.
It would be up to the driver team to bring their robot close enough to the driver station to control the PIC with the team's remote to detect the ever-changing goal light.
18-12-2007 22:53
Akash Rastogi
18-12-2007 23:04
Mark McLeod
Tried out ours tonight, but it doesn't appear to be working as expected.
It seems to learn about four different remotes (found one it didn't acknowledge at all and another it objected to via the error LED), but after going through the learning sequence it won't respond to any of them in any way.
BTW
One of the traces from the unmarked white connector appears to go to the learn button.
18-12-2007 23:52
Eugene Fang
18-12-2007 23:53
Larry Lewis
|
Tried out ours tonight, but it doesn't appear to be working as expected.
It seems to learn about four different remotes (found one it didn't acknowledge at all and another it objected to via the error LED), but after going through the learning sequence it won't respond to any of them in any way. BTW One of the traces from the unmarked white connector appears to go to the learn button. |
19-12-2007 00:00
EricH
|
3 days early what? was an 'official clue' supposed to come out today?
|
19-12-2007 00:57
billbo911|
BTW
One of the traces from the unmarked white connector appears to go to the learn button. |
19-12-2007 01:42
TurtlecoachThis has been an impressive thread with all the speculation as to how this IR board will be used. Here is my two cents. Think about what FIRST has always done...they want the teams to develop solutions to problems. NASA eventually wants to put up bases on the Moon & Mars. You need robots working together to make that happen. I bet that the KOP will contain an IR transmitter that will mount on the robot along with this receiver. Robots on the field are going to have to work together to accomplish a task such as a coordinated lift. Four outputs - UP, DOWN, FORWARD, BACK come to mind. The instructions for setting up with a TV remote are so you can test the bot before competition. The white plug would be for regional programming when you bring the robot up for inspection so everyone has the same "learned" program. The LED's on the board would be for diagnostics when checking the bot out during the build and confirming the programming at the regionals. Most likely wrong, but its a thought.
19-12-2007 04:38
keen101Umm.... I'm not exactly sure which wires do what. which leads do you have to strip back and apply power?
From the manual I think it's "saying" Brown and Red are + Posotive, and Orange, Yellow are - Negative
Bonus question: Does anyone have any ideas as to hook this up to our robot as a sensor for "pre-testing"? TTL port?
or just apply power, and then wire 5 - 8 to spare PWM cables. To the white wires?
19-12-2007 05:20
keen101Never mind. I couldn't resist.
OK, so I found an old 2pin sensor (female) cable end, and connected it to the two lower right hand pins. The one labeled "2"(RED?), and the one nest to it which I am assuming is 4 (Yellow?)
Anyway it worked. I was able to program code 1 with a button on my cheap DVD remote.
As for the Sensor part.... I will assume you connect them to old PWM cables. However I could be wrong, so I'll wait to hear otherwise.
19-12-2007 07:59
Bill Moore|
Tried out ours tonight, but it doesn't appear to be working as expected.
It seems to learn about four different remotes (found one it didn't acknowledge at all and another it objected to via the error LED), but after going through the learning sequence it won't respond to any of them in any way. BTW One of the traces from the unmarked white connector appears to go to the learn button. |
19-12-2007 08:20
Bill Moore|
This has been an impressive thread with all the speculation as to how this IR board will be used. Here is my two cents. Think about what FIRST has always done...they want the teams to develop solutions to problems. NASA eventually wants to put up bases on the Moon & Mars. You need robots working together to make that happen. I bet that the KOP will contain an IR transmitter that will mount on the robot along with this receiver. Robots on the field are going to have to work together to accomplish a task such as a coordinated lift. Four outputs - UP, DOWN, FORWARD, BACK come to mind. The instructions for setting up with a TV remote are so you can test the bot before competition. The white plug would be for regional programming when you bring the robot up for inspection so everyone has the same "learned" program. The LED's on the board would be for diagnostics when checking the bot out during the build and confirming the programming at the regionals. Most likely wrong, but its a thought.
|
19-12-2007 09:16
Tottanka
|
Earlier this fall, as FIRST was releasing information, I was surprised at the number of times they addressed "collaboration". Taking your NASA idea to a more present engineering achievement, consider the International Space Station. This is an Engineering task that must be coordinated between teams of engineers very distant from each other, yet the separate components must match up in space, or their efforts will be wasted.
BIG WHAT IF . . . What if FIRST provided a docking ring and collar system in the KOP, and teams had to build both a drive system and an actuator assembly that could be separated by using this docking system. Then at competitions, teams would not only play together, but would have to use the drive from one team with the actuator from another. You could have 2 robots vs 2 robots matches and increase each alliance to 4 teams (8 teams per match). Teams would only play with half their robot, and they could mix and match among the alliance to get the best fit of robots. It would be very difficult, but by encouraging collaboration, it would mimic a current engineering task. |
19-12-2007 12:00
TurtlecoachI'm thinking more along the lines of one bot synching operations with another. Here is the scenerio - Two aliance bots approach object to move together, 1st bot would be in Master mode, 2nd bot would be in Slave mode. Both bots go to pick up / move object and Master bot sends a sync signal to Slave bot via IR so both lift mechanisms operate simultaneously. This way you can get coordinated lifts, provided of course that the lift mechanisms operate at the same rate. In a similar manner both bots could be synched to move at the same time or operate two seperate field targets at the same instant to open gates, doors, etc... This would be slick and make the collaboration hints valid. Remember what FIRST was trying to teach in 2007. What will your opponent / alliance member build and how can you accomodate / defend against it.
19-12-2007 12:05
JaneYoung
19-12-2007 12:28
jerry wi am not impressed.!
you have all missed the most obvious clues with this board. you keep trying to fasten it to the robot.
clues
1. the power available from a robot controller is +7.2 and +5 volts.
the power for a field component is usually a 12 volt battery.
this board runs on 5 volts but requires between 7 and 15 volts!!
2. the ribbion cable is not configured anywhere like a digital connection on the controller.
3. the learning of a remote allows the newton field to use differrent codes from the curie field.
if each team had to learn an alliance partner code it would take too much time between matches.
4. there are 4 outputs from the board. there are 4 corners on the field. 2 red remotes and 2 blue remotes would allow teams to trigger 4 release mecanisms.
we have cmu-cam to collect data. now we will have IR remotes on the robot to send data to the field.!!
please put this board on the field where it belongs.
jerry w
19-12-2007 12:48
Pavan Dave
|
OOOH!!!!
Maybe my dream of a more field oriented positioning system is coming true!!! Maybe, on the field, there are IR emitters all over the place, each giving off a different code. You can use the IR receiver to pick up these codes, and tell where your robot is. YES Jacob |
19-12-2007 12:55
billbo911|
i am not impressed.!
you have all missed the most obvious clues with this board. you keep trying to fasten it to the robot. clues 1. the power available from a robot controller is +7.2 and +5 volts. the power for a field component is usually a 12 volt battery. this board runs on 5 volts but requires between 7 and 15 volts!! |
|
2. the ribbon cable is not configured anywhere like a digital connection on the controller.
|
|
3. the learning of a remote allows the newton field to use different codes from the curie field.
if each team had to learn an alliance partner code it would take too much time between matches. 4. there are 4 outputs from the board. there are 4 corners on the field. 2 red remotes and 2 blue remotes would allow teams to trigger 4 release mechanisms. we have cmu-cam to collect data. now we will have IR remotes on the robot to send data to the field.!! please put this board on the field where it belongs. jerry w |
19-12-2007 13:12
T3_1565|
So I guess the 12vdc battery on the robots is just there for counter balance?
|

19-12-2007 13:21
billbo911|
Uhhh the 12vdc battery connects to the RC board, which converts any digital output to 5vdc. I don't think the camera would run very well with 12vdc running through it!!
![]() |
19-12-2007 13:21
Tom BottiglieriI am very interested in the white jack labeled 'J2'. I've mapped where the pins go.
J2 PIC Description 1 4 RA5/MCLR/VPP 2 14 VDD 3 5 VSS 4 13 RB7/PGD/T1OSI 5 12 RB6/PGC/T1OSO/T1CKI 6 X X
19-12-2007 13:23
billbo911|
I am very interested in the white jack labeled 'J2'. I've mapped where the pins go.
Code:
J2 PIC Description 1 4 RA5/MCLR/VPP 2 14 VDD 3 5 VSS 4 13 RB7/PGD/T1OSI 5 12 RB6/PGC/T1OSO/T1CKI 6 X X |
19-12-2007 13:24
T3_1565|
My point is, this device can quite easily be used on the robot, as well as being part of the field.
|
19-12-2007 13:31
AdamHeard
|
So I guess the 12vdc battery on the robots is just there for counter balance?
If you noticed by looking at the picture of the board, the connector on one end of the cable connects to the board at the matching plug. The other end of the cable is not terminated, allowing us to come up with our own connections designs to the RC. The rest of these speculations are distinctly possible. I really would love to see more ideas on this thread about this boards possible uses, as long as they make sense based on what we know already. |
19-12-2007 13:37
Daniel_LaFleurOK. I'll speculate as to what I believe this will be used for.
Many of us are assuming that there will be an autonomous mode because there has been an autonomous mode for the last few years. This year, I believe that instead of an autonomous mode there will be a timeframe (say 45 of the 135 seconds in a match) in which the drivers line of sight to the robot will be blocked (some sort of removable/droppable screen) and that the driver will only be able to navigate via a IR sensor grid, with 1 emitter in each corner of the field.
Since the viewing angle is only 60 degrees (+/- 30 degrees) there would be no overlap, and since the signal strength is proportional to how 'on axis' you are it would be fairly easy to navigate to a spot on the field.
Thoughts?
.
19-12-2007 13:42
Nuttyman54
|
Since the viewing angle is only 60 degrees (+/- 30 degrees) there would be no overlap, and since the signal strength is proportional to how 'on axis' you are it would be fairly easy to navigate to a spot on the field.
Thoughts? . |
19-12-2007 14:04
Daniel_LaFleurSince I don't have access to the board, I cannot test it, but my assumption (yeah I know) was that out0-3 were analog outputs.
Name Pin # Signal Description +VIN 1, 2 Positive power supply voltage input. Voltage should be in the range 7-15 volts DC. Your power supply will have to be independent, for example, a 6 x AA battery pack, 9V battery, 12V battery, bench top supply, or other. GND 3, 4 Negative power supply voltage input OUT2 5 Output signal associated with third trained button OUT1 6 Output signal associated with second trained button OUT3 7 Output signal associated with fourth trained button OUT0 8 Output signal associated with first trained button NC 9, 10 Unused
19-12-2007 14:12
billbo911|
but my assumption (yeah I know) was that out0-3 were analog outputs.
|
19-12-2007 14:21
coolbotzPin description on J2 is a classic PIC -ICSP programming port.
19-12-2007 15:02
Daniel_LaFleur|
Sorry Bro,
According to the documentation available from FIRST: "Each output provides a 100 mSec high (5V) pulse when its command is recognized." No analog here, just one discrete output per input. Either High or Low. Don't worry, I don't take the "me" part of your assumption personal. ![]() |
.
19-12-2007 16:29
Richard McClellan|
I'm no electronics expert, but I think running this off of the 12V battery will all the crazy loads on it would be bad (but then again.... the RC is off the 12V...). Is this true?
|
19-12-2007 16:31
njamietechPersonally I don't think it will be part of the robot.
However I do like some of the Ideas that have been presented. Should make for an interesting year.
16 days 18 hours and 28 minutes till kickoff.
19-12-2007 17:01
jerry w|
So I guess the 12vdc battery on the robots is just there for counter balance?
|
19-12-2007 17:14
Elgin Clock
|
we can use any old handheld remote for now. but we will have something else in the kit of parts.
|

19-12-2007 17:21
billbo911|
actually our team did use the battery that way one year.
Come on Mr. Bill. You have seen some of the things first has done in the past. Maybe they forgot that the 3 pin connector for a digital input has +5 volts on one of the pins. So, why connect to and draw power from the breaker panel to operate this board? Did they need a 5 volt regulator on the board and on the robot controller? I think you are looking at only half of the system here. for IR communication, the robot will have a transmitter. the IR receiver is the half that is placed on the field. we can use any old handheld remote for now. but we will have something else in the kit of parts. jerry w |
| "Assuming a 12VDC supply," |
|
"Voltage should be in the range 7-15 volts DC. Your power supply will have to be independent, for example, a 6 x AA battery pack, 9V battery, 12V battery....." |
19-12-2007 17:25
Rich Kressly
So, I was thinking. Could it be possible even though all rational people might say this game will never happen ... Does IR work underwater? Or more importantly, through an air-water interface? ... sigh ... I was going to sleep over the holidays, now I'm wrapped up in the mayhem too ... 
19-12-2007 17:40
Daniel_LaFleur|
So, I was thinking. Could it be possible even though all rational people might say this game will never happen ... Does IR work underwater? Or more importantly, through an air-water interface? ... sigh ... I was going to sleep over the holidays, now I'm wrapped up in the mayhem too ...
![]() |
19-12-2007 18:03
lukevanoort
I know pretty much for certain we'll get some IR emitters in the kit. Anyone ever stalled a Fisher-Price?
(sorry, couldn't resist)
19-12-2007 18:06
Richard Wallace
|
Light does pass through the air water barrier but it bends as it does so.
|
19-12-2007 18:18
Daniel_LaFleur|
Water's refractive index is about 4/3. Light originating on the water side will be partially reflected (back into the water) and partially refracted (into the air) at angles given by Snell's Law. Light originating in the water and incident on the surface at an angle greater than about 49 degrees will be totally reflected back into the water.
So some underwater positions will permit better transmission of IR than others. |
19-12-2007 18:46
vivek16
19-12-2007 19:35
Mark McLeod
|
With the speculation about RoboLaser Tag, could the response be to shut down for a period after receiving a signal? Is your sensor still unresponsive?
|
19-12-2007 21:29
ZachKahn
IR = International Relations? Think about it.
I definitely think the wire is the hint and the sensor is a normal component. The wires are too small to be soldered. The connector wires are a rainbow. Let's follow that rainbow to the pot of gold!!!
*note* A rainbow is in an arc... could this mean a trajectory of a flying object or a round game piece.
19-12-2007 22:03
Ryan OWhat about having one "control" bot that sends a signal to the other alliance bots, like something to program them or tell them about a certain element on the field?
Even if we haven't got the transmitter yet, remember that last year's hint was only a very small PART of the scoring system...
By the way, we are a team in Southern NH, and we got it today. I don't know about the e-mail, but as far as I can tell it's legit.
19-12-2007 22:03
Kaushal.K|
IR = International Relations? Think about it.
I definitely think the wire is the hint and the sensor is a normal component. The wires are too small to be soldered. The connector wires are a rainbow. Let's follow that rainbow to the pot of gold!!! *note* A rainbow is in an arc... could this mean a trajectory of a flying object or a round game piece. |
19-12-2007 22:05
artdutra04
|
IR = International Relations? Think about it.
I definitely think the wire is the hint and the sensor is a normal component. The wires are too small to be soldered. The connector wires are a rainbow. Let's follow that rainbow to the pot of gold!!! *note* A rainbow is in an arc... could this mean a trajectory of a flying object or a round game piece. |
19-12-2007 22:16
T3_1565but FIRST is sneaky like that to make you think "hey this wire is a symbol, and then go wait no it isn't" and then BAM it is!
20-12-2007 00:37
keen101Just thought I'd let everyone know that after having the board for 1 day... It broke today.
But It's ok, seems that the 5v voltage regulator died. I replaced it, and now it works fine again.
So, if anyone's boards die... check the 5v regulator.
20-12-2007 00:38
sishu7Has anyone in the Pacific Northwest received this "gift?" No one from the teams I have spoken to has, and our team certainly has not.
20-12-2007 01:52
Anamn3sisMy team got it this morning, I'll post hi-res photos for everyone tomorrow when I get a chance to look at it again, and thanks for all the info in this thread 
20-12-2007 02:25
AndyB
We got our chip today and were playing with it. We found it had around a 50' range for us. But with a lens, the range can be extended to well across the length of the playing field. If they will be using the the board as-is, then I don't foresee a target past midfield if a driver/human player were to be using a remote to somehow effect the game.
20-12-2007 02:37
Aren_Hill
AndyB, was that 50ft range with or without the lense. And how did you have that lense setup/what type of lense
20-12-2007 03:42
AndyB
|
AndyB, was that 50ft range with or without the lense. And how did you have that lense setup/what type of lense
|
20-12-2007 06:55
GaryVoshol
|
So, I was thinking. Could it be possible even though all rational people might say this game will never happen ... Does IR work underwater? Or more importantly, through an air-water interface? ... sigh ... I was going to sleep over the holidays, now I'm wrapped up in the mayhem too ...
![]() |
|
Light does pass through the air water barrier but it bends as it does so.
|
20-12-2007 07:56
Daniel_LaFleur|
We got our chip today and were playing with it. We found it had around a 50' range for us. But with a lens, the range can be extended to well across the length of the playing field. If they will be using the the board as-is, then I don't foresee a target past midfield if a driver/human player were to be using a remote to somehow effect the game.
|
20-12-2007 08:46
Alan Anderson
|
The problem with using a lens is that it has a focal length. The further away from that length you are (both closer or farther) the more defocused you get. Any single lens that gives you IR visability across the field will be out of focus up close (and may not be detectable). A zoom lens coupled with an PID circuit could allow you to focus at any length.
|
20-12-2007 08:51
team1203 4life|
Without further ado:
Part 330 (Joe Ross) 1999 Hermosa Beach, CA 846 (SU 39) 2002 San Jose, CA 701 (Doug G) 2001 Fairfield, CA 237 (Elgin Clock) 1999 Watertown, CT 34 (Ed Sparks) 1997 Huntsville, AL 766 (razor95kds) 2002 Atherton, CA Blast only 1018 (Stu Bloom) 2003 Indianapolis, IN ? 2264 (vivek16) 2007 Plymouth, MN 2370 (fimmel) ? (TBA lists 0 as rookie year...) Rutland, VT 418 (JaneYoung) 2000 Austin, TX 1923 (Libby K) 2006 Plainsboro, NJ 217 (GeeForce) 1999 Sterling Heights, MI 1025 (GaryVoshol) ? (TBA lists 0 as rookie year) Ferndale, MI 340 or 424...not sure (rees2001) 340 and 424: 2000 Churchville, NY 190 (Nuttyman54) 1992 Worcester, MA 781 (d.courtney) 2002 Kincardine, ON (Canada) 1565 (T3_1565) 2005 Cambridge, ON (Canada) 68 (JBotAlan) 1998 Pontiac, MI Wow...that was a lot of work... No high-number teams have received their part yet--no team # > 1000. Other than that I see little correlation. Analyze away. I'm done with that. At the top of the page, there is a link labeled "Chief Delphi"--it's at the beginning of "Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com website > Extra Discussion..." Click it and pick the correct forum. Then, click the New Thread button at the top, and post away. JBot |
20-12-2007 09:22
Elgin Clock
20-12-2007 10:00
Daniel_LaFleur|
This isn't a camera. Being "in focus" is irrelevant. What an extra lens can provide here is a combination of directivity and light-collecting power. For this application, non-imaging optics are fine. It's the size of the lens that matters most, and the focal length is (to a point) unimportant.
|
20-12-2007 10:02
Beth Sweet
Ok folks, I have it on very good authority how this game piece is going to be used. Please pay close attention to the directions, otherwise, yours will not work properly:
1: You're going to need 2 blank sheets of white paper and a pencil. A pen will not do.
2: You need to be in a location where you will not be interrupted. You will have very limited time once you start.
3: Sit down at a large table, you will need to spread out
4: Take your game piece sent to you in the mail. Place the piece front side up on the table, and drape the first piece of paper over it like a tablecloth
5: Making sure that the paper stays in place, take your pencil and holding it horizontally, rub it across the paper back and forth from one side of the board to the other until you get a full scale drawing
6: Turn the board piece upside down and do the same with the other piece of paper
7: Now this step is very important. Take your 2 sheets of paper and 2 pieces of tape, and hang the papers on your door or on your cubicle. You now have artwork to remind you of all of the fun you had anticipating the 2008 game.
Enjoy the water game! 
PS. What did you think you were going to get from the non-techy!?
20-12-2007 10:57
Gamer930
|
Ok folks, I have it on very good authority how this game piece is going to be used. Please pay close attention to the directions, otherwise, yours will not work properly:
1: You're going to need 2 blank sheets of white paper and a pencil. A pen will not do. 2: You need to be in a location where you will not be interrupted. You will have very limited time once you start. 3: Sit down at a large table, you will need to spread out 4: Take your game piece sent to you in the mail. Place the piece front side up on the table, and drape the first piece of paper over it like a tablecloth 5: Making sure that the paper stays in place, take your pencil and holding it horizontally, rub it across the paper back and forth from one side of the board to the other until you get a full scale drawing 6: Turn the board piece upside down and do the same with the other piece of paper 7: Now this step is very important. Take your 2 sheets of paper and 2 pieces of tape, and hang the papers on your door or on your cubicle. You now have artwork to remind you of all of the fun you had anticipating the 2008 game. Enjoy the water game! ![]() PS. What did you think you were going to get from the non-techy!? |
20-12-2007 10:59
Alan Anderson
|
Being perfectly 'in focus' is not important, you are correct. But being out of focus will lessen the energy recieved by the sensor, and as such will make it less sensitive (requireing more light to trigger).
|
20-12-2007 11:25
keen101Can't soldering on a second IR module in parallel increase the range?
20-12-2007 11:27
T3_1565Our team finally got it up and running today, I during the test have come to a good conclusion
Each Team WILL NOT have a remote for anysort of transmitting!
During our test we found out that pressing the button that has been "learned" to the board and pressing another button from a different controllor (doesn't matter what button) interfers with the signal and you get no response from the board
Therefore that only thing I see this being used for is if the field transmits date to the bots!
20-12-2007 12:09
Elgin Clock
|
Our team finally got it up and running today, I during the test have come to a good conclusion
Each Team WILL NOT have a remote for anysort of transmitting! During our test we found out that pressing the button that has been "learned" to the board and pressing another button from a different controllor (doesn't matter what button) interfers with the signal and you get no response from the board Therefore that only thing I see this being used for is if the field transmits date to the bots! |
Please tell me I misunderstood you.
20-12-2007 12:32
Donut
|
Our team finally got it up and running today, I during the test have come to a good conclusion
Each Team WILL NOT have a remote for anysort of transmitting! During our test we found out that pressing the button that has been "learned" to the board and pressing another button from a different controllor (doesn't matter what button) interfers with the signal and you get no response from the board Therefore that only thing I see this being used for is if the field transmits date to the bots! |
20-12-2007 12:38
Kevin Sevcik
|
Hold on just a second!
If I follow what you are saying correctly, and relate it to an IR sensor on a TV & a VCR in the same room is that once you program board 1 (TV) with Remote 1 and then use Remote 2 next to it for something else (VCR, board 2, whatever the case) that you render the board 1 (and Remote 1) completely inoperable with each other? That (if you don't have a faulty board) does not sound good. Basically what I'm understnading is that when you program it with Remote 1, then pushing anything on Remote number 2 makes all remotes useles??? This doesn't make sense to me. Please tell me I misunderstood you. I have a theory if this is indeed what you meant. But I'll hold off on that while you answer this one. |
20-12-2007 12:50
Elgin Clock
|
Elgin,
I believe what he's saying is that if you program it with Remote 1 and you're only pressing buttons on Remote 1, then it works as advertised. If, however, you start mashing/holding buttons on Remote 2 and then try previously working buttons on Remote 1, then it doesn't work. If you then stop mashing buttons on Remote 2, buttons on Remote 1 will work again as advertised. This only makes sense as all the sensor is looking for is a specifically modulated pulse train from the remote in the IR spectrum. If another remote is sending out a pulse train on the same IR wavelength, you'll end up with the two pulse trains superimposed on one another, which is bound to stymie the controller attempting to decode it. This should have occurred to me earlier, but it's definitely one more argument against having several uncontrolled, uncoordinated transmitters moving about on the field. If you need a specific IR pulse to operate something on the field but another team is maliciously/accidentally/coincidentally transmitting at the same, then the two transmitters will jam each other at the receiver and nothing will happen. Of course this opens up the possibility of someone in the stands with a suped-up TV remote jamming any or all robot recievers on the field.... |

|
To use this receiver effectively, the emitters have to be situated in such a way that only one is visible in its field of view at any time. So if remotes are actually used on field, they'd have to be roughly 90 degrees apart, meaning only 4 human players. This also fights the transmitters onboard robots theory, as two robots could be transmitting to the same receiver and it would detect neither.
More backing to help the transmitters on field theory? |
20-12-2007 12:57
AndrewNThere's no reason why the four commands couldn't be used in combination:
cmd1, cmd2, pause, cmd1, cmd2 ...
giving 16 possible combinations, or 64 etc.
Might be game pieces telling the robot what state they are in.
"Busy", "Ready", "You Scored", "Go Away", "Red Team goal", "Blue Team goal ", "Penalty for using", "Extra Points Now!".... endless possibilities.
I wonder how many games we could come up with that are not the one for FRC 2008.
Possibilities increase if the robots can also send commands.
Remember - it's all idle speculation - we just don't have enough info. 
As for the interference - mount the receiver in a box and make it look down a tube, it'll become very sensitive to direction and less able to be interfered by another transmitter.
20-12-2007 13:35
T3_1565|
Hold on just a second!
If I follow what you are saying correctly, and relate it to an IR sensor on a TV & a VCR in the same room is that once you program board 1 (TV) with Remote 1 and then use Remote 2 next to it for something else (VCR, board 2, whatever the case) that you render the board 1 (and Remote 1) completely inoperable with each other? That (if you don't have a faulty board) does not sound good. Basically what I'm understanding is that when you program it with Remote 1, then pushing anything on Remote number 2 makes all remotes useles??? This doesn't make sense to me. Please tell me I misunderstood you. I have a theory if this is indeed what you meant. But I'll hold off on that while you answer this one. |
20-12-2007 14:16
njamietechJust a question:
What would be the purpose of the playing pieces sending out signals like "I'm worth one point"?
Wouldn't this be useless during human operated mode? wouldn't we need a display to let us know what signal the pieces are emitting during Human mode?
Just seems like FIRST would not go to that much trouble to equip their game pieces with that tech when it would only be useful for 10 seconds.
Correct me if I am wrong.
20-12-2007 14:20
www.divsys.comWow...I am enjoying all the guessed scenarios for the "real" use of this board. Talk about a serious WWW brainstorming session. Keep it up ladies and gentlemen...restlessness breeds ingenuity.
BMW
20-12-2007 14:24
JB987It is great to see so many teams off and running with creative speculation and so busy trying to familiarize themselves with the IR "hint"...those fortunate enough to have received one. Team 987 anxiously awaits their delivery. Here's our concern...should it turn out that this part is an important component of the game, isn't there an issue of fairness regarding some teams having almost a week headstart working with the part while the rest of us sit here empty handed??? Seems to be inconsistant with standard FIRST policy so does this mean this might just be another red herring?... in which case this has been much ado about nothing? If this component is important, any ideas how we and other teams still waiting can get ahold of our IR board?
20-12-2007 14:25
T3_1565|
Just a question:
What would be the purpose of the playing pieces sending out signals like "I'm worth one point"? Wouldn't this be useless during human operated mode? wouldn't we need a display to let us know what signal the pieces are emitting during Human mode? Just seems like FIRST would not go to that much trouble to equip their game pieces with that tech when it would only be useful for 10 seconds. Correct me if I am wrong. |
20-12-2007 14:27
T3_1565|
It is great to see so many teams off and running with creative speculation and so busy trying to familiarize themselves with the IR "hint"...those fortunate enough to have received one. Team 987 anxiously awaits their delivery. Here's our concern...should it turn out that this part is an important component of the game, isn't there an issue of fairness regarding some teams having almost a week headstart working with the part while the rest of us sit here empty handed??? Seems to be inconsistant with standard FIRST policy so does this mean this might just be another red herring?... in which case this has been much ado about nothing? If this component is important, any ideas how we and other teams still waiting can get ahold of our IR board?
|
20-12-2007 14:28
njamietech|
Chances of using it on the pieces are slim to none. Look at pervious years. Do you really think they will have thousands of game pieces equip with IR?? I doubt it personally. I mean they could, but look how many pieces get trashed in one year, all at $5+ to have produced (thats how much the board cost, so I'm assuming a transmittor cost that much as well). It seems unlikely. |
20-12-2007 14:33
T3_1565|
That's what I was thinking too...
Now what if the field was sending out those types of signals... Wouldn't we still need a display? Wouldn't it still be useless outside of autonomous? |
20-12-2007 15:03
Elgin Clock
|
It is great to see so many teams off and running with creative speculation and so busy trying to familiarize themselves with the IR "hint"...those fortunate enough to have received one. Team 987 anxiously awaits their delivery. Here's our concern...should it turn out that this part is an important component of the game, isn't there an issue of fairness regarding some teams having almost a week headstart working with the part while the rest of us sit here empty handed??? Seems to be inconsistant with standard FIRST policy so does this mean this might just be another red herring?... in which case this has been much ado about nothing? If this component is important, any ideas how we and other teams still waiting can get ahold of our IR board?
|

20-12-2007 15:42
Turtlecoach|
That's what I was thinking too...
Now what if the field was sending out those types of signals... Wouldn't we still need a display? Wouldn't it still be useless outside of autonomous? |
20-12-2007 16:32
T3_1565this is a neat idea!
But as I said in previous posts I can't see the game revolving around this IR board. Much like Rack N' Roll didn't revolve around the spider foot 
I see the being useful but not nessacary!
And through testing, my biggest concern with this piece is interference. If the transmitters can move, they can interfer with one another, your bin idea could work but, they would have to be stationary, and not pointing at one another lol.
20-12-2007 17:09
Problems I can see:
If the sensor is on the robot:
field has transmitter
-can't have IR reflective material for the walls (multiple interfering signals)
-fairly expensive if its on game pieces that get destroyed
player has transmitter
-players transmitting at the same time interfere with each other
-2 teams with the same signal for different things can mess with each other
If the sensor is on the field:
Robot has transmitter
-need to be fairly accurate with the transmitter
-2 robots transmitting at the same time = nothing happens (interfere)
player has transmitter
-isn't there an easier way than IR, like just 4 buttons?
If the sensor is at the player station:
field has transmitter
-why use IR for this?
robot has transmitter
-robot can transmit data through the radio, why use IR?
20-12-2007 19:55
Ryan OProblem: I get which cables do what, but we only have one cable for each output, and dig ins are pwms, aka 3 cables. How do you wire it to connect?
thanks for any help
20-12-2007 20:28
PhalanxWell I have a thought for the moment and I wonder the significance or potential impact to the actual usability of this device.
Most event venues that I have attended use tungsten/halogen lighting. With all that IR being thrown out on to the field from the lighting it will make using IR as a requirement for this year game quite the challenge to over come.
What is a halogen bulb?
Halogen is a type of incandescent lamp. It has a tungsten filament just like a regular incandescent that you may use in your home, however the bulb is filled with halogen gas. An incandescent lamp produces light by heating a tungsten filament.
How much heat or infrared radiation is emitted by halogen light bulbs?
Because incandescent and halogen bulbs create light through heat, about 90% of the energy they emit is in the form of heat also called infrared radiation.
Any other intriguing thoughts on this aspect?
20-12-2007 22:28
Mark McLeod
|
Problem: I get which cables do what, but we only have one cable for each output, and dig ins are pwms, aka 3 cables. How do you wire it to connect?
|
20-12-2007 22:39
TurtlecoachIR remotes work in buildings and arenas with Halogen lighting. One aspect is the sensitivity angle. Think of what happens when you are too far to the left or right of your TV when you go to change channels... nothing happens until you get in front of it. Other thing to remember is the signal is modulated on a 38kHz(?) carrier. Lights won't put that frequency out. So, the receiver is looking forward and not up and is modulated so the lighting shouldn't be an issue.
20-12-2007 22:51
Turtlecoach|
Problems I can see:
If the sensor is on the robot: field has transmitter -can't have IR reflective material for the walls (multiple interfering signals) -fairly expensive if its on game pieces that get destroyed player has transmitter -players transmitting at the same time interfere with each other -2 teams with the same signal for different things can mess with each other If the sensor is on the field: Robot has transmitter -need to be fairly accurate with the transmitter -2 robots transmitting at the same time = nothing happens (interfere) player has transmitter -isn't there an easier way than IR, like just 4 buttons? If the sensor is at the player station: field has transmitter -why use IR for this? robot has transmitter -robot can transmit data through the radio, why use IR? |
20-12-2007 23:14
T3_1565|
If the Field is going to control the robots via IR, then and only then will the robots not need emitters. And since it would be much easier to control all robots via RF instead of IR, I don’t think that is the case.
|

20-12-2007 23:32
If the signals are fixed, as you suggest, there will be interference until you are fairly close unless you have something like a tube around the sensor to limit where it gets input from. +/- 40 degrees is quite a range for a signal to be received from, especially with the ability of materials to bounce a signal back into the field. The big problem with IR as a whole is anyone in the stands with a 38khz remote can mess with any robots that are facing toward the stands. I do agree that if emitters are on the field they will be fixed, but that limits it to probably 4 sensors unless there are walls on the field to stop stray IR.
20-12-2007 23:59
T3_1565|
If the signals are fixed, as you suggest, there will be interference until you are fairly close unless you have something like a tube around the sensor to limit where it gets input from. +/- 40 degrees is quite a range for a signal to be received from, especially with the ability of materials to bounce a signal back into the field. The big problem with IR as a whole is anyone in the stands with a 38khz remote can mess with any robots that are facing toward the stands. I do agree that if emitters are on the field they will be fixed, but that limits it to probably 4 sensors unless there are walls on the field to stop stray IR.
|
21-12-2007 00:56
Donut
Since we're concerned about potential interference, I'd like to ask teams who used IR back in 2004... were there problems of the two IR emitters in 2004 reflecting off of objects and interfering with each other? Or if you used another IR sensor (such as the Sharp range finders), did the IR emitters on field interfere with their operation?
If there weren't problems then, I don't see any reason to think there will be this year. Our team took the line following approach that year seeing as I did autonomous and was just beginning programming back then, so we didn't see how the IR was out on the field.
21-12-2007 03:34
Turtlecoach|
I disagree with this.
The field does not need to "control" the robot at all, but "inform" the robot about something (ie. the colour of the goal, what piece this goal accepts, etc..) which is not so easily done through RF. I believe this seems more like what will happen because the IR signals are jammed very easily (try programming a remote to your board, push a programmed button, and then push a button on a different control from about 10 feet away). This means that if the emitters move around the field, things will be jammed all the time. It seems more logically (to me anyways) that the emitters will be fixed, so they cannot jam on another and each robot will have to have their IR board programmed to the signals (much like callobrating the camera last year to see that particular light in that building), so more than one robot can interact with the signal at the same time. Just MHO ![]() ![]() |
21-12-2007 04:34
tajmortonHas anyone managed to download the firmware off the PIC yet? We tried to build a programmer for it (http://www.techfreakz.org/oldstuff/picb.html), but couldn't find any software that worked with the PIC that's on the board. Anyone have any recommendations of software programmers that work with easy to build HW programmers for the PIC16LF87-I/SO.
- Taj
21-12-2007 06:22
But where do the opposing robots fit in to this interpretation of past games? Also, the place where you put the "samples" in rack n roll was not in an exact position, there was quite a range of positions that the spider legs could be in and a fairly close fit for the tubes on the rack. Its an interesting interpretation, only time will tell how accurate any of these speculations are.
21-12-2007 08:05
Doug GOk it's taken me like 5 days to catch up with this post, whew... Here's my thoughts...
1. It's not going on the Field. If it were on the field what are 1500 teams going to use to interface with it on their practice fields? It would still require another controller and such to hook up to this board so it could actually do something like release an object or control a servo. Perhaps they will give us another circuit setup in the KOP, but I think that is a stretch.
2. It will be a part that can go on the robot that will give your robot more information about the field. I like the ideas folks have mentioned about each corner having an emitter.
3. Perhaps this a clue that we'll finally have an autonomous period at the end of a game. If each corner is emitting a unique IR signal, then robot could determine which way to go home for a bonus score or something.
4. It will be as optional to use as the camera has been the last few years. While as cool as this is, there will be many teams at a lost on how to efficiently interface this in their robot or game strategy.
21-12-2007 08:22
Bill Moore|
Problems I can see:
If the sensor is on the robot: field has transmitter -can't have IR reflective material for the walls (multiple interfering signals) -fairly expensive if its on game pieces that get destroyed player has transmitter -players transmitting at the same time interfere with each other -2 teams with the same signal for different things can mess with each other If the sensor is on the field: Robot has transmitter -need to be fairly accurate with the transmitter -2 robots transmitting at the same time = nothing happens (interfere) player has transmitter -isn't there an easier way than IR, like just 4 buttons? If the sensor is at the player station: field has transmitter -why use IR for this? robot has transmitter -robot can transmit data through the radio, why use IR? |
21-12-2007 10:29
Anamn3sisFor anyone who hasn't received their board yet, here is a Hi-Res gallery if you want to inspect it: http://www.flickr.com/photos/9051550...7603516542645/
21-12-2007 11:11
Mr_IForgive me for not having read 40 pages of comments yet, but I just got the IR receiver today (drat snow days!)
Could it be that alliance robots will have the ability do communicate with each other?
21-12-2007 12:00
Daniel_LaFleur|
Forgive me for not having read 40 pages of comments yet, but I just got the IR receiver today (drat snow days!)
Could it be that alliance robots will have the ability do communicate with each other? |
21-12-2007 12:45
emusteveSo here's a new thought...
FIRST sends us a sensor with a hunk of pretty rainbow ribbon cable. Does this mean we can go back to sane wiring practices like using ribbon cable to wire our sensors, rather than being restricted to using big hunky 24awg or larger stuff? After all, they've been giving us 30awg PWM splitters all these years.
Steve
21-12-2007 13:09
GeoffPMaybe a complex version of laser tag with a capture the flag objective? a win/loose game would be unlikely though because penalty points would have to be assessed real time.
21-12-2007 15:15
T3_1565
)
21-12-2007 15:27
Mark McLeod
21-12-2007 15:41
jerry w|
Ok folks, I have it on very good authority how this game piece is going to be used. Please pay close attention to the directions, otherwise, yours will not work properly:
1: You're going to need 2 blank sheets of white paper and a pencil. A pen will not do. 2: You need to be in a location where you will not be interrupted. You will have very limited time once you start. 3: Sit down at a large table, you will need to spread out 4: Take your game piece sent to you in the mail. Place the piece front side up on the table, and drape the first piece of paper over it like a tablecloth 5: Making sure that the paper stays in place, take your pencil and holding it horizontally, rub it across the paper back and forth from one side of the board to the other until you get a full scale drawing 6: Turn the board piece upside down and do the same with the other piece of paper 7: Now this step is very important. Take your 2 sheets of paper and 2 pieces of tape, and hang the papers on your door or on your cubicle. You now have artwork to remind you of all of the fun you had anticipating the 2008 game. Enjoy the water game! ![]() PS. What did you think you were going to get from the non-techy!? |
21-12-2007 16:12
IndySam
|
The longest threads are in the Games/Trivia sub-forum.
Word association is at 9,247 posts |
21-12-2007 16:16
Daniel_LaFleur|
now this is one of the best posts so far! it focuses on what we have in hand instead of wishing that the board would do fantastic things.
i have already posted 4 clues. anyone who is serious about solving this puzzle needs to examine the board. CLUE# 5 the programmers might best like this clue. on the robot controller the digital inputs are the most used connections for feedback devices. we often come close to using all these inputs. so why would first design a board with 4 ouputs? only a single remote can be detected at any time. thus only a single output line will pulse. this provides 4 pieces of information. it takes only 2 bits to hold 4 different values. the board should have 2 signal lines if the robot controller is to use this IR detector. therefore, this will not be on the robot. we should try to determine what field-device could be activated by the 100 ms pulse from this board. there must be 4 gates, or 4 containers, or 4 of something. jerry w |
21-12-2007 16:32
coolbotz|
now this is one of the best posts so far! it focuses on what we have in hand instead of wishing that the board would do fantastic things.
i have already posted 4 clues. anyone who is serious about solving this puzzle needs to examine the board. CLUE# 5 the programmers might best like this clue. on the robot controller the digital inputs are the most used connections for feedback devices. we often come close to using all these inputs. so why would first design a board with 4 ouputs? only a single remote can be detected at any time. thus only a single output line will pulse. this provides 4 pieces of information. it takes only 2 bits to hold 4 different values. the board should have 2 signal lines if the robot controller is to use this IR detector. therefore, this will not be on the robot. we should try to determine what field-device could be activated by the 100 ms pulse from this board. there must be 4 gates, or 4 containers, or 4 of something. jerry w |
21-12-2007 16:54
SyncopationAs per new email from FIRST:
|
42.349905 -71.076072 342.242026 |
21-12-2007 17:11
Nuttyman54
342.24 as an elevation measurement....
342.24 inches = 28.52 feet
342.24 cm = 11.23 feet
the elevation of Boston is ~19 feet above sea level, so either one of those is plausible for the ground level of Copley Square
EDIT: Copley Sq is about 16 feet above sea level, so it's not the ground elevation. HOWEVER, if you look at the satelite view in Google Maps, it appears to be pointing DIRECTLY at a statue or post of some sort. This could be the elevation of the top of the statue, a plaque on the statue....anyone want to go take a look? (I would, but I'm in California at the present time)
EDIT #2: Statue appears to be of John Singleton Copley, the square's namesake. Famous for his paintings, parents were traders. Theres more on his wiki page. Hint could also just as easily involve the physical statue attributes, or his name (Singletons anyone?)
EDIT#3: Copley Square is the official finish line for the Boston Marathon (Credit to Ruth of 1735 for this one)
21-12-2007 17:18
T3_1565wow.... are you guys all physic... that was exactly the same things said in the email blast thread lmao
21-12-2007 18:15
Nuttyman54
Discussion about the second hint has moved here
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=60297
22-12-2007 05:24
Mr. Freeman|
d. IR receiver might be “listening” to the goal to determine where a scoring element (ball, block, hoop, etc…) needs to be deposited. Individual goals might have four bins, the IR transmitter at the gate would instruct the robot which of the four bins the element needs to be dropped into. How well the robot fulfills the instruction will determine how many points you score.
|
22-12-2007 10:35
jerry w|
I do believe you are missing something here.
While it is true that the reciever board we got can only read 1 signal at a time, and that there 4 different types of signals that can be read, there are 5 possible conditions coming out of the reciever. And they are: Out0=on,Out1=on,Out2=on,Out3=on, and no signal recieved. Therefore 2 bits will not cover all of the possible outputs from the board. |
22-12-2007 14:55
caraddicted101This might have been pointed out earlier in the thread, but i thought i would say it myself...2004 game - there was a LED receiver that was used in auto. mode. I want to say that this is a re-try of that? but with a more sophisticated device?
22-12-2007 16:09
lucasmaker#2247Even taking so many theories, it can not be "Breaking the head" before the kick off, it is healthy, but many people are giving shot in the dark, as well as in other years. The only concept that we have are of new technologies, and this is good, but on the game can not know virtually nothing
...
...
...
...
Will be Triangles and not Cases, or Cubes, or Boxes, or Squares....
Will be Triangles
22-12-2007 18:00
jerry wplease
it has been 24 hours.
has no one in that area got a gps unit?
google is not accurate within about 50 feet.
i would like to know what is on the ground at the suspected coordinates.
please, will someone go make the measurement?
jerry w
OOPS
22-12-2007 18:24
DonRotolo
|
Because incandescent and halogen bulbs create light through heat, about 90% of the energy they emit is in the form of heat also called infrared radiation.
|
|
Does this mean we can go back to sane wiring practices like using ribbon cable to wire our sensors, rather than being restricted to using big hunky 24awg or larger stuff? After all, they've been giving us 30awg PWM splitters all these years.
|
|
it has been 24 hours.
i would like to know what is on the ground at the suspected coordinates. please, will someone go make the measurement? |
22-12-2007 18:36
njamietechkeep in mind that a GPS device can be off by 50 feet as well, depending on the signal quality.
22-12-2007 19:03
DonRotolo
True, although since the Feds switched off selective availability it's a bit better.
Nevertheless, there are ways to get really good accuracy, for example. I have used this to locate my radio antenna tower to within a few feet.
74 01'W 41 01'N is about 32 feet NE of the tower, if anyone cares.
Don
22-12-2007 19:16
billbo911Another thought came to me today, and it wouldn't surprise me that others have thought of this as well.(If this has already been suggested/posted, please ignore mine.)
Could the fact that we were given GPS coordinates as a clue, mean that we will be receiving GPS coordinates, for positioning purposes, on the field? If so, the third coordinate would most likely be a height value. (Look at what is being used in Surveying and Construction these days. )
Just food for thought.
22-12-2007 19:18
Daniel_LaFleur|
Another thought came to me today, and it wouldn't surprise me that others have thought of this as well.(If this has already been suggested/posted, please ignore mine.)
Could the fact that we were given GPS coordinates as a clue, mean that we will be receiving GPS coordinates, for positioning purposes, on the field? If so, the third coordinate would most likely be a height value. (Look at what is being used in Surveying and Construction these days. ) Just food for thought. |
22-12-2007 19:52
billbo911|
Civilian GPS coordinants are only good to about 10 feet and GPS signals are notorious for dropping out in some structures (like a steel building) and in high EM areas.
|
22-12-2007 20:14
Daniel_LaFleur|
For civilian GPS, you are correct. In fact, when I backpack, my GPS is sufficient. If I know where I am within 3 meters, I'm really happy!
But remember, I said to consider what is used in surveying and construction. Thing in the 1 - 3cm accuracy range. Good enough for robots??? |
22-12-2007 20:22
billbo911|
Surveying and construction are done out doors and therefore will have cleaner signals.
To get to the 1-3cm accuracy from a non-military GPS you'd need 4-5 signals from different GPS satalites and time to syncronize them (hours). In addition, reflections cause havoc in such systems, nevermind the EM field around the robot. |
22-12-2007 20:24
DonRotolo
|
To get to the 1-3cm accuracy from a non-military GPS you'd need 4-5 signals from different GPS satalites and time to syncronize them (hours).
|